I disagreed with most of the author's premises, though she is obviously a competent and thoughtful psychologist who really cares about kids and families. After each sentence of this book, I wanted to say "Yes, but..." The book overall lacked a nuanced insight into the ways individual and structural forces combine to produce inequalities and social problems. For example, she says that most of the time, if an African American child has low self-esteem, it's not because of societal racism, it's because s/he received negative racial messages from her/his own family (e.g. using "black" as an insult). This seemed like a strange claim to me. One of the ways racism gets passed on is that it's internalized by the targets. So it's not an either/or question. Maybe the actual equation is more like "Children whose families give them negative racial messages may be more vulnerable to societal racism, and the combination affects their self-esteem." The weird thing is that there were some places in the book where she did show a more nuanced understanding. But it wasn't applied overall.
I felt really ambivalent about her approach to young children - basically that it's better (1) to emphasize similarities over differences, and (2) to avoid teaching them about racism for as long as possible. My concern with #1 is that it can send the message that difference is bad. She calls the early childhood stages "racial innocence" - to my mind, romanticizing young children. Yes, learning about race (the social construct that divides and dehumanizes us) is unfortunate, but what about different cultures, different skin colors? Couldn't we see these as positive things to teach children about? (As a side note, her view of "racial innocence" conflicts with a study detailed in a really interesting sociology book called "The First R: How Children Learn Race and Racism", which shows that very young children have more understanding of racial terms than adults think.)
My concern with #2 is that it risks invalidating the child's experience. Wright says that often, even if an incident actually IS racist, you shouldn't let on to your young kids that it's about race - you should just act like it's someone being rude or unkind or silly. This seemed deceptive to me. I am really interested in figuring out age-appropriate ways to talk about issues of inequality, and it probably won't sound like talking to an adult about these issues. But I don't like the idea of pretending or putting up a false front to children.
A few things I liked about the book:
- The chapters on adolescence were much more congruent with my way of thinking (although I wanted more exploration about HOW to stand up to racism in constructive ways; I like her point that "Living a good life is the best revenge," but wish she could have looked at ways to challenge someone's racism while still staying in relationship to them - when they are your friend/ neighbor/ classmate/ etc.).
- I was interested in her research about how children conceptualize race (e.g. very young children using color or food words - peach, vanilla, chocolate - to describe others) and how their understanding of race develops over time.
- The section on corporal punishment was of great interest to me, as I work with a lot of parents who use corporal punishment - it gave me a lot of food for thought.