What do you think?
Rate this book
Nehanebné skutky a tiež vraždy, podvody, sabotáže a šialené pokusy spáchané v mene vedy
From bestselling author Sam Kean, comes this fascinating and thrilling tour of the darker side of science—from the past to the present, and even into the future.
In our society, scientists are the good guys—usually. Every so often one of them goes rogue and ends up on the wrong side of the law. The Icepick Surgeon exposes the crimes that researchers have committed throughout history and examines what pushes these otherwise rational men and women to cross the line in the name of science—like real-life versions of Breaking Bad.
Many of these incidents have been overlooked in the annals of history, despite their sensational nature. Others were splashed across the headlines of every tabloid newspaper in their day but have long since receded into the mists of time. The Icepick Surgeon provides a unique opportunity to resurrect these stories and take a peek at what drove people to break the ultimate taboos in ages past.
The stories range from the dawn of science in the 1600s to the high-tech felonies and misdemeanors of tomorrow, spanning all corners of the globe for the perfect fusion of the thrills of true crime with the most exciting discoveries science has to offer. The Icepick Surgeon combines both the highest aspirations of humankind with our most dastardly deeds to make for a sensational read.
In our society, scientists are the good guys—usually. Every so often one of them goes rogue and ends up on the wrong side of the law. The Icepick Surgeon exposes the crimes that researchers have committed throughout history and examines what pushes these otherwise rational men and women to cross the line in the name of science—like real-life versions of Breaking Bad.
Many of these incidents have been overlooked in the annals of history, despite their sensational nature. Others were splashed across the headlines of every tabloid newspaper in their day but have long since receded into the mists of time. The Icepick Surgeon provides a unique opportunity to resurrect these stories and take a peek at what drove people to break the ultimate taboos in ages past.
The stories range from the dawn of science in the 1600s to the high-tech felonies and misdemeanors of tomorrow, spanning all corners of the globe for the perfect fusion of the thrills of true crime with the most exciting discoveries science has to offer. The Icepick Surgeon combines both the highest aspirations of humankind with our most dastardly deeds to make for a sensational read.
387 pages, Paperback
First published July 13, 2021
1133 people are currently reading
22682 people want to read
About the author
Sam Kean
17 books1,914 followersSam Kean is the New York Times-bestselling author of seven books. He spent years collecting mercury from broken thermometers as a kid, and now lives in Washington, D.C. His stories have appeared in The Best American Science and Nature Writing, The New Yorker, The Atlantic, and Slate, among other places, and his work has been featured on NPR’s “Radiolab”, “Science Friday”, and “All Things Considered.” The Bastard Brigade was a “Science Friday” book of the year, while Caesar’s Last Breath was the Guardian science book of the year.
from SamKean.com
(Un)Official Bio:
Sam Kean gets called Sean at least once a month. He grew up in South Dakota, which means more to him than it probably should. He’s a fast reader but a very slow eater. He went to college in Minnesota and studied physics and English. At night, he sometimes comes down with something called “sleep paralysis,” which is the opposite of sleepwalking. One of his books appeared in an iPhone commercial once. Right now, he lives in Washington, D.C., where he earned a master’s degree in library science that he will probably never use. He feels very strongly that open-faced sandwiches are superior to regular ones.
from SamKean.com
(Un)Official Bio:
Sam Kean gets called Sean at least once a month. He grew up in South Dakota, which means more to him than it probably should. He’s a fast reader but a very slow eater. He went to college in Minnesota and studied physics and English. At night, he sometimes comes down with something called “sleep paralysis,” which is the opposite of sleepwalking. One of his books appeared in an iPhone commercial once. Right now, he lives in Washington, D.C., where he earned a master’s degree in library science that he will probably never use. He feels very strongly that open-faced sandwiches are superior to regular ones.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,257 reviews
October 6, 2021
A good non-fiction book of horrors for October! Final review, first posted on FantasyLiterature.com:
The first chapter is set in the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, when English biologist and naturalist William Dampier took to the sea. He was a brilliant navigator and at one point piloted the ship that rescued a marooned sailor, Alexander Selkirk, whose story in part inspired Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe. But his passion for exploring the biology and natural history of other lands, along with a desire to be rich, also led him to join some sailing crews that were shady privateers or even outright pirates, and Kean notes that there’s no reason to think Dampier stood aloof from looting and murdering natives and sailors on other ships.
From piracy it’s a natural though disturbing step to slavery, the topic of Chapter 2, in which we follow the exploits of British naturalist Henry Smeathman in the later 1700s. Smeathman initially abhorred the slavery trade (though not enough to stay off of slave ships traveling to the far-off countries he wanted to study). But eventually he began socializing with the slave ship captains and merchants, and finally engaged in slave-trading himself as, he told himself and others, a matter of economic necessity.
And so it goes. Some of the stories Kean relates in The Icepick Surgeon are easy to predict: Nazi tortures in the name of science, of course, and grave-robbing to produce human bodies for medical study … which occasionally led overly ambitious grave robbers to become murderers. There’s also Walter Freeman’s practice of lobotomizing mentally ill individuals on a massive scale in the 1940s, when he traveled across the U.S.A. from asylum to asylum on lobotomy road trips: the “icepick surgeon” of the book’s title. Other chapters have more surprising topics, like Chapter 6, devoted to the sabotage and stealing between two rival dinosaur fossil hunters in the late 1800s. That chapter, like the later one about some of the American spies who stole nuclear science secrets for other countries in the post-WWII years, made for fascinating reading and weren’t too gut-wrenching.
But it was difficult to read about animal torture (Thomas Edison, for one, when he was exploring the differences between direct and alternating electric currents), innocent people infected — often deliberately — with terrible diseases that were left untreated in the name of science, Nazi atrocities, and the torturous psychological experiments that helped form teenaged Theodore Kaczynski into the Unabomber. It’s worth reading because it’s true (by and large; Kean does indulge in the occasional speculation) but so many of these stories are harrowing and tragic. At the same time, as the author points out, we do need to consider where and why humans have gone down the wrong path and what can be done to help prevent these types of misdeeds from happening again. Some of the historical abuses this book chronicles may be unlikely to recur, but, as the appendix chapter discusses, technology opens up all sorts of new avenues for bad behavior and abuses of scientific knowledge.
The Icepick Surgeon is a sobering book but a fascinating one, and, more importantly, a needed record of scientific misconduct, both historically and in our modern time.
Many thanks to the publisher for the review copy!
"Most people say that it is the intellect which makes a great scientist. They are wrong: it is character." - Albert EinsteinSam Kean is my favorite pop science author, ever since I read Caesar's Last Breath: Decoding the Secrets of the Air Around Us in 2017. Kean has an engaging voice, a solid understanding of science, and a talent for telling stories, making complex subjects both intelligible and interesting to non-scientific readers (tellingly, he studied both physics and English literature). In his latest book, The Icepick Surgeon, Kean turns his attention to the many ways in which science has been twisted to sinister and even evil purposes over the centuries. Each chapter focuses on a different era in history and a different type of corrupted science. The perpetrators of these crimes range from well-meaning though woefully misguided people to those blinded by the quest for wealth or fame to deliberately malicious actors.
The first chapter is set in the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, when English biologist and naturalist William Dampier took to the sea. He was a brilliant navigator and at one point piloted the ship that rescued a marooned sailor, Alexander Selkirk, whose story in part inspired Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe. But his passion for exploring the biology and natural history of other lands, along with a desire to be rich, also led him to join some sailing crews that were shady privateers or even outright pirates, and Kean notes that there’s no reason to think Dampier stood aloof from looting and murdering natives and sailors on other ships.
From piracy it’s a natural though disturbing step to slavery, the topic of Chapter 2, in which we follow the exploits of British naturalist Henry Smeathman in the later 1700s. Smeathman initially abhorred the slavery trade (though not enough to stay off of slave ships traveling to the far-off countries he wanted to study). But eventually he began socializing with the slave ship captains and merchants, and finally engaged in slave-trading himself as, he told himself and others, a matter of economic necessity.
