A good portion of this book had me talking angrily aloud. The problem is that I'm not sure if the angry-making stuff makes me like it better or hate it. I don't feel like it was the kind of AAARGH KILL IT WITH FIRE stuff that makes me 1-star a book. Everything made sense, and if anyone ever says that this author is insincere about anything in her writing, I think I'd hit them with a pillow. It was more like I was freaking incensed with the characters themselves.
Summary time: Antonia Verde, after surviving being trapped in a collapsing opera house with a killer, during the worst earthquake ever to hit California, returns to Isla Maropa only to be hounded by kidnappers and more killers. Her ex-boyfriend, Reuben, is trying to hold onto the island against drug runners who want it for its geographical convenience.
The reason he's her ex is the thing that plagued me throughout the book. And I don't think I can cover it without spoilers, so I tagged this review.
As was mentioned in the last book, Antonia's sister Mia was in jail for the attempted murder of her husband. Mia did her time, and then immediately took her daughter and disappeared. Although Antonia is in contact with Mia, she doesn't really know where they are. Mia attacked her husband because she was afraid he had gone back to running drugs and she was afraid of him. She fled with her daughter for the same reason. These are all facts.
Reuben is Mia's husband Hector's brother. And at the time of the incident, he sided with Hector. Mia had no wounds to back up her side of the story, and Reuben didn't help. I'd have dumped him too, honestly.
Antonia is alone. Both Hector and Reuben openly blame her for "her part" in what went down, and both of them also demand to know where Mia and the kid are. Silvio and Paula, Reuben's employees, treat Antonia like crap, and it turns out that the incident is partially Silvio's fault for telling Hector that Mia was planning to leave him. Paula is utterly horrible to Antonia, without any justification, and she never answers for it. Not even an apology. The Reuben/Silvio/Paula entity of antagonism even go so far as to self-righteously claim she's only condemning Hector because of his past. She is convinced that he was running drugs again, and they will not believe anything she says.
They are all in the same camp, and they all behave so consistently badly that I was honestly afraid the book itself would decide Antonia was wrong. If it had, I think I would have thrown it in the bin.
The best/worst part is that Hector did stay clean. HOWEVER. This is not exoneration. He tries to excuse himself by explaining that the Big Bad drug runner blackmailed him into helping to acquire Isla Maropa by holding photographic evidence over his head. He was afraid of going to jail and not seeing his daughter.
So he went back to illegal activity, endangered the lives of his brother and sister-in-law, and sent his wife to jail. He actually said he understood why she attacked him, and knew it was his fault.
THEN WHY THE HELL DID HE PRESS CHARGES AND ALLOW HER TO BE JAILED?
The hypocrisy is revolting. In his wormy way, he says that he didn't want to put his daughter through knowing her dad was in jail. Then what about her mom being in jail??
I've got more experience with the whole jail part of this book than I ever want to discuss, so I know exactly how much more repellent this guy is for knowing that Mia was in the right. Ugh.
I guess what it all comes down to is that I think there should have been more candid discussion of consequences and the power of choice. Antonia feels awful when they think that Hector really did go back to drug running, and she decides that it's because she was praying for him to be condemned, rather than saved.
Praying for someone who has done something wrong to be held accountable is not a bad thing. If a man were to falsely charge and imprison my sister, I would want him held accountable. And I wouldn't lose any sleep or joy when he was. And the charge in this case is definitely false. He agreed that she had a reason to be afraid, so that means he knew it was self-defence.
All that said, no one can accuse this book of failing to engage me. eheh.