The Laughter of Strangers, written by Michael J. Seidlinger, is a tough book that zips, stings, and burns. The prose floats like a butterfly but the content stings like a bee. The staccato style of the language and writing contributes to an overall unease, an anxiety, a desperation, that permeates the entire text and can make the reader unnerved and uncomfortable, at the very least.
More, please.
But the narrative strategy is only the beginning. It seems that Mr. Seidlinger’s novel takes pleasure in dancing and flirting with psychosis and madness. It is the laughter that you hear. It is the laughter that you fear. It is the laughter that Sugar hears, the laughter that Sugar fears. The laughter of which, we wonder if it really even exists, or if it exists more as the paranoia of Sugar’s crushed and devastated mind. The laughter is often portrayed as troubling for Sugar, and the reader will find Sugar obsessing over and over again about this laughter, a representation and reflection of his slipping grip on reality.
What causes Sugar’s psychosis? What causes his mental instability? There are many causes. He is a burnt-out boxer; that would explain a few things, brain damage being one of them. I think it’s safe to make that assessment, due to the intensity of the language used, phrases such as “beating the s*** out of myself,” or the multiple references to violence and self-violence: clearly, something went wrong for this boxer.
Like things can go wrong with us at any moment.
You cannot expect a fairy tale with this narrator.
But other things contribute as well. Pressure need not always be a physical pressure, the pressure to always be the best can be just as crushing. The pressure of having to stay at the top, the pressure of the media, the pressure of trying to perfect your skill and talent, and to not incur the laughter of the strangers, your audience, people we should loathe but paradoxically look toward for some kind of nonexistent comfort … I think that could drive anyone insane, if they are put in that situation long enough. It represents the dangers of forced self-consciousness, how that resembles torture in some ways, no different from taking an uppercut, or a blow to the stomach.
I would describe this novel as an experimental psychological thriller with a touch of the speculative. The novel’s pacing is fast like a thriller, with deep immersion into the consciousness of the main character, cut apart only by the narrative structure and strategy, of interspersing “subtitles,” so to speak, among the actual flow of the text.
Aside from the structural originality of this experimental thriller, the novel’s structure with the subtitles also reinforces the theme of psychosis. There comes a point where it almost seems as if the subtitles are an extension of Sugar himself, of this I speaker, but the effect is that of a split discussion … it is that of schizophrenia.
This would make sense, when thinking about the novel’s obsession with the unstable self, the philosophical idea that there is no stable “I.” It is never perfectly clear whether characters like X are really real, or simply represent the fragmented self of Sugar. The novel pushes the philosophical unstable self, the unstable I, idea further, however, by focusing not on the instability of the “I” pronoun, but on the names themselves, such as Dynamite, and all those personalities imply. The way that Mr. Seidlinger weaves in the various personalities (or anti-personalities … or separate personalities?) is chilling and complicated, at the very least.
It takes a certain grit to write like this. It takes a certain rawness, but an understanding of what it means to truly experience pain but simultaneous determination. I myself am jealous of writers that can tackle something so … blood and guts. This book is not fine wine, this is undistilled vodka: capable of knocking you out in a single blow. While that in no way implies that this Metamodern work isn’t fine art, one would do well to praise this novel not on its attention to beauty as we traditionally define it, but beauty defined as a deep understanding of what pushes us over the brink, what drives us over the edge.
The answer that Seidlinger provides is not an easy one, or one that is easy to swallow. It seems that society itself, coupled with an uncontrollable internal drive, is what pushes us into self-destruction. The book asks seriously the following philosophical question: why is it in our nature to want to destroy ourselves, to run ourselves raw and ragged, before we’ve even fully grasped the significance of what it is we have done or want to do? Why do we, in Seidlinger’s words, want to beat the s*** out of ourselves? This almost seems to imply an unredeemable quality that drives the human species forward while simultaneously self-destructing. For people that struggle because they push themselves to their breaking point, whether pushing their mind beyond human endurance, or pushing their bodies beyond human endurance, like Sugar, this book will highly resonate. The book is in a sense a rough and raw manifesto on what it means to push yourself so hard that you literally collapse and fall apart, because you cannot take anymore. Amazingly, though, there is a kind of freedom and liberation that comes from this type of pressure, of pushing one’s boundaries (much the way Seidlinger’s narrative strategy pushes certain expectations of the novel or the thriller), that even though one of the conclusions of this book is highly troubling and disturbing (the idea that humans with an intense drive eventually push themselves toward self-destruction), it seems to be the only way that a fully realized human can truly live. This is one of the deepest existential concepts to come out of the novel. It isn’t just about how unstable the I self is, it is about the existential push, the drive, the determination, that exists in all of us, and whether or not we allow that to liberate us, or splinter us into factions of disconnected personality: essentially, an incomplete self.
In a beautiful turn of events, however, the novel ends with the biggest sucker punch of them all, what really liberates us: connection to the outside world, what we all crave, and the power of being appreciated for who you are, but gently, genuinely. I will not give the ending away, but it is a satisfying ending to a story that has run itself dog tired trying to please the audience
Read this book if you want a good clean punch to the head. If you want to understand the darkness and emptiness that is the human heart, but also the passion that burns within all of us, read this book. It is highly original, and in fact, I don’t know where to fit this book on the continuum of modern or even classic literature, because it is uniquely its own. That is of course always a good thing for an experimental novel. The closest relative to this novel is probably Burgess and his novel A Clockwork Orange, where both novels think seriously about violence. But while Burgess’s book is a scathing satire on the pointlessness of violence and our attraction to it, Seidlinger’s novel focuses more on the untamed and metaphysical violence that exists within, the violence that exists within your own soul, your own mind, and how that can either hurt or hinder you, depending on what you choose.
Indeed: read this book if you want to uncover the psychosis that can push you over the brink, to destabilize yourself and your personalities. To split you apart. Read it if you want to uncover the mysteries of raw passion, of brute force, and how it can seduce even the toughest fighter. The results are not always good, but you might finish with the ability to fight the best fight of your life … which can only come through sacrifice and perseverance.
Such a story can only come from a writer who has lived such a life, of determination and passion, and all the trouble that brings. I imagine Mr. Seidlinger would agree with this claim …