And so it goes. Some of the stories Kean relates in The Icepick Surgeon are easy to predict: Nazi tortures in the name of science, of course, and grave-robbing to produce human bodies for medical study … which occasionally led overly ambitious grave robbers to become murderers. There’s also Walter Freeman’s practice of lobotomizing mentally ill individuals on a massive scale in the 1940s, when he traveled across the U.S.A. from asylum to asylum on lobotomy road trips: the “icepick surgeon” of the book’s title. Other chapters have more surprising topics, like Chapter 6, devoted to the sabotage and stealing between two rival dinosaur fossil hunters in the late 1800s. That chapter, like the later one about some of the American spies who stole nuclear science secrets for other countries in the post-WWII years, made for fascinating reading and weren’t too gut-wrenching.
But it was difficult to read about animal torture (Thomas Edison, for one, when he was exploring the differences between direct and alternating electric currents), innocent people infected — often deliberately — with terrible diseases that were left untreated in the name of science, Nazi atrocities, and the torturous psychological experiments that helped form teenaged Theodore Kaczynski into the Unabomber. It’s worth reading because it’s true (by and large; Kean does indulge in the occasional speculation) but so many of these stories are harrowing and tragic. At the same time, as the author points out, we do need to consider where and why humans have gone down the wrong path and what can be done to help prevent these types of misdeeds from happening again. Some of the historical abuses this book chronicles may be unlikely to recur, but, as the appendix chapter discusses, technology opens up all sorts of new avenues for bad behavior and abuses of scientific knowledge.
The Icepick Surgeon is a sobering book but a fascinating one, and, more importantly, a needed record of scientific misconduct, both historically and in our modern time.
Many thanks to the publisher for the review copy!
August 26, 2022
3.5 stars
This was an interesting telling of several historical scientific figures who did horrific things usually under the guise of 'progressing science'. This book covers a lot of ground and I was really interested by each scientist who went terribly wrong in very different ways.
I rated it 3.5 stars instead of 4 stars only because there are SEVERAL times where the author refers you to find out more information by listening to his podcast or going to his website, which annoyed me. But other than that I did really like this book, so I rounded my rating up to 4 stars for Goodreads since 3.5 stars isn't actually an option.
This was an interesting telling of several historical scientific figures who did horrific things usually under the guise of 'progressing science'. This book covers a lot of ground and I was really interested by each scientist who went terribly wrong in very different ways.
I rated it 3.5 stars instead of 4 stars only because there are SEVERAL times where the author refers you to find out more information by listening to his podcast or going to his website, which annoyed me. But other than that I did really like this book, so I rounded my rating up to 4 stars for Goodreads since 3.5 stars isn't actually an option.
August 18, 2021
I received a review copy from the publisher. This did not affect my review, and what follows is my unvarnished and honest perspective.
Well, there goes Sam Kean doing Sam Kean things again. For those unfamiliar, Kean’s books generally go like this: take a scientific element (e.g., the periodic table, genetics, the brain), stir in a plethora of sometimes seemingly disconnected anecdotes, case studies, and episodes of historical significance that ultimately bake up into a pretty deliciously coherent cake, add a generous dollop of dad jokes and, boom, Bob’s your uncle—you’ve got a pretty great read that will make you an unstoppable conversational force at the next party you attend (well, back when parties were things we attended).
Kean’s last book, The Bastard Brigade, deviated from that formula, though he mostly returns to it, albeit painting on a broader palette, with Icepick Surgeon. Instead of a particular focal point within the scientific realm, however, he surveys the profession of science as a whole for instances of individuals prioritizing science, discovery, or fame, fortune, and notoriety over ethics and rigorous (albeit often tedious) data collection.
Needless to say, things can get a little dark. I mean, what else do you expect when you’ve got the “Johnny Appleseed of psychosurgery” running about hither, thither, and yon, lobotomizing people with cheerfully reckless abandon, lopping off pieces of brain like an enthusiastic new homeowner attacking a problematic hedge with top-of-the-line garden shears. Toss in grave robbers disinterring fresh corpses for greedy doctors; Nazis; torture; the Tuskegee Study; and the psychological battering of a timid gent by the name of Ted Kaczynski (perhaps you’ve heard of him?) and you’ve got quite the mix of scoundrels, ne’er-do-wells, and unethical boundary pushers.
Confession: coming off such an exceedingly dark and challenging 18 months (I split a pair of pants, lost my lucky quarter, got a pretty mean papercut…oh, and there’s that whole global pandemic thing, racial injustice, environmental catastrophes, and murder hornets), this was a heavier read than I was hoping for (if you want something quite literally lighter, check out Kean’s incandescently brilliant Caesar’s Last Breath). Still, Kean deftly navigates some of the book’s most morally thorny quandaries and, as always, there is more interesting and engaging information packed in here than an entire set of encyclopedias (dating myself much*?).
This is an extremely worthy addition to your “interesting books on sinister topics” bookshelf. And if you don’t have one of those, you really should.
*Sometimes you have to date yourself because no one else will
Well, there goes Sam Kean doing Sam Kean things again. For those unfamiliar, Kean’s books generally go like this: take a scientific element (e.g., the periodic table, genetics, the brain), stir in a plethora of sometimes seemingly disconnected anecdotes, case studies, and episodes of historical significance that ultimately bake up into a pretty deliciously coherent cake, add a generous dollop of dad jokes and, boom, Bob’s your uncle—you’ve got a pretty great read that will make you an unstoppable conversational force at the next party you attend (well, back when parties were things we attended).
Kean’s last book, The Bastard Brigade, deviated from that formula, though he mostly returns to it, albeit painting on a broader palette, with Icepick Surgeon. Instead of a particular focal point within the scientific realm, however, he surveys the profession of science as a whole for instances of individuals prioritizing science, discovery, or fame, fortune, and notoriety over ethics and rigorous (albeit often tedious) data collection.
Needless to say, things can get a little dark. I mean, what else do you expect when you’ve got the “Johnny Appleseed of psychosurgery” running about hither, thither, and yon, lobotomizing people with cheerfully reckless abandon, lopping off pieces of brain like an enthusiastic new homeowner attacking a problematic hedge with top-of-the-line garden shears. Toss in grave robbers disinterring fresh corpses for greedy doctors; Nazis; torture; the Tuskegee Study; and the psychological battering of a timid gent by the name of Ted Kaczynski (perhaps you’ve heard of him?) and you’ve got quite the mix of scoundrels, ne’er-do-wells, and unethical boundary pushers.
Confession: coming off such an exceedingly dark and challenging 18 months (I split a pair of pants, lost my lucky quarter, got a pretty mean papercut…oh, and there’s that whole global pandemic thing, racial injustice, environmental catastrophes, and murder hornets), this was a heavier read than I was hoping for (if you want something quite literally lighter, check out Kean’s incandescently brilliant Caesar’s Last Breath). Still, Kean deftly navigates some of the book’s most morally thorny quandaries and, as always, there is more interesting and engaging information packed in here than an entire set of encyclopedias (dating myself much*?).
This is an extremely worthy addition to your “interesting books on sinister topics” bookshelf. And if you don’t have one of those, you really should.
*Sometimes you have to date yourself because no one else will
September 27, 2021
Being a member of the medical community, this book was especially interesting to me even though I was aware of some of the medical "treatments" that have taken place over the years. The author approaches the subject as a study in medical ethics and how some physician/scientists ignored the humane aspects of procedures to prove their beliefs.
I will not list all the incidents that were included in the book but give the reader an idea of the horrors that, for the most part, led nowhere in addressing disease/psychological conditions.
Of course, at the top of any list is the infamous "Icepick Surgery" and I will concentrate on this since it is the most familiar. In this surgery (and I use this term loosely), the physician inserted an instrument based on an actual icepick through the orbital socket and into the frontal lobe of the brain. Since the brain could not be seen, the physician just moved the pick around, somewhat like scrambling eggs and destroyed various sections of the frontal lobe. This was supposed to calm, cure, improve......whatever word you want to use......the patient suffering from various types of mental illness. Need I say what the results were in almost all cases? The most famous surgery patient was Rosemary Kennedy, sister of JFK, who had to re-learn to speak or even use eating utensils after the surgery and spent the rest of her life in a sanatorium or under supervised care. Frontal lobotomies are still performed when all other types of procedures fail but the "icepick" version was abandoned in the late 1950s.
