This is the second book I’ve read in preparation for teaching a session on literature reviews for a doctoral-level course in arts research. Like the other book, this one has good information (more than the other one, actually), along with a lot of content that is just not at all applicable to the ethnographic fieldwork–based dissertations my students are preparing to write. What I like about this book is the introductory chapter about setting up a rigorous system to find and evaluate sources. This is helpful for my students, because the qualitative nature of their humanities research sometimes deemphasizes the need for logical systems like this. The screening methods (practical and methodological) the authors recommend here are useful for my teaching, even if their particular area is not 1:1 applicable. I look forward to working through these issues with my students, and I will encourage them to formulate their own screening considerations.
The first chapter also includes a list of lit reviews that are available online. This is extremely helpful, and it’s exactly what was missing from the other book I read, which never gave any examples of actual lit reviews.
After the first chapter, however, the content moves so far into clinical/medical research specifically that it becomes much less relevant for the work my students are doing. There are general principles that are good across the academic spectrum, but a lot of this book is targeted toward only a small number of research disciplines. The middle chapters leave the topic of lit reviews and instead discuss, in detail, the kinds of research projects that are possible. I wish the book was more general, or that the title was more specific.