Per the book description, *Firebrand* introduces the life, and early scandals surrounding, preacher J. Frank Norris. Especially for those who are interested in American religion and fundamentalism, it's a good read. I picked the book up when I found it free on Kindle several days ago and blazed (pun intended) through it relatively quickly. Its descriptions of rough-and-tumble Forth Worth and the young, fast-growing Baptist church were interesting.
Unfortunately, I had several concerns with the book:
First, the sources are not clearly cited. Perhaps proper citation doesn't worry most readers, but I am a college teacher who goes over citation twice a year with every writing class, and I teach them that citation is important for two reasons: 1) Interested readers are able to find and read the original sources, and 2) Using correct citation boosts the writer's credibility as an educated, detail-oriented person. Therefore, the sloppy citations in *Firebrand* concerned me. While I realize that the author may not have studied citation since college English, and that editing is harder for Kindle editions, I was surprised to see quotes included without attribution and details supplied about early 20th century Texas and about Norris without their original source; most of the citation is simply a Works Cited at the end of the novel, without any footnotes to link source to information supplied.
Second, I found it difficult to keep track of with whom - if anyone - my sympathies should lie. The author casts sufficient doubt on Norris's actions to make the reader suspect that his true passion is stirring controversy, not building faith; he describes the burgeoning church population and the hellish splits often enough to cast doubt on Norris's pastoral skills, yet Norris's stand against the depravities of Hell's Half-Acre prompted my sympathies to shift from Norris's opponents to Norris himself (Don't get me wrong: I am very different from Norris and love a good drink now and then, but I also realize the corruption of the brothels and saloons in the Old West.) While I realize that original documents only go so far, I would have preferred better closure on the perjury and arson trials: Impossible as it is to determine whether Norris perjured himself and / or burned down his own church, it's difficult to tell whether Stokes thinks Norris at all admirable. That lack of closure makes the book ultimately disappointing.