There are many other types of medically unethical/questionable procedures covered in this book which are a wealth of information about how far medicine has come through the years as it relates to the ethics of the Hippocratic oath. Recommended.
I will not list all the incidents that were included in the book but give the reader an idea of the horrors that, for the most part, led nowhere in addressing disease/psychological conditions.
Of course, at the top of any list is the infamous "Icepick Surgery" and I will concentrate on this since it is the most familiar. In this surgery (and I use this term loosely), the physician inserted an instrument based on an actual icepick through the orbital socket and into the frontal lobe of the brain. Since the brain could not be seen, the physician just moved the pick around, somewhat like scrambling eggs and destroyed various sections of the frontal lobe. This was supposed to calm, cure, improve......whatever word you want to use......the patient suffering from various types of mental illness. Need I say what the results were in almost all cases? The most famous surgery patient was Rosemary Kennedy, sister of JFK, who had to re-learn to speak or even use eating utensils after the surgery and spent the rest of her life in a sanatorium or under supervised care. Frontal lobotomies are still performed when all other types of procedures fail but the "icepick" version was abandoned in the late 1950s.
There are many other types of medically unethical/questionable procedures covered in this book which are a wealth of information about how far medicine has come through the years as it relates to the ethics of the Hippocratic oath. Recommended.
January 25, 2022
Just plain historiotrivial fun. I laughed some and I learned some.
3.5 stars - excellent breezy weekend reading, but did we need a plug for the author's podcast in 12% of the footnotes? (I kept track. They're that obnoxious.)
3.5 stars - excellent breezy weekend reading, but did we need a plug for the author's podcast in 12% of the footnotes? (I kept track. They're that obnoxious.)
September 4, 2022
There is a chapter in this book which explores a non-Indigenous person's experiences with a tribe & though the information was pertinent & relevant to the story, the terminology was not. I understand that when speaking (or writing) about specific programs, documents or ideals which pertained to the time in which segments take place, terminology will often be dated.
However, Kean often called Indigenous peoples 'Indians' & it was not necessary to do so. I actually thought he was introducing a segment regarding India when this chapter explored this part because I couldn't wrap my head around a non-Indigenous person thinking, in 2021, that using the derogatory 'Indian' was an okay thing to do. It's not.
I highlight that when Kean was utilizing direct quotes, document names, programs & legislature of the time; I am acknowledging the time & place in which these were relevant & in keeping the authenticity of those titles, Kean was right to not change them. However, when continuing on with the text/thought Kean should very much have changed the indicator to one of many which are acceptable today (i.e. Aboriginal, Indigenous, etc.).
For this reason, I was left feeling a bit bizarrely about the entire book. I cannot speak to personal experience for many of the other themes & segments explored & therefore felt that as I had caught an inappropriate piece in the book, perhaps someone else had noted something else, something I was not versed on. I lost my trust in the author.
These points aside, this book was fascinating & an easy audiobook to get through. Ben Sullivan did an absolutely stellar job at narrating & I attribute the flow of the whole story to his ability to capture the entirety of the segments.
Some other people have noted their displeasure that Kean ends segments with links to his podcast & I would have to agree with them. I would find myself engrossed in the information only to have myself jolted out of the story by the encouragement to 'find out more' in an episode of Kean's podcast. Perhaps had he left a footnote or included these at the end of the book I might not have minded.
All in all, a decent read & I did appreciate the narrative covered.
Thank you to NetGalley, Hachette Audio, & Sam Kean for the free copy of this book in exchange for an honest review!
However, Kean often called Indigenous peoples 'Indians' & it was not necessary to do so. I actually thought he was introducing a segment regarding India when this chapter explored this part because I couldn't wrap my head around a non-Indigenous person thinking, in 2021, that using the derogatory 'Indian' was an okay thing to do. It's not.
I highlight that when Kean was utilizing direct quotes, document names, programs & legislature of the time; I am acknowledging the time & place in which these were relevant & in keeping the authenticity of those titles, Kean was right to not change them. However, when continuing on with the text/thought Kean should very much have changed the indicator to one of many which are acceptable today (i.e. Aboriginal, Indigenous, etc.).
For this reason, I was left feeling a bit bizarrely about the entire book. I cannot speak to personal experience for many of the other themes & segments explored & therefore felt that as I had caught an inappropriate piece in the book, perhaps someone else had noted something else, something I was not versed on. I lost my trust in the author.
These points aside, this book was fascinating & an easy audiobook to get through. Ben Sullivan did an absolutely stellar job at narrating & I attribute the flow of the whole story to his ability to capture the entirety of the segments.
Some other people have noted their displeasure that Kean ends segments with links to his podcast & I would have to agree with them. I would find myself engrossed in the information only to have myself jolted out of the story by the encouragement to 'find out more' in an episode of Kean's podcast. Perhaps had he left a footnote or included these at the end of the book I might not have minded.
All in all, a decent read & I did appreciate the narrative covered.
Thank you to NetGalley, Hachette Audio, & Sam Kean for the free copy of this book in exchange for an honest review!
August 20, 2021
Remarkable and intriguing!
The Icepick Surgeon
By Sam Kean
This book is so fascinating! It has such incredible stories of how science has been used without any sort of morality or conscious. Many would be a war crime if preformed now! Some of these stories I had heard about before but this gives a lot more tidbits.
It starts with Cleopatra and her experiments on people and on up. Very eye opening! I was never bored that's for sure! If you like science and history or the bizarre, pick this up! I got this from my local library!
The Icepick Surgeon
By Sam Kean
This book is so fascinating! It has such incredible stories of how science has been used without any sort of morality or conscious. Many would be a war crime if preformed now! Some of these stories I had heard about before but this gives a lot more tidbits.
It starts with Cleopatra and her experiments on people and on up. Very eye opening! I was never bored that's for sure! If you like science and history or the bizarre, pick this up! I got this from my local library!
February 14, 2022
fabulous concept with poor execution
I like the way this book was framed, and I especially appreciated that both sides of these scientific figures were explored, similar to how scientific papers qualify their findings with limitations. Overall, Sam Kean did an ok job with the discussion of ethics around these stories, but my biggest issue with the book is his use of inappropriate terminology like "indian" when discussion indigenous communities and "hooker" when discussing sex workers. Not to mention the outrageously inappropriate jovial tone throughout the title chapter "Ambition: Surgery of the Soul" in which the "icepick surgeon" lobotomy is discussed.
Considering this book was written in 2021, and that ethics are central to this discussion, I would have expected Sam Kean to utilize the most appropriate terminology and to unpack these horrific moments in scientific history with a little more grace and respect.
If you take this book with a grain of salt, I think it's still worth a read. Lovers of horror and true crime will enjoy this.
CW: this book discussed some very uncomfortable and graphic parts of scientific history
I like the way this book was framed, and I especially appreciated that both sides of these scientific figures were explored, similar to how scientific papers qualify their findings with limitations. Overall, Sam Kean did an ok job with the discussion of ethics around these stories, but my biggest issue with the book is his use of inappropriate terminology like "indian" when discussion indigenous communities and "hooker" when discussing sex workers. Not to mention the outrageously inappropriate jovial tone throughout the title chapter "Ambition: Surgery of the Soul" in which the "icepick surgeon" lobotomy is discussed.
Considering this book was written in 2021, and that ethics are central to this discussion, I would have expected Sam Kean to utilize the most appropriate terminology and to unpack these horrific moments in scientific history with a little more grace and respect.
If you take this book with a grain of salt, I think it's still worth a read. Lovers of horror and true crime will enjoy this.
CW: this book discussed some very uncomfortable and graphic parts of scientific history
June 8, 2021
An easy to listen to story, narrated by the author, who has a pleasant reading voice. Filled with tales of scientists who crossed the line in their endeavors to further knowledge. It even calls out Cleopatra for being the first to do so, trying to determine the sex of unborn children. Some great stories in here. Advance electronic review copy was provided by NetGalley, author Tom Clavin, and the publisher.
