What I liked:
Wade - one of the main characters, I could connect with him as a person easily enough and liked him.
Storyline and Plot - I liked the overall arc, despite the slight "chosen one" feeling it gave.
Pace - Perfect.
What I didn't like:
The Writing Style - After about 50% into the book it stopped bothering me because the plot was engaging but it seriously bothered me until then. It's clumsy and lazy.
Sometimes the writer would preempt something that the book might be critiqued upon, case in point -
"There was history between these seemingly opposite sides, but neither came across as part of a classic “good versus bad” formula, but rather “unsociable misfits versus smug, preppy jerks.”
The writer here essentially told us this not a "good school clique" vs. "bad school clique" thing but something more "complicated", a dynamic that she promptly forgets to demonstrate anywhere and went on to ignore completely for the rest of the book.
Also, the writer literally used dialogue in the worst, most awkward ways as info dumps - and not for world-building at that - but character-building. Which brings me to my next issue.
The Character-building - Other than Wade (the love interest, which was laughably obvious from his intro) I couldn't connect to ANYONE in the book, including our MC.
The writer has obviously tried to create a varied and eclectic group but remained caricatures of the amazing and lovable people they could've been. So much potential lost. She gave them eccentricities and quirks, but none of these really stuck and felt fake.
Our MC, for example, is an orphan, so there are all these little quirks about her that one might imagine her having from the abuse she suffered in her foster care days. These qualities are MENTIONED but sometimes don't reflect on her actions. She's supposed to have trust issues but she practically falls in love with this big happy supposedly "rejects" family she finds, within days and trusts them. Now, it's mentioned that she herself is surprised that she put herself in mortal danger for people she barely knew, but again, it feels like the writer is preempting it rather than dealing with these quirks in her behavior patterns (which would be harder work), instead mentioning them and trying to reinforce the idea, using clumsy inner dialogue later on. As I said, lazy writing.
And because of these inconsistencies I just couldn't connect with her.
World-building - There wasn't much to begin with. It's not exactly a radical idea. Secret society, keeping magic from the world for their and its own good. The Harry Potter influence is actually quite heavy, there are scenes which literally feel like a retelling. It's not completely off-putting though. Some of it I even enjoyed.
No, what irked me was how much some important details were just ignored, like what is the IQ level of a gargoyle? Is it vicious monster or does it have a malevolent intelligence, because apparently they understand orders giving in human language.
Also this "elitist" behavior that the MC keeps harping on about, there was no payoff to this supposed characteristic of the magicals' society, something to be seen in Chapter 33, the second-last.
The whole administrative system and hierarchy inside the coven seems haywire and it's obvious that the writer did not put a lot of thought into it. As I said, lazy writing.
But luckily the pacing and the plot saved it for me. I'm definitely going to read further installments.