A well-written and intriguing work.
The book covers the establishment of the site, the decisions made by the military, the State Department, the CIA, and the US embassy, the North Vietnamese attack on it, how the CIA and the military reacted to its loss, and how the families of the dead tried to gain more information in the face of CIA, Air Force, North Vietnamese and Laotian obfuscation. Castle also describes in some detail the arrangements used to disguise the Air Force technicians at the site as civilians, in order to follow the letter of the Geneva Accords while attempting to preserve their Geneva Convention rights. He also notes the difficulty of assessing whether the site actually contributed to a more effective bombing campaign.
Also good is Castle’s discussion of how audacious the plan was, and the questionable assumptions at play. Ambassador Sullivan, tasked with preserving the facade of Laotian neutrality, rejected the idea, and the CIA was skeptical, but a desperate Pentagon prevailed, due to the shortcomings of Rolling Thunder. The Lao government approved the operation based on American assurances that the program would be secret. Constructing and hiding a radar facility in plain sight in neutral Laos right on the border with North Vietnam, and keeping it resupplied, would prove quite the challenge, and the communists inevitably found out about it. Castle also notes that, in the end, the system was unable to even accomplish its primary mission of improving the accuracy and effectiveness of American strikes in North Vietnam. In fact, soon after it became operational, many of the targets the site turned up were communist forces who were operating against the site itself.
The book can be a bit tedious at times. Much of the narrative deals with interagency meetings and communications, some dealing with finger-pointing, some dealing with matters that don’t seem very important to the story. Also, the narrative of the site’s operations during the war is pretty smooth, but as soon as it shifts to the questions of MIAs, missing equipment and such, the book once again becomes tedious, including accounts of postwar investigations, and even personal accounts from the author himself. This shift in tone is a bit jarring.
Still, a well-researched and interesting work.