August 7, 2023
Un doctor și-a ucis cămătarul și a lăsat porțiuni din cadavru împrăștiate în baie. Nikola Tesla, care susținea că putea vorbi cu marțienii, și Thomas Eddison, care a făcut experimente pe animale doar de dragul spectacolului, și-au măsurat... curentul, fiecare crezând că al lui este mai bun și încercând să îl distrugă pe celălalt. Hans Sloan, un medic și naturalist apreciat, a adunat cea mai mare colecție naturală din lume, inclusiv fătul unei femei de culoare și pielea de pe brațul tatuat al unui negru. Criminalii erau disecați după o execuție, ca o pedeapsă suplimentară. În 2004, directorul unei case de pompe funebre a vândut armatei SUA cadavre pentru a fi folosite în testele pentru încălțămintea blindată în contact cu minele.
Greu de acceptat, dar, oricât am încerca să negăm, fără mulți dintre cei pe care îi vom judeca pe parcursul lecturii știința ar fi suferit o întârziere în dezvoltare. Dacă modul în care au procedat a fost total greșit, atunci de ce nu este greșit și că au fost folosite în continuare datele obținute de ei? Greșelile lor rămân evidente și nu există îndoială că lipsa compasiunii, lăcomia și excesul de zel s-au transformat în cruzime, dar linia dintre utilitarism și deontologie nu a fost chiar ușor de văzut în unele cazuri, din punctul meu de vedere. Scrisă într-un stil simplu și succint, care nu te obosește și plictisește în nicio clipă, dar fără a neglija minuțiozitatea informațiilor, Chirurgul și cuțitul de gheață a ajuns printre cărțile mele preferate de nonficțiune. Dacă ar trebui să folosesc doar două cuvinte despre ea, acestea ar fi ,,de citit". Recenzia aici: https://rb.gy/gp7h7.
,,După cum a spus Carl Jung, în fiecare dintre noi se ascunde o persoană malefică și numai dacă recunoaștem asta putem spera să o îmblânzim."
Greu de acceptat, dar, oricât am încerca să negăm, fără mulți dintre cei pe care îi vom judeca pe parcursul lecturii știința ar fi suferit o întârziere în dezvoltare. Dacă modul în care au procedat a fost total greșit, atunci de ce nu este greșit și că au fost folosite în continuare datele obținute de ei? Greșelile lor rămân evidente și nu există îndoială că lipsa compasiunii, lăcomia și excesul de zel s-au transformat în cruzime, dar linia dintre utilitarism și deontologie nu a fost chiar ușor de văzut în unele cazuri, din punctul meu de vedere. Scrisă într-un stil simplu și succint, care nu te obosește și plictisește în nicio clipă, dar fără a neglija minuțiozitatea informațiilor, Chirurgul și cuțitul de gheață a ajuns printre cărțile mele preferate de nonficțiune. Dacă ar trebui să folosesc doar două cuvinte despre ea, acestea ar fi ,,de citit". Recenzia aici: https://rb.gy/gp7h7.
,,După cum a spus Carl Jung, în fiecare dintre noi se ascunde o persoană malefică și numai dacă recunoaștem asta putem spera să o îmblânzim."
July 27, 2021
The chapters in this book cover the wide range of unethical, illegal, and just plain evil things that have been done in the name of science (or in the name of using science for fame and money). They range from unethical experimentation (you've heard of the Nazi doctors, but have you heard of the US Public Health Service's Tuskegee and Guatemalan syphilis studies?), to grave robbing; murder (and the use of scientific skills to try to cover up) to animal electrification and execution; fraud (falsification of police drug testing on a massive scale!) to over prescription (of LOBOTOMIES). There's a lot in here to humble scientists and remind us that humans are complex in their motivations and behaviors and can do great wrongs for reasons both venal and noble.
The stories were really well told and engaging, but this wasn't a perfect book. Other than the general theme of "scientists doing bad" there wasn't a whole lot connecting the stories in the book. At times it felt like a series of loosely connected magazine stories or podcast episodes - and in fact several chapters included a very annoying "for more information on this check out his podcast episode on my website" plug. The chapter on nuclear espionage didn't really feel like it fit with the rest of the book too either. That said, the stories here were educational (I hadn't heard of many of them before) and important.
**Thanks to the author, publisher, and NetGalley for a free copy in exchange for an honest review.
The stories were really well told and engaging, but this wasn't a perfect book. Other than the general theme of "scientists doing bad" there wasn't a whole lot connecting the stories in the book. At times it felt like a series of loosely connected magazine stories or podcast episodes - and in fact several chapters included a very annoying "for more information on this check out his podcast episode on my website" plug. The chapter on nuclear espionage didn't really feel like it fit with the rest of the book too either. That said, the stories here were educational (I hadn't heard of many of them before) and important.
**Thanks to the author, publisher, and NetGalley for a free copy in exchange for an honest review.
May 12, 2023
Man, I have an awful lot of issues with this as a scientific nonfiction.
First and foremost, my biggest gripe is that the title ends with "perpetrated in the name of science" when at best most of the stories can be boiled down to "perpetrated by scientists." There are tales of ego that hedge close to being about science but nothing about the crimes even tangentially pushes science forward, there's an inclusion on how bias can negatively impact scientific data and lead to a false conclusion but that's more about the pursuit of science and less about the dastardly deeds to get there, there are conjectures that seem wildly unscientific and verge far too much into speculation (the Unabomber chapter in particular), there are stories of scientists tacitly supporting crime by funding it in their pursuit of science but the focus is more on Burke and Hare than the scientists at fault, etc etc. And finally there's a whole chapter at the end that's mostly on 'what if' space crimes which, again, aren't related to the pursuit of science at all.
-- The Unabomber chapter in particular, while certainly salacious and attention grabbing, has the least scientific rigor in presenting the case and is ultimately worth very little. While he occasionally has a caveat about how we can't jump to such and such conclusion, the manner in which it's laid out is poor and always points back to that conclusion, and there's many unsupported leaps along the way such as the idea that his family was dysfunctional because his parents were concerned that he couldn't form friendships as a child. The amount of issues I have with the conjecture and presentation in this chapter alone make me question the scientific rigor made in the rest of the book and cause me to doubt that I can accept anything the author is saying at face value: meaning that I can neither consider this book to be informative nor fun, making it a rather useless text.
My second major gripe is that the author says that we shouldn't judge people of the past by the ethical standards of today but rather judge them by the ethical standards of their day (chapter 7)... He later directly contradicts this on the chapter on animal cruelty in which he states that there were already many people protesting its use so we can judge them, I guess? But there's always a group protesting what is currently legal but they consider morally wrong (abolitionists existed before slavery is ended, yet he doesn't bring this up when talking about slavery and praises those men for being even 1% more progressive than their slavery-supporting counterparts).
The author seems to praise and aggrandize many of the men mentioned and has weird inclusions or asides that made me very uncomfortable. In the chapter on slavery he mentions how Smeathman, unlike many men of his time who only wanted "sex and grub from their women," instead "mooned" over his slave bride... his supporting evidence is a quote from Smeathman about his wife's breasts and another about how extravagant the wedding was. How does that not show him solely sexualizing his 13 yo bride and supporting his own ego with a grand display of a milestone in his own life? Just weird and unrelated to the book's supposed thesis.
The author:
Audiobook Notes: Very frustrating that each footnote is read, especially when many of them contain repetitive self-promotion to the author's podcast or prior book.
First and foremost, my biggest gripe is that the title ends with "perpetrated in the name of science" when at best most of the stories can be boiled down to "perpetrated by scientists." There are tales of ego that hedge close to being about science but nothing about the crimes even tangentially pushes science forward, there's an inclusion on how bias can negatively impact scientific data and lead to a false conclusion but that's more about the pursuit of science and less about the dastardly deeds to get there, there are conjectures that seem wildly unscientific and verge far too much into speculation (the Unabomber chapter in particular), there are stories of scientists tacitly supporting crime by funding it in their pursuit of science but the focus is more on Burke and Hare than the scientists at fault, etc etc. And finally there's a whole chapter at the end that's mostly on 'what if' space crimes which, again, aren't related to the pursuit of science at all.
