Living a life holy unto the Lord is lifelong lesson, but I think the author forgets the central message of the gospel that is that while we were still sinners, Christ came and lived a sinless life for us, was sacrificed and raised from the dead, that God would then be able to impute Christ's righteousness on us. Sanctification is not proved by how many times in a day we end up shaming ourselves but by the pure and simple fact that when we are aware of our guilt, we know that we can and do go to the cross. My friend explains sanctification as not being about sinning less, but about loving your neighbor more.
" Forgiveness is mandatory; reconciliation is optional." Contrast this quote from the book with Ephesians 2:13-16, "But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. For he himself is our peace, who has made us both one and has broken down in his flesh the dividing wall of hostility by abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace, and might RECONCILE US BOTH to God in one body through the cross, thereby killing the hostility."
When God forgives, reconciliation follows. It may even be said that one doesn't necessarily follow the other because they are in a sense, one and the same. Forgiveness doesn't just mean a clean slate, going from debt to nothing. When God forgives us and when Jesus performed the ultimate act of atonement whereby we are forgiven, our debt was not only paid in full, but paid to overflowing, abundantly! This is because God, in the act of forgiveness, imputes Christ's righteousness on us. So, it follows, that when we forgive, it is not just an act of forgetting how someone sinned against us, but to see that person (if a fellow Christian) as a saint in Christ (just as Paul addressed the Ephesians as saints) and if it is not a fellow Christian then we ought to remember that this person bears the image of God by being made in His likeness.
I would also add that I was disappointed in the way that the author used her personal stories. I have nothing against sharing and teaching from our own personal struggles and lessons, but that should not come at the expense of others in our lives in a setting such as this. Names may not have been shared, but some of the people involved in certain situations would have little difficulty in identifying themselves as the offenders.
I would disagree with many other points in this book but will only touch on one other. I would disagree with the portrayal of Joshua, the Old Testament saint. Looking back at Joshua's life as recorded in the Bible will reveal a much different character than the one suggested in the book. Joshua is not a man of doubt and who falters, but Joshua is always portrayed in the Bible as a man of God and who fearlessly trusted God. The situation that is presented as Joshua being in doubt, I think, would more accurately described as Joshua showing wisdom and discernment and spiritual maturity.