Oof, I struggled to understand who the intended audience is for this book. The author, a professional Diversity-Training and Hiring Consultant for various companies and corporations, takes the "Sassy Diva"-approach to narrating (and maybe her consulting practice too). I do not care about her shoe game; I care about how she's creating positive change in the American corporate sphere. Honestly, it doesn't seem like its working for her.
But I am also not her intended audience. If I had to take a guess, her ideal reader is a young person of color entering the workforce, preparing them for the BS they're about to enter in the real world. I do not think a single white corporate executive will ever pick up her memoir.
She also barely discusses her disability, which is her prerogative, and her right to privacy, except that its mentioned in the title.
What she actually unintentionally presents in her book is how difficult she is to work with-- when she's meaning to point out the hypocrisy of these companies who fire her. Unfortunately for everyone, corporate America IS wildly hypocritical, and her approach to confronting racism in the workplace is shock and destroy, which is actually the opposite of tolerance training.
So what's my experience with this? Next to none, personally. But 2nd hand-- my dad (a white-ish Jewish man) developed and implemented Tolerance workshops for school districts throughout the 90s (his programs have been adopted in multiple counties throughout the country, including Washington DC. He partnered with Civil Rights Activists and BIPOC Tolerance educators to create these programs). So I've sat in on these workshops, and I am an Ally for this cause. What I've learned is that no one likes to be shamed publicly, and corporations have no soul and don't give 2-fs for the actual cause, they just want that Ambassador to be polite and representative of their "tolerance efforts."
Yes its BS and its hypocritical, but that it the game. And the author decides to burn bridges, at least, she doesn't convey the ability to work well with others in this book.
I don't like to leave bad reviews, but I don't think she's effectively recruiting more folks to her line of work with this book. In fact, she unintentionally reinforces the negative stereotypes of DEI work, and in the Trump/Elon era I wonder how she'll adapt.