I recall, albeit vaguely, reading this series in high school, deciding that was enough for me, and contenting myself with never reading it again. It had pushed the limit of acceptability for a manga categorized as comedy, I had felt, even if I hadn't been able to quite identify back then what bothered me. But of course, as an adult, things change. I have been asked by one of my mother's friends to screen various manga and anime titles for this friend's 13-year-old daughter, and give general warnings and criticisms about which series contain...eh, we'll call it questionable content. And to be honest with all of you, I am given to the impression much of Ken Akamatsu's work contains questionable content based on my experiences with both Love Hina and Negima!. But, I was asked to give an overview of this, so that's what I'm going to do.
As usual, I already have to say that this series has pretty much gone out of print thanks to being a Tokyopop-licensed title, and as is the unfortunate reality of something under the Tokyopop imprint, the editing of panels, of grammar and dialogue, and general overall physical quality is rather poor and lazy. In the event you want to read this series, you'd better be prepared to scour the internet for scans or shell out money to buy secondhand copies. That being said, this series was plugged with the rating of "OT: Older Teen Age 16+"; personally I struggle with the idea of introducing some of this content even to 16-year-olds.
The general plot of this first volume (and the series overall) is that our protagonist, Keitaro, is trying and struggling hardcore to get into Tokyo University, based on a goal set to a childhood sweetheart that they would meet back up, attend the college together, get married, and live happily ever after. Keitaro has incredible low academic scores however, and has already failed the entrance exam twice, so he decides he's going to leave his parents' home and not come back until he's officially a student at the college (because reasons??) which leads to him seeking out his eclectic grandmother's hotel. Unfortunately when he gets there, through a series of mishaps of the sort involving accidental nudity, flashing, etc., he finds out that the hotel was failing and in order to save it his grandmother turned it into a leased apartment housing complex for young women, called the Hinata House. Most of the residents are younger than him, with the oldest girl being his age, and the rest being middle- and high-school-students. The girls have mixed feelings about him from the start, which only get worse when his grandmother abruptly names Keitaro the new landlord of Hinata House and he's forced to stay there, while the majority of the girls work tirelessly to try to get him to quit and generally physically assault him at every turn.
When I was a teenager, the series seemed generally funny. As an adult, I cringe quite a bit. Not because of the level of ecchi present, per se. Growing up exposed to an over-saturation of anime and manga with the boom of the late 90s-early 00s era, that's very commonplace in the medium, and especially in "comedy" series that focus on a hapless unattractive protagonist surrounded by cute girls. That's not what bothers me; what I have a problem with is the level of misogynistic undertones insisting that Keitaro's constant arousal and fantasizing can't be helped and is perfectly normal for a young man, and that the girls around him at the house are blowing their reactions out of proportion when accidental situations occur where he either sees them exposed or has physical contact with any of them in an accidentally inappropriate manner. Equally annoying is his fantasizing or arousal at the younger girls (the 12-year-old in particular) when situations occur, and how these are rarely addressed at all, and even then only in a comedic "die, pervert!" manner by the other girls that leaves him protesting loudly.
"But Cy!" you may say. "It's just an anime/manga gag. Stuff like that happens all the time, lighten up."
Uh, no. In hindsight, I should never have read this as a teenager myself, and much as I appreciate the various female characters as individuals, I do think it doesn't send a healthy message to any teens (myself included, back in the day!) about the interactions of young men and women. Each of the girls, who range from 12 years old to 19 years old, are constantly objectified throughout the story, and the narrative repeatedly goes out of its way to reassure the audience "oh it's okay, all the situations are accidental, so Keitaro can't help his fantasizing afterward because he's a healthy young man with a sex drive and he's been so sexually repressed you should sympathize with him." I'm not okay with the thought of any teenager reading this and buying into that thought process.
This doesn't make the series itself inherently bad, but I do feel like it detracts a lot from any potential substance the story could have had, at least in the early volumes. Anyone who says that "comedy doesn't need substance" or that it's a slice-of-life comedy, so it doesn't need to be deep or meaningful should probably go through and analyze more comedies and slice-of-life stories. Both comedy and slice-of-life, as well as the genre overlap, can have substance and at its heart, probably should. Going back through this first volume of Love Hina, it has very little substance going for it. The promise Keitaro made to his childhood sweetheart and his struggle and drive to get into Tokyo University almost constantly takes a backseat to the ecchi so we can have shenanigans where he winds up ogling more than a regular at a strip club, takes a clobbering for it, and fantasizes anyway.
If you've never read Love Hina and you're thinking about giving it a shot, and you happen to stumble across this review of mine, I'll be trying to make my way through the whole series for a second time in my life and leaving reviews. Right now I would say don't waste your time unless you've read the first and you're really desperate to know if it gets better, and you can read from an objective standpoint that questions a lot of the thematics and undertones in this story.