First of all, I think this book deserves 0 stars, or maybe half a star.
Emily Mann's play delves into the Dan White murder trial in 1970s San Fransisco. She at every turn forces the audience to view Dan White as a supposed "victim" and justify his actions. But she clearly does not feel this is right because she hamhandedly punches over and over again that Dan White should be viewed as the victim (as he, indeed, was viewed as at the time because he got away with a "light" sentence).
The disjointedness of Mann's play shows an amateur playwright at her worst. Justifications for her slipshod writing range from arguing that she uses "polyphony" or "polyvocalization" in her play, but it comes across as amateurish and lacking any skill or polish. I think these problems could have been fixed with an honest editor, but, perhaps, she was simply too close the subject matter to provide a more nuanced look at Dan White.
She goes for the low-blow in this play and succeeds. She has a good story idea, but awful execution.
Read Emily Mann's play in American Theatre magazine. I think is is one of the best plays of the 80's. It should be produced more. Also saw John Spencer in the Broadway production.