Presenting philosophy as an art concerned with one's way of life, Sellars draws on Socratic and Stoic philosophical resources and argues for the ancient claim that philosophy is primarily expressed in one's behaviour. The book considers the relationship between philosophy and biography, and the bearing that this relationship has on debates concerning the nature and function of philosophy. discourse, Sellars presents it instead as an art (techne) that combines both logos (rational discourse) and askesis (training), and suggests that this will make it possible to understand better the relationship between philosophy and biography. an art and the Stoic development of this idea into an art of living, as well as considering some of the ancient objections to the Stoic conception. The second part goes on to examine the relationship between philosophical discourse and exercises in Stoic philosophy. Taking the literary form of such exercises as central, the author analyses two texts devoted to philosophical exercises by Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius.
This was very much introductory, despite the constant use of Greek (there is a glossary in the back, so don’t let that deter you) and despite the fact that he sometimes over complicated things. Some chapters were extremely repetitive. How many different ways can you restate the point that philosophical practice is like shoemaking or medical practice? Read this book and find out. The comparison was a good one, it just wasn’t hard to grasp and yet he kept restating it over and over again. The comparison was that philosophy, like shoemaking & medicine, requires knowledge of principles first, but that knowledge is only the foundation of the most important aspect of philosophy, which is the practice or exercise of a philosophical life - the art of living - the pursuit of wisdom. The overarching point of the book, that philosophy was / should be conceived as a way of life rather than the sophisticated and highly technical form of argumentation it has devolved into, is an important one, and I wholeheartedly agree. However, I think Pierre Hadot’s work is a better place to go and get that idea. Even as a translation, Hadot is much more enjoyable to read, and I find that there is much more wisdom and insight in his books.
Sellars presents a great introduction to Stoic philosophy by presenting it as an art of living. While doing so, Sellars also tries to revitalize this conception in modern days. Sellars presents a distinct and concise introduction for those interested in stoic philosophy but do not want to be hammered by numerous self-help mumbo jumbo. It is quite academic which can make it hard to read at times, but this is mainly because of Sellars's insistence of using the ancient Greek words for many concepts. Even though this gives the text a certain academic aura, it limits the ease of reading it. Still, I would recommend the book for those interested in Stoic philosophy. The chapters on the Handbook by Epictetus and the Meditations by Marcus Aurelius can come in handy for those who want to delve into those books.
Sellars iyi ve üretken bir Stoa felsefesi uzmanı, bu çalışması gibi her çalışması faydalı. Academia.edu'da makalelerini de paylaşıyor, oradan da takip etmenizi öneririm.
This was a great introduction to Stoicism, and a really valuable thesis on how philosophy can be so much more than theory, it can help us live better lives. I came to this book after reading another introduction to Stoicism, and was hoping this book would delve a bit deeper into the details of the exercises and aphorisms. I wanted even more on the nitty gritty of how to practice Stoicism.
Sellers makes a convincing case to reestablish the importance of studying philosophy as a way of living alongside studying philosophy as a way of thinking.