-- The Unabomber chapter in particular, while certainly salacious and attention grabbing, has the least scientific rigor in presenting the case and is ultimately worth very little. While he occasionally has a caveat about how we can't jump to such and such conclusion, the manner in which it's laid out is poor and always points back to that conclusion, and there's many unsupported leaps along the way such as the idea that his family was dysfunctional because his parents were concerned that he couldn't form friendships as a child. The amount of issues I have with the conjecture and presentation in this chapter alone make me question the scientific rigor made in the rest of the book and cause me to doubt that I can accept anything the author is saying at face value: meaning that I can neither consider this book to be informative nor fun, making it a rather useless text.
My second major gripe is that the author says that we shouldn't judge people of the past by the ethical standards of today but rather judge them by the ethical standards of their day (chapter 7)... He later directly contradicts this on the chapter on animal cruelty in which he states that there were already many people protesting its use so we can judge them, I guess? But there's always a group protesting what is currently legal but they consider morally wrong (abolitionists existed before slavery is ended, yet he doesn't bring this up when talking about slavery and praises those men for being even 1% more progressive than their slavery-supporting counterparts).
The author seems to praise and aggrandize many of the men mentioned and has weird inclusions or asides that made me very uncomfortable. In the chapter on slavery he mentions how Smeathman, unlike many men of his time who only wanted "sex and grub from their women," instead "mooned" over his slave bride... his supporting evidence is a quote from Smeathman about his wife's breasts and another about how extravagant the wedding was. How does that not show him solely sexualizing his 13 yo bride and supporting his own ego with a grand display of a milestone in his own life? Just weird and unrelated to the book's supposed thesis.
The author:
Audiobook Notes: Very frustrating that each footnote is read, especially when many of them contain repetitive self-promotion to the author's podcast or prior book.
August 12, 2024
I need to write a full review.
I’ve weaseled in some way some topic in this book in pretty much every convo I’ve had this week… . Sorry people.
I’ve weaseled in some way some topic in this book in pretty much every convo I’ve had this week… . Sorry people.
April 4, 2022
[ Cross-posted to the Nicola Bramwell Blog ]
One of my favorite genres is historical nonfiction, and this book combined that interest with my second-favorite subgenre of nonfiction—science and medicine. The results were a bit of a mixed bag, however. I was anticipating a finely organized analysis of the various misdeeds and crimes of past scientists and doctors, and while I got the “various” part, the book was, in my opinion, lacking in the “organization” department.
Kean covers several of the major scientific and medical scandals from past centuries, everything from the Tuskegee Syphilis Study to Annie Dookhan’s falsification of thousands of laboratory drug tests. I hadn’t heard of some of these incidents or the people involved, so I was pleased to learn a lot of new names and the misconduct that each person committed so that I could file that information away in my mental historical record.
That said, Kean jumped around between so many different time periods and different types of science that the book as a whole felt very unfocused. On one page, I’d be reading about a guy who studied termites while making friends with slavers, and the next, I’d be reading about Thomas Edison electrocuting dogs. And sure, I like reading about a broad range of topics, but this felt like too many different topics for one single book.
I’ve read entire science history books on just the 1920s, so Kean’s persistent forward jumps through decades and centuries made me feel like I was getting a little bit of information about each time period but not nearly enough to satisfy my curiosity. Personally, I think I would’ve liked it more had this been book one of a series wherein Kean explores various scientific/medical scandals from different time periods, one time period per book. That way, each book would’ve given me a fuller picture of the historical context for each scandal.
Overall, I did enjoy the stories that Kean included in the book, but I just felt like there could’ve been so much more. So I give this book an “okay” rating.
One of my favorite genres is historical nonfiction, and this book combined that interest with my second-favorite subgenre of nonfiction—science and medicine. The results were a bit of a mixed bag, however. I was anticipating a finely organized analysis of the various misdeeds and crimes of past scientists and doctors, and while I got the “various” part, the book was, in my opinion, lacking in the “organization” department.
Kean covers several of the major scientific and medical scandals from past centuries, everything from the Tuskegee Syphilis Study to Annie Dookhan’s falsification of thousands of laboratory drug tests. I hadn’t heard of some of these incidents or the people involved, so I was pleased to learn a lot of new names and the misconduct that each person committed so that I could file that information away in my mental historical record.
That said, Kean jumped around between so many different time periods and different types of science that the book as a whole felt very unfocused. On one page, I’d be reading about a guy who studied termites while making friends with slavers, and the next, I’d be reading about Thomas Edison electrocuting dogs. And sure, I like reading about a broad range of topics, but this felt like too many different topics for one single book.
I’ve read entire science history books on just the 1920s, so Kean’s persistent forward jumps through decades and centuries made me feel like I was getting a little bit of information about each time period but not nearly enough to satisfy my curiosity. Personally, I think I would’ve liked it more had this been book one of a series wherein Kean explores various scientific/medical scandals from different time periods, one time period per book. That way, each book would’ve given me a fuller picture of the historical context for each scandal.
Overall, I did enjoy the stories that Kean included in the book, but I just felt like there could’ve been so much more. So I give this book an “okay” rating.
October 13, 2024
Interesting, informative, and even entertaining.
September 10, 2025
As someone who is endlessly interested the the macabre, this book kept me very entertained. Kean does a good job of compiling a pretty extensive list and history of the depravities that humans have committed in the name of science in a very palatable, easy to digest way. The overarching conversation here is the famous philosophical train tracks question: Is it permissible to kill one person in order to save a larger group by diverting a runway trolley?
The uncomfortable reality you're faced with when reading this book is that some of the most atrocious acts committed to humans in our history, have advanced science/medicine and in turn saved thousands of people. Now there are caveats to this, not all these experiments lead to scientific advancements of use, a handful were not even conducted properly and ultimately only really harm was caused. Nonetheless, they all bring forth a rather painful morality conversation that you will likely end up having with yourself the entire time you are reading this book.
What it really comes down to is the fact that where there are human beings, there are bad ones. In the quest to be the 1st, the best, the richest, there really isn't any line some people aren't willing to cross. Overall, this was a very insightful look at this specific part of our human history and I learnt a lot of things I didn't know and added additional insight to things I had heard about before. I listened to 'The Icepick Surgeon' as an audiobook and would highly recommend it in this form, the production was great and the narration was equally as impressive. Highly engaging, incredibly entertaining and very informative read.
The uncomfortable reality you're faced with when reading this book is that some of the most atrocious acts committed to humans in our history, have advanced science/medicine and in turn saved thousands of people. Now there are caveats to this, not all these experiments lead to scientific advancements of use, a handful were not even conducted properly and ultimately only really harm was caused. Nonetheless, they all bring forth a rather painful morality conversation that you will likely end up having with yourself the entire time you are reading this book.
What it really comes down to is the fact that where there are human beings, there are bad ones. In the quest to be the 1st, the best, the richest, there really isn't any line some people aren't willing to cross. Overall, this was a very insightful look at this specific part of our human history and I learnt a lot of things I didn't know and added additional insight to things I had heard about before. I listened to 'The Icepick Surgeon' as an audiobook and would highly recommend it in this form, the production was great and the narration was equally as impressive. Highly engaging, incredibly entertaining and very informative read.
August 1, 2021
Morally dubious science is often ipso facto bad science - that morally dubious research is often scientifically dubious as well.
The Icepick Surgeon covers murder, fraud, sabotage, piracy, and other "dastardly deeds" perpetrated in the name of science. I found this book to be my favorite type of nonfiction science book. Short vingettes of biographies from a certain moment in a person's life focusing around a certain theme. Kean focused on different deeds individuals have used science throughout history to justify their beliefs. The most important question he raised was whether it is ethical for science to utilize scientific findings that were obtained unethically. He ventured into a morally gray area where there doesn't appear to be any black and white answers.
Albert Einstein once said, "Most people say that it is the intellect which makes a great scientist. They are wrong. It is character."
Kean argued that character is the best guarantee against scientific abuse. A balance between intellect and character need to be struck in order to prevent scientific abuse.
As a bonus, Kean links this book to his podcast that goes into further details about the topics in this book that couldn't be covered within it. I thought that was a great tie in.
I did have to skip over the chapter about experiments on animals, not in the name of science but to boost Edison's ego. There are trigger warnings for several topics within this book.
I'd heartily recommend this book to anyone interested in nonfiction, science, and/or true crime.
