Alright, this book was definitely a wild ride for me. I definitely did not like Buckland as an author due to his blue book. I absolutely destroyed that book by crossing out things, writing in the margins, basically demanding that Buckland own up to the fact that his history, facts, and some of his opinions were really bad. But this book – the one right here - (minus that very shitty appendix section – which I will get to eventually) is actually fairly decent. I would recommend this book, with some caveats about certain spells and some acknowledgments about some of the language and more hmm, parts of this book. I own a third edition, so I don't know how other editions are.
I honestly have to say that beginners and the more experienced spell casters should pick it up and have a decent read through the spellwork in this book. I was not offended by the fact that we have Christian and Pagan chants for every spell – but if those chants aren't right for you, find something else that does. This particular book is extremely flexible when it came to changing or altering things to make it easier for people to model and change it up. It's actually one of the things that Buckland champions in the book himself.
In that regard, this book is plainly useful for people who really need to learn different styles of spellwork that come from a textile and very physical place. A lot of spellwork in occult or new age books are not folk magic or practical. They are more metaphysical or ephemeral.
In being more practical or physically based, this book introduces concepts in spellwork like movement over time meaning both over certain specific time frames and days, movement and interaction with sympathetic magic towards the petitioner, bullying the candle (meaning saying something, blowing the candle out, relighting it, saying the same thing, blowing it out again, only to repeat this process), and symbolism which is directly linked to a particular result. It's not about finding your spiritual core per se but dealing with the now and the things you need.
Honestly, Carl Weschke's foreword minus the Divine Power specific parts and the spelling of magick (with the k) should be required reading for most beginner spell casters as a idea of why low magic (or in this case, practical magic) is important. This foreword was amazing, and a very nice change of pace from the usual bullshit in the New Age section. I really appreciated it.
Another thing I'd love to note is that Buckland in detail, with diagrams, explains how to actually dress a candle. Now I know this is something that may appear in other books (which I have not read) but this is the first book that I've reviewed that went into this much detail and with this much intention of clearly educating the spell caster how to dress a candle. Now I know how to dress a candle because I asked someone else, and it involves using a cookie sheet and some wax paper. But it wasn't something I could easily find many years ago. Buckland's using a completely different technique here, but honestly, for this alone – from page 8 to 10 in the preparation section? This is a great resource for any new spell caster.
Now for the drawbacks...
Buckland's introduction – as well as his appendixes - are well... bad. It is clear to me that Buckland begrudgingly made this book of practical magic. That he was loathe to step away from his Religiosity to publish this book. Especially saying that this book was “not witchcraft” (because Witchcraft is a religion [see my other book to give me more money – says Buckland]) and emphasizing that he is not responsible for publishing any of the “evil” magic that may appear in this book because it's not a Witchcraft [see his other book – says Buckland].
Similarly, in the appendices he outright writes in detail about spellwork and magic that he finds to be unacceptable. If you think it's morally or ethically problematic, why are you writing it in such detail? We can give him a small hand pat for attempting to clear up that the hexes he's publishing are not Vodun, but rather coming out of British magic via “Black Magic.” But that is something we should be discussing how that framing of language as well as the reason why it gets associated with “Voodoo” instead of English magic is important. The fact that Black is being used in a derogatory sense, also needs to be discussed. Buckland absolutely doesn't bother with that, just moves on expressing more of the hexes themselves and washing his hands of the implication of publishing them.
In the last section of the appendix, Buckland attempts to answer the question of how to do these spells in this book without candles – for all the practical reasons, you know nosy neighbors, living conditions, concerns about pets – and absolutely fails to do so. His solution is “Creative Visualization” because “everyone can visualize” which is absolutely not true and not useful. People wanted to perform the spells he has listed, not use an entirely different technique. And that technique, to these 2022 eyes, looks very “The Secret” and that “manifesting” dialogue that's not in the element of the practical or physical style that's throughout this book.
In Buckland's failure, allow me to give you options. You could use Crayons instead of candles because they are still waxy and come in a host of colors. I would just touch the top of the crayon as if I were lighting it and move on with the movement of the spell. You could also use unlit candles as well – but some leases explicitly say you cannot have any candles. Likewise you could use rocks or even buttons, and move them around. If you have pets, you could instead of having the spell be laid horizontal use the vertical and use a magnetic board or a pin board and pin the movements. You could even write the physical words of what the meaning of the colors and draw their movements in. Honestly there's so many alternatives to the physical nature of this spell that candles are just one vehicle which will get you to many other core parts of spellwork.
Instead of verbalizing the chants, you could mouth the chants. Think them. Write them down. You could read them, scanning each word carefully with your eyes. You could for the psalms simply pull open the bible to the psalm's beginning and hold it above the items below. Similarly you could print the chants and do the same. You could write them down with your finger on the table, spelling out each word if you didn't want to have a physical copy – or write them in the air above the items below. You could also write the chants or psalms out in honey on a plate, run hot water over them, collecting the honey water in a bowl. Wait for it to cool, and drink the words in the middle of the spell. You have plenty of options available – words don't just need to be spoken to be powerful or to be useful in spellwork.
I think this comes from a place of rigidity where Buckland cannot look past what his own idea or framework of what spells are. This really limits his ability to provide an educated or even more useful answer to those that look up to him as a resource or an expert. I was extremely disappointed by this appendix in particular.
In terms of other things to be on the look out for (as usual in my reviews) there is not really a lot of inclusive language for the petitioners. It never use gender non-specific language – always the petitioner is a him generally. All of the marriage references are heterosexual couples (and also just couples, there's no concept of poly relationships). In addition since we're on the subject, there's one particular marriage spell that is extremely manipulative to me – and does not actually “fix” what it exposes to do. Meaning that it “grows love” from the partners to each other, but it doesn't actually resolve the issues that exist in the marriage itself. It basically uses love as a binding mechanism – which I'd argue is more of a hex forcing people to stay together to ultimately be hurt even more when they separate because there's no understanding, there is no attempt and repairing or mending any of the real issues in the marriage. This is one of those, let the therapists who do marriage counseling handle this one alright.
Circling back to the Religiosity – the fact that we do not have a full explanation about where these tables (Astral Candles, Symbolism of Colors, Days of the Week and their colors) come from is really important to address when considering folk magic or low magic. Much of the symbolism comes from Transcendental and other forms of High Ritual Magick. It's not low level symbolism or low level sympathetic magic (which Buckland makes up a fact about on page 1 in the Introduction). It's pretty obvious because colors are getting assigned specific ritualistic meanings. That in of itself makes it a little iffy how secular friendly these are just as written when you remove the chants and substitute something different – so you will need to adapt them to remove the religiosity.
But generally there wasn't very much else that stood out to me in a negative way.
Finally, in terms of the spell casting, a lot of times I preferred the Christian versions over the Pagan versions. Both in terms of the actions being performed, but also because the Christian version explained in more concrete or more direct ways what it was doing. Whereas the Pagan versions of the spells were more or less copies of the Christian version with some changes here or there. Buckland probably could have added more spells to this book if he had simply just had a space for the two differing chants. Though there are times that the spells are completely different (such as the Christian spells using that bullying technique I referenced above and the Pagan one using no such method).
I have very little to complain about this book in it's entirety. If you'd like, please go ahead and see if you can snag a copy at your local used bookstore or request it from your library. There are many interesting types of spells in here. I think there's a lot of lessons to learn here from some of these spells as just examples. You certainly could grow, in terms of your knowledge and experience, simply by reading this book's mechanics for casting.