Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Philosophy of Mind

Rate this book
What is your mind? How is it related to your body? What is the effect of artificial intelligence and information technology? These and many other issues are explored in this book. A historical overview spans the earliest traditions of western philosophy to the broad debates of the 21st century.

176 pages, Paperback

First published January 8, 2002

4 people are currently reading
70 people want to read

About the author

mel-thompson

2 books

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
6 (17%)
4 stars
15 (42%)
3 stars
9 (25%)
2 stars
5 (14%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
Profile Image for Jonathan Hockey.
Author 2 books25 followers
November 4, 2017
A reasonable introduction, just reading to reintroduce myself to the material, but you are better off reading a book by a particular philosopher from his perspective. As these introductions will happily reel off contradictory philosophical positions from one sentence to the next for the sake of trying to represent the range of perspectives out there
Profile Image for Michael Prendergast.
328 reviews1 follower
August 16, 2021
I understood, around, 30% of this book. As an introduction this was an uphill climb and one I will return to again.
Profile Image for JazzyBooks.
108 reviews18 followers
January 4, 2021
I enjoyed the layout of this book - It was sometimes a bit confusing but the summaries at the back were really useful for my research.
Profile Image for Robin.
345 reviews3 followers
April 20, 2014
Despite being too brief to offer a good understanding of any of the many approaches on offer, it still seems arduously drawn-out and unforthcoming. This has less to do with the elusive and sometimes unsatisfying nature of philosophy, and more to do with Thompson's willful disinclination to take a stand on anything meaningful. Her insistence on misrepresenting even the most basic of scientific principles (especially evolution, which is depicted as a directed process trying to achieve human sentience, a nauseatingly incorrect notion) is frustrating throughout, and scuppers whatever paltry arguments she does try to make. Overall the book is quite evidently commissioned by hacks who seem to have instructed the hapless Thompson to be both comprehensive and brief, such that it was not possible for her to achieve either.

If you want a very boring, classroom overview of philosophy, read this book. If you want to know what people doing philosophy actually think, read anything else.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.