Okay, here's the thing... if you're going to make mythology queerer, Greek myths are an interesting choice, because the ancient Greeks had a very different view of queerness than the modern West. I was really expecting to enjoy this, because I have a degree in ancient Greek lit and archaeology. I am queer. I was ready.
But the thing is, I don't understand what Gold is trying to add here, or why Greek mythos is the framework. I didn't feel like this particular queering of this mythology was subversive. It didn't feel like it added anything in its execution. And if the poems are meant to be personal (in other words, using the existing mythology to address Gold's own sexuality, rather than the the other way around), then why not use the form more effectively? The Hesiod is referenced, but the poetic form of the Hesiod isn't employed. I don't feel like I came into this anthology with an agenda, although maybe I did, because I was left struggling to understand the reasoning behind this merger.
I know I'm a big ol' Classics dork and could, quite literally, write an essay on why this frustrated me. I didn't feel like the collection was poorly written, so I'm still giving it three stars, but I was actively frustrated by some of the choices here.
My thanks to NetGalley for allowing me to read an ARC in exchange for my honest review. Usually, my three-star ratings are reserved for books that I am utterly lukewarm towards, but in reading this I ended up feeling like that Eric Andre meme, shaking this poetry collection over my head and shouting, "Let me in!" There's something in here, for sure, but it's not working for me.