I was first introduced to Gareth Morgen's images of organization in an introduction course in Organization and Manangement at my first term of a bachelor program in Management. In retrospect I imagine my introduction to this work as a gathering of organizational academics happy for their reunion, passionately discussing organizational theory while opening new bottles of red wine:
-the passion for the subject and their lingual capabilities are reflected in that this work is great litterature.
-the reunion of organizational academics reflects that this is s work of inspiration and perspective widening for the ones that is allready quite familiar with the field. There is not that much room for pedagocial structuring and introducing the ones that is not allready familiar with the scholars and theories presented in this book.
-the work has the form of a academic conversation in the sense that it focus on the subjects that is of interest for the ones present there and then, it does not have a need to make sure it has included all that might should be include or argue why a topic is (not) included.
-the opening of new bottles of red wine reflects that the ideas introduced in this work starts for the traditional, down to earth that is part of any textbook and ends in deary, new thought, that does not mind introducing controversial and far less structures ideas as wore wine is consumed.
I can remember that our first term organization and management course where concluded with an exam case asing us to analyze Mac Donalds on background of the 3 most relevant methafores. It took us some time with puzzeling to conclude that the 3 fairly objective right methafores would be machine, organizm and culture. What we did not fully understand back then was that machine and organizm, with an addition of culture, political system and/or possibly brain is the most central methafores in more or less any practical business case. this is simply the bread and butter content of his work - the rest is facinating, but never the less creme fraiche.
In addition to not being a good choice for an intruduction course in organization, I belive that the following critique is in place:
-What Morgan (and several other scholars using this concept) refers to as the organism methaphore, covers a very wide range of topics with limited things in common. The Human relations school as an anthi-thesis to Scientific Management and the Sosio-technics as some kind of synthesis is one thing. The system approach and OD a school of thinking closer related to corporate strategy. Ant evolution theory is something completely else than the human orienting that he starts out with. Not to wonder this chapter is so much longer than the machine methaphore.
-the mentioned Corporate strategy is a keyword for topics that belong in this book. Mintzberg (as in development of strategic resources not as in structuring in 5's, Ansoff's strategic planning and not to mention Total quality management (and may be business process reengenering) does in dead have their place in this book. I especially miss the flavor that TQM could give to the machine metaphore chapter. I good publisher could identified this shortcomings.
-Especially chapter 7 (Psychological prison) and 8 (change logics) obviously needs to be worked more with. The publisher has simply not made a 100% satisfactory job here. They are among the longest chapters in the book. This is because the material needs to be worked most with, not because they are the most important subjects in the book.
If you have any suspicion that you are interested in Organizational theory - read this book. If you look for a textbook to an introductionary course in Organizational theory - look elsewhere.