The Icepick Surgeon covers murder, fraud, sabotage, piracy, and other "dastardly deeds" perpetrated in the name of science. I found this book to be my favorite type of nonfiction science book. Short vingettes of biographies from a certain moment in a person's life focusing around a certain theme. Kean focused on different deeds individuals have used science throughout history to justify their beliefs. The most important question he raised was whether it is ethical for science to utilize scientific findings that were obtained unethically. He ventured into a morally gray area where there doesn't appear to be any black and white answers.
Albert Einstein once said, "Most people say that it is the intellect which makes a great scientist. They are wrong. It is character."
Kean argued that character is the best guarantee against scientific abuse. A balance between intellect and character need to be struck in order to prevent scientific abuse.
As a bonus, Kean links this book to his podcast that goes into further details about the topics in this book that couldn't be covered within it. I thought that was a great tie in.
I did have to skip over the chapter about experiments on animals, not in the name of science but to boost Edison's ego. There are trigger warnings for several topics within this book.
I'd heartily recommend this book to anyone interested in nonfiction, science, and/or true crime.
June 9, 2021
“Science is Simply the Word We Use to Describe a Method of Organizing Our Curiosity” … Tim Minchin.
Sam Kean tells us about some crazy people and the things they did in the name of science.
This was a audiobook and the narrator Ben Sullivan was great! He always does a good job.
I love history and this kept my interest all the way through. The author convincingly wrote about the horrors. I was shocked about the Nazi’s experiments and how we learned so much from them.
If you love history and crime I highly recommend this.
Thanks Little, Brown & Co via Netgalley.
Sam Kean tells us about some crazy people and the things they did in the name of science.
This was a audiobook and the narrator Ben Sullivan was great! He always does a good job.
I love history and this kept my interest all the way through. The author convincingly wrote about the horrors. I was shocked about the Nazi’s experiments and how we learned so much from them.
If you love history and crime I highly recommend this.
Thanks Little, Brown & Co via Netgalley.
June 16, 2021
The Icepick Surgeon: Murder, Fraud, Sabotage, Piracy, and Other Dastardly Deeds Perpetrated in the Name of Science
by Sam Kean
⚡️ I was provided an audio-ARC by the publisher via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review (Out 7/13)
TW: This book contains graphic descriptions of physical and psychological tourture, ableist language, and outdated and racist terms, along with the other crimes listed in the book’s subtitle
🌟: 3 / 5
📚: An exploration of the most despicable discoveries in medical research, told through the doctors and scientists whose ambitions trumped the morals, ethics, and safety of the people that they were hoping to help.
💭: At its heart, the message that this book is trying to get across is that the ethics and human cost of research is something that we need to constantly need to evolve, scrutinize, and be conscious of. Kean uses true crime-style case studies to discuss the crimes that scientists have committed in the name of advancing our understanding of medicine. It’s extremely engaging storytelling and is written and narrated well, but there are many instances where readers are pulled out of the narrative for Kean to advertise his podcast (it’s on Spotify and Apple Podcasts! This chapter was episode 22!).
All of this being said, I had a lot of issues with the language chosen to represent these ideas. For a book that emphasizes learning from the downfalls of the past when it comes to creating a more humane and ethical future in medicine and medical research, the way that it’s spoken about is not as thoughtful when it comes to the word choices that Kean uses. At first I gave him the benefit of the doubt, maybe he was quoting a contemporary source and the audiobook made it sound like it wasn’t a quote. However, towards the end of the book, there were some distinctions made about word choices that one sources uses no longer being in use and all uses of them were paraphrased from a published case study on that topic, and that distinction on one word’s use made me genuinely angry about the previous word choices.
This paragraph refers to specific and potentially triggering words that the author used
As with many books about medical history, I kept having to stop reading and walk away because the content of this book is so awful. Although it was written well for the content and does a good job of broaching the topic of why we need ethics in medicine to constantly be scrutinized, it was often just a lot to take in (some chapters more than others for sure). Unfortunately, the ethical issues that this book raises aren’t all completely over with. The penultimate case study focuses on the traumatic treatment of intersex, transgender, and queer youth who endure surgeries and therapies, often without consent. It’s hard to read and heartbreaking to consider, but occasionally felt like these issues were a part of the past like the other stories featured in this book. It’s very crucial to remember that ethical issues in medicine still exist and will continue to arise as science and our understanding of medicine evolves, and I think that the conclusion and afterword touch on this well; however, the fact that these aren’t addressed until after so many hard-to-read anecdotes troubles me for a couple of reasons. I wish that these considerations were more top-of-mind while reading and introduced as readers go into this book, and I worry that many readers will stop reading this book ahead of getting to these considerations, purely because of the nature of this book.
by Sam Kean
⚡️ I was provided an audio-ARC by the publisher via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review (Out 7/13)
TW: This book contains graphic descriptions of physical and psychological tourture, ableist language, and outdated and racist terms, along with the other crimes listed in the book’s subtitle
🌟: 3 / 5
📚: An exploration of the most despicable discoveries in medical research, told through the doctors and scientists whose ambitions trumped the morals, ethics, and safety of the people that they were hoping to help.
💭: At its heart, the message that this book is trying to get across is that the ethics and human cost of research is something that we need to constantly need to evolve, scrutinize, and be conscious of. Kean uses true crime-style case studies to discuss the crimes that scientists have committed in the name of advancing our understanding of medicine. It’s extremely engaging storytelling and is written and narrated well, but there are many instances where readers are pulled out of the narrative for Kean to advertise his podcast (it’s on Spotify and Apple Podcasts! This chapter was episode 22!).
All of this being said, I had a lot of issues with the language chosen to represent these ideas. For a book that emphasizes learning from the downfalls of the past when it comes to creating a more humane and ethical future in medicine and medical research, the way that it’s spoken about is not as thoughtful when it comes to the word choices that Kean uses. At first I gave him the benefit of the doubt, maybe he was quoting a contemporary source and the audiobook made it sound like it wasn’t a quote. However, towards the end of the book, there were some distinctions made about word choices that one sources uses no longer being in use and all uses of them were paraphrased from a published case study on that topic, and that distinction on one word’s use made me genuinely angry about the previous word choices.
This paragraph refers to specific and potentially triggering words that the author used
As with many books about medical history, I kept having to stop reading and walk away because the content of this book is so awful. Although it was written well for the content and does a good job of broaching the topic of why we need ethics in medicine to constantly be scrutinized, it was often just a lot to take in (some chapters more than others for sure). Unfortunately, the ethical issues that this book raises aren’t all completely over with. The penultimate case study focuses on the traumatic treatment of intersex, transgender, and queer youth who endure surgeries and therapies, often without consent. It’s hard to read and heartbreaking to consider, but occasionally felt like these issues were a part of the past like the other stories featured in this book. It’s very crucial to remember that ethical issues in medicine still exist and will continue to arise as science and our understanding of medicine evolves, and I think that the conclusion and afterword touch on this well; however, the fact that these aren’t addressed until after so many hard-to-read anecdotes troubles me for a couple of reasons. I wish that these considerations were more top-of-mind while reading and introduced as readers go into this book, and I worry that many readers will stop reading this book ahead of getting to these considerations, purely because of the nature of this book.
February 16, 2025
I'm a sucker for anything that talks about the Bone Wars or old-timey grave robbers. A great audiobook for a commute or while doing chores.
October 8, 2021
You had me at Sam Kean. If you enjoy science history, these are the books for you. Kean finds compelling stories and connects them to well-known figures, technologies, and everyday experience. In The Icepick Surgeon, Kean shares stories of "Murder, Fraud, Sabotage, Piracy, and Other Dastardly Deeds Perpetrated in the Name of Science". In the hands of a propagandist, this could easily be a screed about the moral failings of science. Kean presents something more subtle and compelling: a reminder that scientists indeed are humans. The full range of human experience will be reflected in the sciences, though it may express itself in surprising ways. Each chapter presents a new story highlighting a distinct category of misbehavior.
