After reading again Poor Charlie's Almanack, I noticed many similarities in the methods of thinking between these two books. It’s easy to understand why these methods align, as Charlie himself was an excellent student of the wisdom passed down by earlier generations. I rated this book 3.5 stars—a challenging rating to give. The reason is that Charlie illustrated his viewpoints clearly through practical, real-life examples, whereas this book did not. The author failed to offer any fresh perspectives on the teachings of historical thinkers who were considered among the wisest of their time. That lack of originality and insight was disappointing.