I'm a little bit angry with this book. It started off with so much promise. I was getting into it, and even though it was obvious from the beginning that it wasn't going to be a particularly deep book, I was looking forward to a light and entertaining read.
It's too bad I didn't get it. Not Without You is a book that quickly plunges into a variety of absurd and annoying plot devices that annoy you. I hated every moment of Eve's story, which is too bad, because the back cover of the book made me think that it was going to be the most interesting part. I hated the voice that the author chose to give Eve. I think it was what the author imagined someone from the 1950s would sound like, but not at all like any real person, from the 50s or today, would actually sound like. I don't like or care about the Eve/Don Matthews love story, and I found it absurd and over the top that Don would profess his love to Eve after having seen her 3 times. With her reciprocating but regrettably rejecting him. Gross. I don't mind a little romance, but I need at least a tiny bit of realism. The rest of the Eve story arc is disjointed and seems like it was created for the convenience of the story line.
Let's set Eve aside for now and take a look at the main narrator. Sophie Leigh is a big shot actress in Hollywood, but her entire story is supposed to make us feel bad for the stuff she has to put up with and the lack of control she has over her own life. Except I don't feel sorry for her. I feel like she has complete control and is self-sabotaging. Sophie complains about being lonely and having no friends, but she also only goes to one party in the entire book, and bails almost immediately. Somehow, I feel that if she made more effort to actually socialize, she might make some friends. We also learn that Sophie is sleeping with a director, but it's just casual. Still, she's letting him video tape the sex, and she thinks to herself how she's not like those other actresses with their leaked sex tapes. What?! The worst part is, throughout the entire book, we're told how smart Sophie is. People always comment on how they like her, and how she could do so much more than just act. But this is a very bad case of telling, not showing. "Smart" Sophie lets a director she's casually having sex with videotape her without considering the consequences, and she confronts a stalker head on instead of calling the police. That is not smart behaviour at all.
But the videotape is not even a big deal, because the book is ridiculous about leaving loose ends lying around. At first, the videotaping seems like it would be a major plot point in the book, with the evil director threatening to release it, but after Sophie goes to England, we basically never hear about it again. Ditto goes for Sophie's friend Donna, who Sophie initially mentions wistfully, and then immediately forgets about it until she happens to be in England. Given all the talking about Donna in the first chapter, I thought she would feature more prominently in the book. I understand Donna's purpose, as a symbol of Sophie's lost friendships, but I also think that could have been handled more subtly.
Not that anything was subtle about the book. One of the last things I will touch on that pissed me off (and there were many, including the scene where Sophie and Alec have a conversation in Anne Hathaway's cottage just to establish that they are friends without moving the plot forward at all...seriously, the author should have been able show that better) was Sophie's interactions with Eve and Rose. Everything about those conversations was horrible. I don't even really know how to describe it, aside from "real people just DON'T talk like that!" Basically everything Rose said was expositional and convenient, and then Eve handed over a packet of letters from Don, revealing everything Sophie didn't already know, in under 5 minutes? Not to mention that Eve suddenly came out of her shell after a five minute conversation with Sophie enough to come forward to the police AND make a movie? And all the jazz about her memory loss, which I feel was badly portrayed. The author seemed to feel that "memory loss" could be accurately shown just by having Eve say every five minutes "I have terrible memory" or "my memory is fuzzy." I guess it's another case of telling rather than showing.
Alright, I've rambled for long enough, and if you've made it this far, I'm impressed. I would not really recommend this book. It was frustrating and left a bad taste in my mouth when I was done. I like reading light, easy material every once in a while, but this book lacked even basic plot coherence and decent dialogue. There is definitely better light/romance fiction out there, so try something else instead!