What do you think?
Rate this book


404 pages, Kindle Edition
First published November 10, 2012
The main character, Rachel contributes her need for bondage and BDSM activities to orgasm to her childhood sexual abuse. This is a "major" conflict in her new relationship with a cookie cutter "nice-guy" Ian (who happens to be a rich lawyer)(...Right). Ian's character is just as bland and unimaginative as Rachel is self-depreciating and immature. The only time I actually liked Ian's character is when Rachel actually TELLS HIM what she wants sexually and he gives it to her rough. But of course, we can let women believe that it is okay for them to tell their men how they want sex so, Ian becomes mad that she asked him to do that and she runs away like a teenager.
Through-out the entire novel Rachel struggles with her "sexual demons" and need for rough sex, but never once thinks that maybe, just maybe, she would have enjoyed BDSM even without her sexual abuse. The entire time I wanted her to < b>DUMP the vanilla Ian and find a comforting Dom type from one of Cherise Sinclair's novels. Only one character acknowledges that BDSM is a sexual lifestyle that is between consenting adults and is a normal sexual activity, and only at the very end of the novel. I find this book an uneducated look at sexuality, and plays into the common misconception that for a person to want rough sex (or play in BDSM) they must have been damaged emotionally or sexually to engage in those activities. It is just one of plethora of novels that is following the trend of self-deprecating "broken" women that miraculously find the strength to "fix" themselves for a relationship.