When a disturbing series of murders reveals a conspiracy to overthrow the throne, who does England call...normally Sherlock Holmes, but at the moment he is incommunicado, so the government must turn to that most infamous criminal-mastermind, Moriarty, in his stead. Kurland doesn't do enough to distinguish this brilliant man from Holmes. Surely he is more social, and composed, but he basically uses the same methods, has his own loyal associates, and is followed by his own ineffectual cop. His role as the "Napoleon of Crime" is played down. The fact that he doesn't think of himself as "evil" isn't the problem, it's that the author acknowledges his questionable acts, but hardly makes this character use his unique resources. Moriarty's brilliance is instead forced on us through irrelevant tangents, rather than flowing naturally from his actions. However, nitpicking aside, the mystery is a interesting one, and there are actually two in this story. Tangents, dialogue, and the overall organization can be stiff, but at the crucial moments they are quite the opposite; like when Holmes shows up, and when the political underpinnings are explained. The cases unfold plainly, apparently Moriarty has less interest in theatrics than Holmes, so he reveals his thoughts as they come. Interesting concept, could have been better executed, but still worth reading.