I LOVED this book. It was probably a 4.5 for me, but I rounded up to 5. I'm sad to think I almost didn't read it. The overall reviews turn in a rating that's lower than where I would usually focus my time, so I read tons of the reviews -more than I normally ever would and decided to give it a go. This isn't a 3 star of reviews that are all 3 stars. It is a 3 star from lots of 5s and also 2s. I was interested in what factors made people rate it high or low. For me, just a few minor things stood in the way of a true 5.
1. I wish there would have been a better time line. I think the author focused on the emotional journey rather than the physical, chronological journey for Ian and Mattie. But I found this a bit confusing and distracting. I couldn't tell if they were in a country 2 days or 2 weeks and that bothered me. Shors seemed to choose to focus on one significant event from each country - but I'd have liked to have had a better understanding of the chronological part as well.
2. there were times I couldn't tell if Mattie was 10 or 15. No way she was 20 or an adult, as some of the negative reviews said, but, having raised 3 kids, there were times her behavior, emotions, etc., did NOT line up with a 10 year old to me. that said, I'm not sure what is "normal" for kid who has lost her mom - so, even having written this criticism, it's a really easy one for me to forgive.
As mentioned, I read a ton of the reviews. Now having finished the book, and really liking it, some of the negative ones are almost amusing to me:
1. he seemed almost determined to hold on to his grief - I am thankful I've not had to go through what he is going through, but I don't think there is a time line or scripted process for grief. Honestly, some of the things he go through (feeling guilty for good days, for looking at another woman, etc.) were very believable to me. He'd pledged his entire life to someone who was suddenly gone - I can't imagine that isn't a heck of a process to work through -not "just" grieving, but changing your entire mind-set.
2. A couple of my "favorite" negative reviews panned his "Australia-ness". One panned the use of Australian phrases and another questioned whether the author spent any research into how "real" Australians speak and act.
I found both comments ridiculous. As far as Ian's phrases and speech, one does not quickly move past their upbringing dialogue. I wonder if this same reviewer would critique someone from the south for saying "y'all" or "fixin". He grew up in the outback - not just in Australia, but in rural, country, "hick" Australia. Of COURSE he had a lot of "country" phrases and dialect. And of course some of them would stay with him.
As far as the questions of Shors' research of Australia, I can't imagine he didn't - any good author would. This remind me of someone who finds something wrong with every movie or every musical they see just because they think it makes them sound "cool". I would challenge this person back to indicate what research they've performed that makes them think Ian is unrealistic. Only if the reader is actually FROM Australia (in which case I'd gladly eat humble pie) do I give this review any credibility.
I realize I'm defending the book -but I'm doing so because I really do think it is a beautiful, well-written, moving book that deserves to be read. I'm so glad I went ahead and opened the cover and jumped in.