Carl Phillipsʼ Silverchest drives away from the established conventions of contemporary American poetry, which makes his collection singularly remarkable to detail the erotic experiences of an individual not ultimately describing it, nor ornamentalizing it to give the readers an avant-garde notion—in spite Phillips is an unique American poet, whose skills are best in the fullness of the sentence in spite the brevity of his story.
How mundane we may be in our desires, dissatisfaction, and destruction, Phillips knew that to describe all of these as is and go typically structured will leave him washed away from the canon: obvious and unnecessary. What makes him otherwise then? See in “Flight of Doves” how he speaks for himself yet he alleviates his narration to a striking metaphor:
“I have been the king for whom the loveliest beasts
were slaughtered and turned trophy.”
That first sentence alone signify the animal nature of man, where he points how “brutality becomes merely a rhythm”. The irony comes in many facet, a contradiction among the verses as how come brutality, so incoherent and wild in the process, becomes a rhythm? This is what makes his metaphor thrown striking: “loveliest beasts,” he said, and after that powerful poem of sex, we will witness the erotic comes silently like a love held sincerely:
“I brush the snow from his hair, as I take him, in my arms.”
In light of his imagery, rarely does Philips give a full hint of what is happening. Aside from metaphors and irony, the poet gives a cinematic narrative that makes his poems endearing. Rare are these kinds of poet who makes an image run after another image, word after word going verbal, virtuous—cinematic.
“Sometimes it feels like a carousel horse, but
with all the paint gone strange-like, all the wood gone
driftwood, all the horses Iʼve coralled inside me set free,”
Akin to music videos not for commercial purposes, but rather for true cinematic experience, the poems of Phillips may be short, secretive in literary device, ambigous in metaphors, and mostly in one angle—the fullness of Eros is achieved. The triumph is the emotions of a wordsmith that traversed through the poems. He is not sentimental, not overtly passionate either, and does not flaunts, but rather purely linguistic only, detailing how he maps the mind first and not the heart—he shows how in music like love, we can be attached then detached again. And there is beauty of going under and not being shown.
POST-SCRIPT: “Bow, And Arrow” is the poem I considered the most powerful. The clarity of the words, the allegorical essence like a music video indeed. The short poem is not purely lyric, not Imagist, yet no exaggeration in narration, but in reading it eclipses me in two comprehended scenario, and from the complexity comes a vividness. Where am I? I felt violated but also healing—how? Why? Is “Bow” he was referring a verb or a noun? Is this a gentle aftermath of love, or a strong juxtaposition of war to the present? Philips achieved such poem that it invalidates you in a good way.