One can reread Phenomenology of Spirit [PoS] or one can read this book. It really doesn’t matter in as much as the reader will get the same out of this book as they would have from rereading PoS. This author writes his book as if he is channeling Hegel and this book reads in the same vein and for the most parts this book read as if it is a concept entwined within a concept about a thought of some thoughts, just as Hegel would write. That’s a compliment to this author. He writes this book as if Hegel was writing it while occasionally connecting thoughts that needed to be connected between sections, something that Hegel didn’t do, but would have ably served a first time reader of PoS if he had.
Hegel says cryptically what this author will say directly such as that love of wisdom pales in comparison to absolute knowledge that gets revealed through a historical synthesis which leads to the mixing of the ‘logic of desire’ with the experiences of the phenomenological that relies on our sense certainty before it becomes absolute knowledge or spirit that becomes aware of itself as an externalize notion of an objective reality. It’s our desires about our desires that differentiate us from all others, and without another we can’t really be and within Hegel’s God there must be humans in order to make him Him, while conversely Feuerbach will say it is man that creates God for man and what separates us from all other animals is that we have religion.
Hegel gets at something that is well worth understanding and this author does a great job of showing what that is. Socrates tells us how to Be a citizen within a polis, Descartes takes the world away from us in order to give us perfect rational certainty with his cogito, Hume takes causality out of the world but Kant returns it by inverting all of philosophy that came before him by starting anti-realism through intuiting space and time as foundational to the faculty of understanding for the observing subject through his Copernican Revolution of the Mind, and Heidegger will make an existential reality by showing that Being is time and time is finite, but before Heidegger gets there he must go through Hegel who takes Being and contrast it with a nothing through its negation and negates an Either/Or through a dialectic since all determinations are negations of an infinite which creates a sublation (e.g. either the stoic or the skeptic dialectically leading to an unhappy consciousness otherwise known as a Christian) , this book fills in those gaps by summarizing Hegel using Hegelise while relating what was said to previously raised points something that Hegel clearly did not do himself.
In the end, Hegel is well worth understanding because he gives one a gateway to understanding the self and soothes us from Heidegger’s Being-unto-death and his throwness which Heidegger gives without anything but an elusive hermeneutic circle which at best only flirts with authenticity through Heidegger’s mystical unveiling of a present while Hegel when carefully read makes us realize that it is not ’l’enfer c’est les autres’ (hell is others), Sartre’s most famous quote, but, rather, it is ‘hell is not having other people’ since without the objective there is no subjective, or without the other there is no self, or without the group there is no us and without the other there can be no authenticity. Understanding Hegel is necessary for putting various modern philosophers together and for soothing us from Being-unto-death and this book shows why.