The story’s premise could be considered a compelling one. It presumes to be about a man frozen in the Artic Ocean and found by scientists in 2006. Who then reanimate him by bringing him back to life in a future he is not familiar with nor aware of, since the time of his ‘drowning’ occurred in 1906.
The story is told through multiple voices, which include the head scientist, the reporter, the frozen man, we come to know as Jeremiah; and, specifically Kate, a biologist who has been relegated to the night shift to watch over him in the ‘lab.’ Through their voices we can see that Jeremiah is regaining his memory, and Kate and he are becoming close. Which may be a conflict, considering this is a time when science wants ownership over their own masterpiece ‘Frankenstein’ experiment.
I wasn’t sure I was going to read this one because when I first looked it up on Goodreads, I only saw low star reviews and DNF’s for the book. I couldn’t help but ask myself as to whether I should invest in reading it.
But I have been a typical fan of magical realism. Which this story seems to show signs of, with hints of science fiction. After all, has there really been a human brought back to life after being frozen in the Artic Ocean for 100-years?
Curious, I chose to read it. I found myself focused mostly on Kate and Jeremiah’s chapters in the beginning. I wanted to know them. And, how they would navigate this circumstance they found themselves in. I wondered what their outcome would be.
Kate was certainly concerned when she shared…
“It felt like the rules were designed to prevent my efforts, or anyone’s, to humanize the poor lab creature we’d awakened.”
Kate found herself doing everything she could to introduce Jeremiah to this new world of 2006. She showed compassion for him as a human spirit trying to reconnect him to living and the industrialized advanced world progress. As readers, we can’t help but feel Jeremiah’s reaction to 2006 when he shares…
“Humanity, you’ve been busy.”
But more than anything, I was interested in Kate and Jeremiah. Which led me to wonder too if this book might also be a romance, as well. Was Kate’s character hinting at it?
“…when love comes into your life, it calls upon your whole being to be worthy. If you rise to that challenge, it will plant roots and you will blossom.”
So why the low reviews? I recognize that we all see books differently. Feel them at different times when we read them. I know I am one of the worst moody readers I know. But could the combination of the 3 genres of magical realism, science fiction and romance have set this story on the wrong path? I really wanted to know. So, I kept reading.
With the media and religious fundamentalists questioning the ethics of the research, it was interesting to ‘watch’ the firestorm ignite. What happens when scientists mess with the dead? What are the ethics of this research?
And, for those of us who may have held out for a well-crafted romance, what will Kate’s actions do to her life and eventually Jeremiah’s?
This is a thoughtful, introspective read which may create discomfort for some readers, and moments of pause for others. A read that should make for interesting group discussion.
3.5 stars