Resplendent in armour and heraldry, mounted on a charger in mid-joust or embroiled in close conflict on the field of battle, the figure of the courtly knight has become a defining icon of the medieval period. Yet behind the popular image lies a reality that is both more complex and more fascinating. This book penetrates the layers of myth to reveal the true knight warrior.
From the intricacies of his armour to his 'career path', chivalric code and role in the political and social worlds, Knight explores the milieu of the medieval courtly warrior. It is a lavishly illustrated guide, drawing on first-hand accounts from the knights themselves and bringing to vivid and gritty life battles such as Agincourt and Pavia and individual knights including Geoffrey de Bouillon, William Marshal and Richard The Lionheart.
It's always a challenge for a writer to cover a large span of time and geography when trying to keep succinct and clear on one subject, and this is no different. There is a good general overview of basics and some historical accounts of relevant events, but it's all very cursory. Still, I think it touched on all the important aspects and had great illustrations. It's a good reference book and a good jumping off point if you want to get into medieval chivalry subjects or that period of history. There are certainly some figures and battles I'd like to learn more about after reading of them in here.
It's hard for me to pinpoint what exactly it was that made this book less enjoyable then expected. It was informative, if a bit long-winded in certain areas. The chapter on arms and amour spends a frustratingly exorbitant amount of time on why we know what we do about arms and armour and why it's difficult to know more and not enough time on the connection to the knight. I understand information from the time period must be extremely limited but I just felt it dragged on too long. I don't need the entire history of the sword in order to read how and why knights used them. It was a bit of an overload at times. That said, I am willing to admit the possibility exists that I went into reading the book with a preconceived notion of what to expect and when I didn't get it, I became slightly disgruntled. Not the fault of the author and the book, again, is quite informative, almost textbook like.