I started out sorry I'd bought this book. I was looking for something that would be a break from the heavy stuff I'm otherwise reading and that would also be a cut above the usual escape fare (why is that so hard??).
The first couple of paragraphs were really tough. So recursive. There's a view of a vista, a delineation of a line, an arc that encircles, etc. I thought, well, the writer seems smart. Maybe this is deliberate and is meant to represent the character in some way, and indeed it does seem this is a reasonable interpretation of Jodi.
However, this type of writing, except in a couple of places, does not really keep up. I can't decide if this is a good decision. If it had kept up, it probably would have become annoying. But because it doesn't keep up, you can't tell if the moments when the style appears are just sloppiness/overwriting.
Anyhow, it was pretty hard to like either character, as other reviewers have commented. That's okay. Raskolnikov is not a likable character either. But Raskolnikov is an INTERESTING character. He's vibrant. He's smart. He's torn. He's deluded. He's intellectual and driven by demons.
Jodi doesn't THINK much. She too is deluded, but her delusions aren't interesting--she's driven by delusions of normalcy. One thing that's very odd--she thinks she's protected herself from her mother's life by refusing to marry and have children. Of course, this leaves her vulnerable. It's odd that she doesn't see, in our times, and as nearly every other woman would, that financial independence would generally be the path to leaving your options open. This doesn't cross her mind even after Todd does what Todd does.
As the book went on, Jodi's character opened up a bit, but there were still a lot of loose threads, and she wound up not really having to face up to anything. Nor did Todd. The end.
So. Meh.
Oh, and one other thing. V. minor, but persistently annoying and an editor should have caught it. This is a book set in Chicago, with American characters. Americans don't go "to university." They are not "at university." This is a Britishism and I guess maybe a Canadianism. If you are setting something in an American world, you say, When she was IN COLLEGE, even if it was technically a university. Or, When she was attending the university (less commonly). You could also say, We went to school together, or, We were in school together.