A very short book, but provide a clear explanation on whether Javanese can be considered philosophy or just a system of value. The author argues that Javanese has a complete set philosophy (ontology, logic, value). However, his argument for logic is weak, as the example that provided from Kanwa to Tantular is not supporting the capability of Javanese to produce a system of logic. This weakness is similar with other Asian (south and east) philosophy which seems lack of logic as argued by Russel. Overall a very good book, easy to read.