BRUTAL
Sakura Hime Kaden is very much a greek tragedy: everyone has a sad story, and if you think the cast makes it out alive by the end, you're in for a shock.
This time around I read all 12 tankobon volumes in a row, and I truly appreciated the intricacy of the relationships (and their fallouts) Tanemura created.
It was a glorious mess and I love owning the boxset.
Former review (Back then I rated the finale way lower, but now that I read all the instalments after another, I feel differently.)
I've been reading Tanemura's works ever since primary school, and I'm still reading most of her releases. Sakura-Hime Kaden is one of her worst-rated series to date, the final volume having a 2.something rating on japanese Amazon. In my opinion, that is a very unfair rating to this volume as well as the ones that preceded it (ranging in ratings between 1.something and 3.something, all very low).
This is a review of the series as a whole, but I'll try to include as few spoilers as possible, detailing in what the series failed to deliver.
Sakura-Hime was the series that Tanemura always expressed in her notes that she wanted to write badly but never managed to pitch to her publisher because the demographic of her usual magazine (for those who don't know: manga in Japan is published Chapter by Chapter in a million different magazines, each having a certain age or target group). Most of Tanemura's manga have been published in the "Ribbon" magazine. Ribbon is a mainstream magazine from one of the biggest publishers in Japan, Shueisha, and the magazine is unfortunately aimed at young girls aged 6 to about 13 or 14 tops.
Ever since she wrote and published Kamikaze Kaito Jeanne, Tanemura has often written (in the commentaries at the side of the manga or at the beginning of the chapter) about how she wanted to write a really brutal story with lots of death and gore that was ultimately a tragedy.
Tanemura commented that publication in Ribbon would be hard if not impossible, because the story she wanted to write just wasn't suitable for children.
She was unfortunately right, and I really would have wished for her and the manga that Sakura could have been published in a different magazine, aimed at more mature readers.
Sakura fails because the "funny" characters, a lot of plot elements and the cutesy style are aimed at children, while the story told is more of a neverending greek tragedy.
The chibi style often employed here, the stupid main character, the baffling magical girl elements, the immature romance of the main couple, the silly quotes, the rival subplot and the cheesy depiction of death at the end all have no place in this story.
Sakura is at it's core, a brutal legend about fate and acceptance of your own meaning and position in life, as well as love for all other human beings.
The message I believe Tanemura wanted to convey burns and sinks into the mud purely because this is a Ribbon publication and it aughtn't have been.
The reason why I think this should have had higher ratings is because this manga had the potential to rise high above Tanemura's other works, and a lot of the good stuff was there. Even a doppelganger-plot and the moral dilemma that comes from it!
Sakura could have been truly epic, and I'm sad that Tanemura didn't have the means or motivation to skip to a different publisher with a more suitable magazine (Enterbrain's Harta would have been great).