1.5 Stars
Disclaimer: I won this book in a Goodreads First Reads giveaway.
BEFORE YOU BEGIN READING THIS REVIEW, PLEASE KNOW THAT IT IS LOADED WITH SPOILERS.
You should honestly read this review anyway, because I wouldn't recommend this book to anyone anyways.
I'm finally that person writing a negative review in contrast to all the many positive, glowing reviews. When I first read the description of this book and entered the giveaway, I was SO excited. I even told a bunch of my friends about it, and created a waiting list of people who wanted it after I was done. Go ahead. Read the description and tell me that doesn't sound awesome. I know you want to read it.
I got this book and began it as soon as I had a little bit of time on my hands. I was pulled in immediately. But, even at the beginning, there were hints that this experience was about to be turned sour. This book is about a pregnant woman who hires a nanny to help her with her existing children and the child she is about to have. Her husband is in the Navy, and is always gone, which supposedly adds and element of creepiness. We witness this story through the minds of the female detective taking care of the case, the pregnant mother, and the nanny. From the beginning, we get to read the thoughts and actions of the suspicious nanny. The nanny is constantly having suspicious thoughts, where she gets sentimental and talks about how she is going to ruin the lives of the family she is working for. This tirade of thoughts is so constant, its annoying. It felt as if the author believed that I was mentally impaired, and needed to shove this information down my throat until I was choking on it. SERIOUSLY, I GET IT, THE NANNY IS HAVING SUSPICIOUS THOUGHTS. Why didn't you just freaking include a description of a red arrow floating above her head?
For the rest of this review, I'm just going to put character's names and then record all the problems and inconsistencies in their behavior.
Nanny (Zoe/Heather): As I said before, the nanny won't stop thinking these red herring thoughts that will annoy the crap out of you. This continues until "the twist" is revealed. The author tries to tell you through the nanny's thoughts that this woman REALLY wants a baby to please her crazy significant other, and this is reflected in the nanny's constant thoughts about securing a baby. But, as we reach the end, we learn that she doesn't actually want a baby, and that she isn't trying at all. Wait, so then why was she having thoughts about wanting a baby so bad? Why is she using a pregnancy test if she hasn't had sex with anyone? Why did she break it in half if she doesn't actually give a shit? The author focuses less on the bigger picture of how these pieces fit together, and again, questions your intelligence by failing to match up behaviors and thoughts from the beginning of the book with the real characters revealed at the end. It's absolutely lazy, and it completely took me out of the story.
Later on, we have two more huge inconsistencies. The nanny, (who is later revealed to be an undercover agent), breaks into the husband's study to search for files. The pregnant mother is a social worker, and has the files for a woman who was killed by a murderer trying to cut out her baby. As the reader, we've had it rammed into our minds that the nanny is this murderer. Anyways, the nanny breaks into the husband's office, and proceeds to take pictures of the murdered woman's file. This makes sense with what we know at the time. At the end of the book, when the nanny is rumored to be an undercover agent, we learn that the husband was actually part of some money laundering operation (totally random plot point that comes out of nowhere that the author seemed to throw in because she had no idea what she doing). So wait, why was the nanny taking pictures of the murdered woman's file? That's completely irrelevant to her supposed purpose in the house. Yet again, the author forgot to match up the past self with the real self. That's just lazy writing.
Last inconsistency. The police are trying to solve the pregnant women murders, and they are led to the nanny. They interview the nanny multiple times, and each time she turns bright red, acts incredibly nervous, and seems uncomfortable. This makes sense at the time with what the reader knows, which is that the nanny is totally the murderer. It doesn't make sense when we later learn that the nanny is an undercover agent. She's been UNDERCOVER for weeks, and suddenly she's incapable of lying in this situation? Lazy, stupid writing. Either she's a frighteningly incompetent secret agent, or the author just didn't feel like making this story plausible. What's weird is that the female detective acts really, really, weird about the interviews. She talks about how the nanny seemed to be totally in control of the interview. They were literally 3-4 descriptions in a row of this nanny acting nervous and turning bright raspberry multiple times, in a row. Why the hell does this female detective find this so coy? This isn't even a lack of connection between past self and real self, it just doesn't make any sense at all.
Pregnant Woman (Ends up being the murderer and is faking her pregnancy): Come on readers. I read so many reviews for this book, and they all talked about the "amazing twist" at the end. I have no idea what constitutes a twist for you, but this definitely isn't it. There are no hints at this coming, and it doesn't match this woman's behavior throughout the book at all. And the twist has no complexity or building up either. All of a sudden, the killer is revealed. This is just dumb.
The worst thing that bothered me (not an inconsistency, just something really ridiculous), was that the pregnant woman discovers that her nanny BROKE INTO HER HUSBAND'S OFFICE AND TOOK PICTURES OF PRIVATE GOVERNMENT FILES. She proceeds to NOT FIRE THE NANNY, and instead agonizes about hurting her nanny's feelings. I want to emphasize how ridiculous this is, but unlike the author, I do not believe you lack intelligence.
The Detectives: Another problem with the author: Artificial extension of the plot. The author belabored and artificially filled the story by making these detectives act like bumbling fools. At one point, the female detective failed to follow up on a lead, and the male detective literally asked her why she didn't. The author prolonged things by making her characters act like idiots, AND THEN LITERALLY HAD THE OTHER DETECTIVE POINT OUT THAT THEY WERE ACTING DUMB. There's the other point that I already brought up in which they interview the nanny. At this point, the nanny is looking pretty suspicious. They interview her, and during this interview she blushes, acts nervous, and basically has "I'm guilty" printed on her forehead. The female detective even points out that the nanny is a horrendous liar. They leave the interview and seem incredibly suspicious, but they fail to tail her, investigate her, and report this horribly suspicious incident to anyone. Come on guys.
The worst part of the detective's story is their daughter. The author wanted to extend her already lengthy, horrible novel by adding a side plot that is stupid, frustrating, and completely irrelevant to the main plot. The female detective and the male detective are married, and have two daughters. The female detective comes home to her daughter telling her she's moving out and getting married at 17. I don't know how realistically the author handled this situation, because I've never been involved in anything like this, but it seemed contrived. The daughter gives her mother a nasty attitude about the whole situation and acts like a horribly spoiled brat, while the mother and father fail to take any constructive action at all. As annoying as this sideplot was, it was also totally unnecessary. I didn't care about the detective's daughter before, during, or after the conflict... she wasn't relevant to the story. Why would the author add this?
In a technical aspect, this book wasn't horrible. As frequently as I bashed the author, her writing style was not horrible, it just wasn't anything special. The writing itself exists simply to hurry the plot along without embellishment. As much as this book was supposed to be a thriller, it didn't convey a lot of tension. The gaping plot holes always prevented me from being immersed in the story, and the constant red herrings and obvious actions of the nanny didn't help either. As much as everything fell apart, the author did one thing correctly. The last sentence is phenomenal and incredibly creepy, although when I think about it, it didn't really make sense... unless all the cops were really as stupid as they seemed to be. Save yourself the trouble and don't read this book.