2.5-3 really
I was gifted this book by my friend Misbah, likely because of the melancholy woman in a black gothic looking dress overlooking a piano in an niche esoteric “Ethel Caine” kind of way (pretty valid reason to assume I’d like this book). I feel like this might be a shorter review than normal (so only 3000 words instead of 3001 lmao), just because I feel it is quite straightforward in nature and I didn’t feel altogether that there was a whole lot of reading between the lines I had to do.
Part 1
Catherine is a new mother and music composer returning to Belfast following the death of her father, with whom she had a strained relationship due to religious differences (Catherine was an atheist and her parents were strict Catholics) that resulted in her estrangement for 5 years. Upon her return she soon realizes why she left, the claustrophobic intimacies of the Catholic religion, her shrewd and incessantly critical mother and a city fraught with political tension in combination with the grief she experiences for the loss of her father should make for an emotional tale of the human condition, relationships and the fragility of life. Unfortunately, MacLaverty does not develop the relationship between Catherine and her father to its fullest extent and I think the emotional impact on the reader diminished as a result. This section of the book is written alternating between the past and the present in the form of flashbacks or memories; all of which are generic happy childhood memories- which is fine, but if you are attempting to illustrate a relationship that is complex and strained by her headstrong decisions I would have liked a flashback to their last conversation when she told him that she no longer believed in God or conversations with her father where she questions religion and is reprimanded for it. Instead we were told by Catherines internal monologue that her father told her not to come home, which felt a lot like a cop out to avoid difficult subject matter as not only would this have developed their relationship further, but it could have made for some interesting dialogue surrounding belief and religion as a whole. The book does address Catherine’s qualms about religion briefly in a flashback to her meeting one of her favorite composers in Kiev, in which he views religion as a way of being human, a mode of community- but it felt quite hollow and I think navigating religion through a familial lens should have been one of the central narratives in this book as it was the main conflict between her and her parents.
Having said that, there were some things that I enjoyed in this section of the book. The alternation between past and present I found to be an incredibly effective way of demonstrating loss. Grief fractures time. Through the lens of grief, the arrow of time becomes splintered, it can transport you to pasts where the person you lost is the focal point of every memory, to possible futures without them. So, from a literary perspective it makes sense to me that this section of the book follows a non linear chronology. I also enjoyed the use of “bird” motifs throughout the novel. When Catherine is in a state of depression or despair, sparrows are often used to depict a state of spiraling despite traditionally being a symbol of God’s love for all creations regardless of how small or insignificant in the context of Christianity. The subversion of this religious symbol coalesced with Catherines insistence of her own insignificance is such an ironic and effective way of portraying depression, a spiraling mental state and imposter syndrome.
Music was also a core theme throughout this aspect of the novel and its clear that the author has a great appreciation and understanding for it that translated well onto the page, I particularly liked the idea that instruments could be made out of virtually anything that has a sound, at one point Catherine’s music teacher used “breath” as a medium for composing a piece. Catherine also navigates the world through sound- always noticing the symphony of the mundane in her daily life. The sounds her mother and her friends make in the kitchen, the “auditory atlas” of the radio, her pitch of her father’s laughter, the tempo of the shovel digging his grave- all of these greatly contribute to her character and allowed me to reflect on the symphony of my own life and what sounds create it which I thought was pretty cool.
Part 2
It was this section of the book that was difficult to read. MacLaverty’s style and prose remained beautiful but it was this portion of the novel where music began to take a backseat and the focus was on Catherine’s pregnancy. I suppose this was done intentionally, as generally when women have children, at least initially, their own personal passions, interests and their careers take a backseat with new motherhood in its place. I just have this strange sense of alienation from the concept of pregnancy because the idea of growing a person inside terrifies me, then from the second it’s born I am mother first, person second. This is not to devalue her experience, I am sure that motherhood/ parenthood is a beautiful experience for many people with uteruses- but the fact that it is expected of me societally made for an altogether different reading experience for me and I could not bring myself to fully appreciate it. That’s not really the author’s fault, I just personally didn’t enjoy reading about it. I did however find merit in the parallels he drew between pregnancy and the process of music composition- how both are an act of creation, a part of you. Whilst I really do not enjoy pregnancy plot lines I can appreciate that.
The biggest flaw in this section of the novel, however was Catherines relationship with the father of her child, Dave. From the beginning of part 2, Dave is introduced to us as a physically absent partner and a drunk. No build up, no formal introduction, no banter between Catherine and Dave, he’s not even given a last name. And whilst I can sympathize with Catherine’s anguish when he ends up being physically abusive the complex nature of abuse is not properly communicated because Dave’s character is poorly written, 2 dimensional and without any redeeming qualities besides the fact he is good looking. I have a limited experience with abusive relationships, but I know enough to understand that abuse and abusers are multifaceted and it is difficult for victims to leave due to fear, due to their own attachments to the person in question and their own intrinsic belief of their lack of self worth. None of which I feel was fully addressed in an emotive enough way, it was like I was reading a caricature of an abuser, which is incredibly disappointing.
Having moved out of her old house and separated from her abusive partner, Catherine begins embarking on a new composition, a symphony that is autobiographical and incorporates the use of Lambeg drums to portray the nature of her abuse. Lambeg drums are played by Northern Irish Unionists and their use in the symphony to portray abuse parallel the grotesque violence Ireland endured under the hands of the English which is a metaphor I greatly appreciated. I do wish there was more regarding the political tensions in Ireland at the time during this section, I feel as though Catherine’s relationships took precedence which is fine- but again, the chance for commentary on difficult subject matter was there and not capitalized upon.
General thoughts-
I felt this was an incredibly frustrating read. MacLaverty has a clear grasp of how to write prose in a memorable and poetic way and his understanding of the importance of the structure of language and how it can reflect the protagonist’s psyche is commendable; which is why it was disappointing that the characters in this novel did not feel well developed. I can see why he was nominated form the 1997 Booker Prize, his criticisms of religion may have been controversial for the time, but read as quite obvious to me (though that might just be because I’m a teensy on the radical side of most things lol). An additional point I have is about the structure of the book being divided into 2 parts which was meant to reflect the two movements of her symphony- surely SURELY it would have made more sense to divide it into 4 since traditionally, symphonies are divided into 4 movements, or maybe he was trying to subvert tradition- I’m not fully sure. I had my reservations about a man writing about a woman’s experience with pregnancy, the inherent “maleness” of religion and domestic abuse but her mental state was quite well handled. However, because the supporting characters felt flat every experience felt hollow.
Shame, because it initially showed quite a lot of promise.