In Snapshot by Lis Wiehl we meet Lisa Waldren. She's a federal prosecutor who (if the "modern" book takes place in 2014) is 53. She's widowed, practices in Boston, and has an 18 year old son who is currently at school abroad. We meet her just as she is finishing up a huge win in a multi-state corruption scandal. She's celebrating with long time friend Drew when her Dad calls her from out of the blue.
Her father, James Waldren, is a retired FBI agent who still lives in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. He's resurrecting a cold case from 1965 concerning the execution of a civil rights activist, Benjamin Gray at a rally outside Fort Worth. James was actually present at the rally with his daughter that day. Four year old Lisa sat down on a bench beside another little girl (incidentally black), and James took a picture. This snapshot is featured on the front of the hardback book and has a basis in real life. A young black man was arrested for the shooting, but James feels he is innocent. James wonders if his daughter has retained memories from the rally and shooting in her subconscious, and begs her to come help with the investigation. Lisa struggles with whether or not to help her father. They are estranged, but in the end she decides to go.
Once there, under a looming execution date for Dubois (the fall guy who is most likely innocent), James, his daughter, his friend/girlfriend Rosalyn, and a growing cast of secondary characters work to uncover clues as to what really happened in 1965, and discover who the real killer is. Unfortunately, the reader doesn't really struggle along with them as the probable killer is introduced very early in the book, and no other possible suspect is ever uncovered. For this reason "mystery" is a very shaky category to place this book in.
As my one star rating is very different from the majority of reviews on Good reads, I feel a bit of an explanation is in order. First, let me be clear that the *premise* of the book (outlined in the book description above) is very interesting. I looked forward to reading Snapshot . I feel that Wiehl had a great story to tell, and outlined it well. However the actual telling of the story fell flat. The prose was amateurish, the dialogue was stilted, and Wiehl resorting to telling us what her characters were feeling instead of showing us. It's a subtle difference, but a huge distinction between average and good books. Secondly, as I alluded to above, there is very little actual mystery (and not much thriller either). It's more of a Nancy Drew type feel where the characters follow a bread crumb trail of clues, and their "sleuthing" is supplemented by a lot of lucky breaks. Finally, as another reviewer pointed out, the main premise of the story--that a man was convicted of murder in 1965, and is finally being executed in 2014--is suspect. Props to that reviewer for immersing me in 30+ minutes of research on the death penalty btw. The death penalty was indeed suspended nationwide in 1972. States worked individually on reform to the process of enacting the death penalty, and the first post-suspension execution was in Utah in 1977. However, I can't find a case where anyone whose sentence was converted to life in prison in 1972 was subsequently executed. It seems, then, that Wiehl's story couldn't actually happen. Perhaps there's a loophole I'm missing though.
All that being said, Wiehl has some interesting insights into how much of a difference new technology (such as facial recognition software, and keyword/pattern searches among others) can make in previously cold cases. She also explores repressed childhood memories, and the real, paralyzing fear that blacks felt in the 1960s south. We may think that we as a society have progressed past all that, but in many ways that viewpoint is still a privileged position.
"You young ones don't know how history makes you. It's not just what's a-happenin' now, it's what happened to our family and everyone we heard about for a hundred years before. Such things make up your DNA. You just don't say things have changed and it's alright to be black now and have rights just like everyone else. The fear gets into your bones, and it don't come out so easily."
Bottom line: this is not a bad grab if you are at the library looking for a light, easy read on a trip, and want a novel with some historical background. I wouldn't recommend buying it though. Given 1.5 stars or a rating of "Below Average."