I remember when I was reading Judy Blume's Deenie in 2007 (as I never actually did manage to read this novel as a child or a young adult), wondering with rather angry consternation and almost a bit of rage at what ALL the frigging online and offline fuss has been about with regard to the book supposedly describing masturbation. Yes, there is I believe a question posed in Deenie that "might" perhaps be about the latter and which main protagonist Deenie asks at school and indeed, there are also a couple of scenes where she is described as touching herself on a special spot in order to calm her nerves, in order to destress herself mostly whilst she is lying in bed (and why indeed should she not, considering that she has just been diagnosed with scoliosis of the spine and that she also is having to deal with her mother and her mother's best friend who had only ever thought of Deenie as a model, as some kind of fashion queen and who now, after Deenie is being forced to wear a large brace day in and day out for years, have basically and sadly pretty well dropped her like a proverbially hot potato).
And at lesst in my humble opinion, these above mentioned bone of contention scenes in Deenie are absolutely NOT in any manner scenarios that describe sexual perversion or masturbation (for if one actually and with intelligence and an open mind reads these scenes, they are basically simply examples of Deenie using hands on relaxation techniques to self-soothe, to basically with and by physical contact therapy try to take some of her stresses away). And truly, the only individuals who are seeing this as sexual and are wanting Deenie banned for this, are to and for me either reading something, seeing something in the novel that is not even there to begin with or have problematic sexual issues THEMSELVES so that they see anything that is remotely about someone touching themselves in any manner as inappropriate and sexually charged, which is at best really and problematically sad and depressing (not to mention that ANYONE who wants to ban and censor children's and yound adult books and remove them from libraries or classrooms is in my opinion at best a Fascist, a Stalinist, an entitled, undemocratic and dangerously dictatorial ignoramus, for even if Deenie did actually contain scenes of sexuality and gasp, masturbation, it should NOT ever be censored or banned in any manner.
Now is Judy Blume's Deenie a perfect novel about challenges and special needs? No, it is not, but it does very well and with much understanding display how Deenie's entire world seems to fall apart for a while after her scoliosis diagnosis, especially since she really cannot in any way count on her mother for support (who only ever saw and approached her "beautiful" daughter as a potential fashion model and thus really cannot handle what has happened and behaves in a truly selfish and nastily unsupportive manner much of the time), although thankfully Deenie's father is a bit more down-to-earth and understanding towards his daughter, albeit with tough love and a demand that Deenie absolutely follow the doctor's orders with regard to the wearing of her brace (but yes, as much as I have in fact enjoyed Deenie, I do think that at least the mother and her girlfriend, the two individuals most adamantly into categorising Deenie as simply a pretty fashion plate and an opportunity for making money and attending beauty pageants and then freaking out at the fact that Deenie is no longer "perfect" now that she has a curved spine that needs a long and arduous recovery period, have in my opinion been a bit too negatively and onesidedly typecast by the author, have been made by Judy Blume rather too much into arch-villain and arch-ignoramus like entities, although I have to also agree that such individuals actually do in fact and sadly exist). Three and a half stars for Judy Blume's Deenie (rounded up to four stars)! And to and for potential banners and censurers, do grow up a bit and have children and young adults read what they want, as it is profoundly undemocratic (and that is being very much kind) to try to force your attitudes on others (for while you might well have the right to censor your own children's reading choices, you do NOT and legally should absolutely NOT in any way have the right to do this with regard to others).