To me the most profound and powerful takeaway from this book is the volume of the Early Modern archive and how much of society - sometimes even easily - it can illuminate. That published volumes like the Jodhpur Sanad Parwana Bahais can tell such rich and also disturbing stories is reassuring and the agency to tell important narratives from history is pinned upon the scholar's will and interest to read, more than anything else really.
The book argues very persuasively that state and caste shape each other the former relation by making caste practicable by powerful injunctions - like banishing Muslims, fining untouchables, and outlawing meat and liquor, the latter in the way of the popular currency of Banias (and Brahmins). One of the creative but somewhat controversial moves by Cherian is to argue that Brahmins ought to be placed under the category of the merchant. Cherian shows through analysing state policy and surveying visual art, that a prominent presence through the execution of caste and the making of policy, was exercised by puritanical Vaishnavism and Jainism with their strong ideas of purity and pollution (Cherian thus takes the discussion of caste back to its somewhat classicist roots in Dumont-esque anthropology). This is particularly interesting when one contrasts this model of kingship with more premodern modes where Shaivism due to its "openness" and "moral ambiguities" became the vehicle for Non Kshatriya communities to early legitimacy as kings and divinely ordained at that. However the book is clearly lacking in its engagement with Vallabhite theology. Hence, one can be free to suspect the obviousness of religion's connection with the practice of caste in Marwar.