For example, I had never heard of William Dampier before, but this biologist-turned-pirate had a lasting impact on the world. He was the first Englishman to set foot in Australia, first to circumnavigate the globe thrice, and introduced terms like banana and papaya to the English language. Dampier figured out the source of winds and currents. He even coined the phrase "subspecies". He was influential to Charles Darwin, as well as an inspiration for Gulliver's Travels and Robinson Crusoe. And yet, he was also a pirate who captured ships and raided settlements, and was eventually court-martialled for cruelty.
The second chapter explores various ways in which scientists went along with and benefited from the practice of slavery. Slave boats provided passage that may have been otherwise unattainable, and slaves were given thankless, often dangerous tasks without the recognition for their efforts and likely roles in discovery. Many museums are [still] filled with things stolen from slaves. Chapter 3 is about grave-robbing, and the figures (in addition to the famed Burke & Hare) who accelerated scientific access to corpses through duplicitous and often murderous means. Another chapter looks at animal cruelty in the form of electrocution during Edison and Tesla's competing circuit-design standoff. Elsewhere we get a fascinating look at the back-stabbing "Bone Wars" between dinosaur-popularizing paleontologists Marsh and Cope.
Kean also examines the breaking of doctorly oaths, and what we do with the results of miscarriages of science such as the Tuskeegee experiments, or Nazi experiments that were mostly useless as science, but sometimes contributed [still-used] information on topics such as cold tolerance. Kean describes an additional series of experiments in Guatemala that I'd never heard about before. While the Tuskeegee operators never actually infected participants with syphilis (they prevented the sufferers from knowing their diagnoses or accessing available cures), Dr. John Cutler actually did knowingly infect women in Guatemala with gonorrhea. In the chapter for which the book is named, icepick surgeon Walter Freeman blithely jabbed a metal pick into the eye cavities of thousands of people, scrambling their brains. Another fascinating chapter looks at the formational years of Ted Kaczynski, aka the Unabomber, who was effectively tortured by his psychology professor at Harvard (Henry Murray). Oddly enough, that's not the only example of Harvard-adjacent murder in the book!
There are many more stories, and each provides human interest and a cautionary tale, along with surprising takeaways. Even when recounting stories that I'd read entire, dedicated books about, Kean offered new insights and connections I wasn't aware of. He takes obvious joy in sharing his research, and does an amazing job of culling the most interesting tidbits. That doesn't stop Kean from providing supplemental material on his website, and he points regularly to his podcast, which expounds on some of the topics introduced here. At the same time, Kean manages thoughtful and considerate handling of sensitive topics. Highly recommended for anyone with an interest in science, psychology, history, or just being the nerdy life of the cocktail party.
For example, I had never heard of William Dampier before, but this biologist-turned-pirate had a lasting impact on the world. He was the first Englishman to set foot in Australia, first to circumnavigate the globe thrice, and introduced terms like banana and papaya to the English language. Dampier figured out the source of winds and currents. He even coined the phrase "subspecies". He was influential to Charles Darwin, as well as an inspiration for Gulliver's Travels and Robinson Crusoe. And yet, he was also a pirate who captured ships and raided settlements, and was eventually court-martialled for cruelty.
The second chapter explores various ways in which scientists went along with and benefited from the practice of slavery. Slave boats provided passage that may have been otherwise unattainable, and slaves were given thankless, often dangerous tasks without the recognition for their efforts and likely roles in discovery. Many museums are [still] filled with things stolen from slaves. Chapter 3 is about grave-robbing, and the figures (in addition to the famed Burke & Hare) who accelerated scientific access to corpses through duplicitous and often murderous means. Another chapter looks at animal cruelty in the form of electrocution during Edison and Tesla's competing circuit-design standoff. Elsewhere we get a fascinating look at the back-stabbing "Bone Wars" between dinosaur-popularizing paleontologists Marsh and Cope.
Kean also examines the breaking of doctorly oaths, and what we do with the results of miscarriages of science such as the Tuskeegee experiments, or Nazi experiments that were mostly useless as science, but sometimes contributed [still-used] information on topics such as cold tolerance. Kean describes an additional series of experiments in Guatemala that I'd never heard about before. While the Tuskeegee operators never actually infected participants with syphilis (they prevented the sufferers from knowing their diagnoses or accessing available cures), Dr. John Cutler actually did knowingly infect women in Guatemala with gonorrhea. In the chapter for which the book is named, icepick surgeon Walter Freeman blithely jabbed a metal pick into the eye cavities of thousands of people, scrambling their brains. Another fascinating chapter looks at the formational years of Ted Kaczynski, aka the Unabomber, who was effectively tortured by his psychology professor at Harvard (Henry Murray). Oddly enough, that's not the only example of Harvard-adjacent murder in the book!
There are many more stories, and each provides human interest and a cautionary tale, along with surprising takeaways. Even when recounting stories that I'd read entire, dedicated books about, Kean offered new insights and connections I wasn't aware of. He takes obvious joy in sharing his research, and does an amazing job of culling the most interesting tidbits. That doesn't stop Kean from providing supplemental material on his website, and he points regularly to his podcast, which expounds on some of the topics introduced here. At the same time, Kean manages thoughtful and considerate handling of sensitive topics. Highly recommended for anyone with an interest in science, psychology, history, or just being the nerdy life of the cocktail party.
October 14, 2021
I don't think I've ever made this recommendation before: If you don't have time to read the whole book, just read the appendix. It is a series of speculations on crime in the future.
• What will happen when there's a murder in outer space?
• What rights will space colonists demand—plentiful oxygen? video or audio entertainment? the right to contact people on Earth?
• What will happen when someone brings woolly mammoths out of extinction? What will happen when somebody brings Neanderthals out of extinction?
• Could a sex robot be programmed to kill someone?
• Could a scientist use someone's DNA (from their garbage) to create an infectious disease that would kill only that person?
OK, so that's fascinating, but the main focus of the book is on the history of science. Specifically, it's short biographies of scientists who committed horrific legal and/or moral crimes. These include:
• trading in slaves to make enough money to collect rare plant and animal species, many of which are still in museums today
• killing people and selling their bodies to medical students
• denying penicillin to people with gonorrhea and pretending to treat them so they don't know to seek help elsewhere
• directing that a boy whose penis was destroyed in an accident should be raised as a girl and given female hormones
• conducting vicious, long-term, extraordinarily destructive psychological examinations of 22 young men, one of whom later became the Unabomber
• failing to test tens of thousands of samples in drug prosecutions, leading to wrongful convictions and to mass releases of improperly convicted people, some of whom were violent—all to make herself look good to her supervisors and peers
I enjoy the author's writing style so much that I'm tempted to read this again just to try to pick apart how he does it.
• What will happen when there's a murder in outer space?
• What rights will space colonists demand—plentiful oxygen? video or audio entertainment? the right to contact people on Earth?
• What will happen when someone brings woolly mammoths out of extinction? What will happen when somebody brings Neanderthals out of extinction?
• Could a sex robot be programmed to kill someone?
• Could a scientist use someone's DNA (from their garbage) to create an infectious disease that would kill only that person?
OK, so that's fascinating, but the main focus of the book is on the history of science. Specifically, it's short biographies of scientists who committed horrific legal and/or moral crimes. These include:
• trading in slaves to make enough money to collect rare plant and animal species, many of which are still in museums today
• killing people and selling their bodies to medical students
• denying penicillin to people with gonorrhea and pretending to treat them so they don't know to seek help elsewhere
• directing that a boy whose penis was destroyed in an accident should be raised as a girl and given female hormones
• conducting vicious, long-term, extraordinarily destructive psychological examinations of 22 young men, one of whom later became the Unabomber
• failing to test tens of thousands of samples in drug prosecutions, leading to wrongful convictions and to mass releases of improperly convicted people, some of whom were violent—all to make herself look good to her supervisors and peers
I enjoy the author's writing style so much that I'm tempted to read this again just to try to pick apart how he does it.
October 24, 2022
2/5 - just my little opinion, but this book was kinda disappointing. Granted, the subject matter is really interesting. I like learning about the history of medicine/science and the ethics that come with it.
This book has a lot of information in it. But I hated the tone of this book. You know those true crime podcasts that have two besties discussing a crime and they’re like chatting with coffee laughing all the way through the episode? That’s how this book read. I would’ve preferred a more straightforward approach.
The language the author used throughout contributed to that a lot. I know that original wording should be preserved when referencing a historical document, but do we really need to use terms like “Indians” and “hookers” in our commentary in 2021? I know this doesn’t bother everybody, but it’s something that I noticed. Our diction is powerful, and I can’t help but view the author as lazy here at best. I wish this read less like a dude bro’s podcast and more like an academic paper or something. I know I KNOW, somebody is gonna call me a snowflake. Most people probably don’t care, and hey - if you liked this book, I’m glad you found a good read for you. But like I said, I was hoping for something more polished.
Oh, and did he really have to go into detail about the doggy? No. :(
I said this book read like a podcast and I forgot to mention that if you hate self-promotion, don’t bother with this book. The author promotes his other content in like every chapter at least once. It got really annoying.
And for these reasons, I’m out. (à la Shark Tank)
This book has a lot of information in it. But I hated the tone of this book. You know those true crime podcasts that have two besties discussing a crime and they’re like chatting with coffee laughing all the way through the episode? That’s how this book read. I would’ve preferred a more straightforward approach.
The language the author used throughout contributed to that a lot. I know that original wording should be preserved when referencing a historical document, but do we really need to use terms like “Indians” and “hookers” in our commentary in 2021? I know this doesn’t bother everybody, but it’s something that I noticed. Our diction is powerful, and I can’t help but view the author as lazy here at best. I wish this read less like a dude bro’s podcast and more like an academic paper or something. I know I KNOW, somebody is gonna call me a snowflake. Most people probably don’t care, and hey - if you liked this book, I’m glad you found a good read for you. But like I said, I was hoping for something more polished.
Oh, and did he really have to go into detail about the doggy? No. :(
I said this book read like a podcast and I forgot to mention that if you hate self-promotion, don’t bother with this book. The author promotes his other content in like every chapter at least once. It got really annoying.
And for these reasons, I’m out. (à la Shark Tank)
June 5, 2022
„Stiinta are propriile pacate de care trebuie sa raspunda.”
„Chirurgul si cutitul de gheata. Asasinat, frauda, sabotaj, piraterie si alte fapte marsave savarsite in numele stiintei” este una dintre cele mai bune carti de non-fictiune citite in ultimul timp. Este o lectura valoroasa si inteligenta despre cele mai importante realizari din lumea stiintei, dar mai ales despre erorile etice facute in numele acesteia. Autorul prezinta cititorului o colectie de 12 povestiri adevarate ce redau parcursul a doua mii de ani de istorie ce demonstreaza ca progresul fara morala duce la catastrofe.
Cateva informatii pe care le veti gasi in carte:
- primul experiment stiintific imoral a fost realizat de insasi Cleopatra, care se spune ca ar fi facut experimente grotesti pe fetusi
- Razboiul Curentilor a fost purtat intre Thomas Edison, considerat cel mai faimos electrician din lume, care promova curentul continuu, si George Westinghouse, care castiga teren cu utilizarea curentului alternativ, cu ajutorul brevetelor lui Tesla. In incercarile lui de a discredita CA, Edison si echipa sa formata si din Alfred Southwick, un dentist care a facut experimente pe animale, acesta fiind „intemeietorul” scaunului electric. Impreuna au electrocutat mai multe animale, cat si un om, toate acestea in numele stiintei. Prima executie prin electrocutare pe scaunul electric, care s-a sfarsit infiorator, mi-a amintit de cartea The green mile a lui Stephen King.
-neurologul Freeman, expert de talie mondiala (in 1936) in anatomia creierului, a facut diverse experimente pe pacientii bolnav mintal, executand cu succes lobotomii, dar avand parte si de esecuri – unul dintre acestea fiind chiar cazul uneia dintre fiicele lui Kennedy, lobotomia lasand-o cu sechele grave, tatal sau internand-o pe viata intr-o institutie psihiatrica. Freeman este si intemeietorul lobotomiilor transorbitale – folosind stilete modelate dupa un cutit de gheata gasit in bucataria acestuia (de aici venind si titlul cartii).
„Chirurgul si cutitul de gheata. Asasinat, frauda, sabotaj, piraterie si alte fapte marsave savarsite in numele stiintei” este una dintre cele mai bune carti de non-fictiune citite in ultimul timp. Este o lectura valoroasa si inteligenta despre cele mai importante realizari din lumea stiintei, dar mai ales despre erorile etice facute in numele acesteia. Autorul prezinta cititorului o colectie de 12 povestiri adevarate ce redau parcursul a doua mii de ani de istorie ce demonstreaza ca progresul fara morala duce la catastrofe.
Cateva informatii pe care le veti gasi in carte:
- primul experiment stiintific imoral a fost realizat de insasi Cleopatra, care se spune ca ar fi facut experimente grotesti pe fetusi
- Razboiul Curentilor a fost purtat intre Thomas Edison, considerat cel mai faimos electrician din lume, care promova curentul continuu, si George Westinghouse, care castiga teren cu utilizarea curentului alternativ, cu ajutorul brevetelor lui Tesla. In incercarile lui de a discredita CA, Edison si echipa sa formata si din Alfred Southwick, un dentist care a facut experimente pe animale, acesta fiind „intemeietorul” scaunului electric. Impreuna au electrocutat mai multe animale, cat si un om, toate acestea in numele stiintei. Prima executie prin electrocutare pe scaunul electric, care s-a sfarsit infiorator, mi-a amintit de cartea The green mile a lui Stephen King.
-neurologul Freeman, expert de talie mondiala (in 1936) in anatomia creierului, a facut diverse experimente pe pacientii bolnav mintal, executand cu succes lobotomii, dar avand parte si de esecuri – unul dintre acestea fiind chiar cazul uneia dintre fiicele lui Kennedy, lobotomia lasand-o cu sechele grave, tatal sau internand-o pe viata intr-o institutie psihiatrica. Freeman este si intemeietorul lobotomiilor transorbitale – folosind stilete modelate dupa un cutit de gheata gasit in bucataria acestuia (de aici venind si titlul cartii).
March 16, 2022
This was hella fascinating! Hopefully I'll come back and leave a more thorough review, but for now, all I can say is this spontaneous book purchase was so worth it! Definitely a book you read hungrily from the prologue to the appendix...(seriously...don't skip that prologue or appendix)!
June 30, 2022
I will never think of head-hunting the same way, ever again!
January 13, 2023
“But when we sacrifice morals for scientific progress, we often end up with neither.”
I have been a big fan of Sam Kean's work for many years (pretty much since The Disappearing Spoon came out) and I was so excited to pick up his newest work! This book dives into the terrible, unethical things people have done in the name of science. As a scientist myself, I really appreciate how Kean's works always connect the scientific discoveries with the people and stories behind them. I come away from his books always feeling like not only did I learn about the science explored, but the context to the discoveries. This book in particular made me acutely aware of the moral and ethical code that scientist must abide by in order to not harm others in the pursuit of knowledge. Kean's prose is approachable and fun A fantastic read I recommend for anyone that likes science or true crime!
I have been a big fan of Sam Kean's work for many years (pretty much since The Disappearing Spoon came out) and I was so excited to pick up his newest work! This book dives into the terrible, unethical things people have done in the name of science. As a scientist myself, I really appreciate how Kean's works always connect the scientific discoveries with the people and stories behind them. I come away from his books always feeling like not only did I learn about the science explored, but the context to the discoveries. This book in particular made me acutely aware of the moral and ethical code that scientist must abide by in order to not harm others in the pursuit of knowledge. Kean's prose is approachable and fun A fantastic read I recommend for anyone that likes science or true crime!
August 15, 2021
Giving this one a just okay rating. It wasn’t terrible but I was coming in thinking it’d be amazing and deeply interesting. It ended up being marginal. Some of the “duplicitous scientific connections were pretty remote and stretched thin” and while the stories as noted by the titles sounded gripping they generally ended up being ho-hum.
November 4, 2021
The Icepick Surgeon by Sam Kean just happened to catch my eye at my library and I decided to take a chance on it. I'm glad I did because this was absolutely fascinating. It's very well researched and it pulls you right into the stories it has to tell, but it is absolutely terrifying in its own right and it doesn't look away from that aspect.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,257 reviews