Papyrus. P-why-did-I-buy-this
Why does every single review say it’s nothing like the Da Vinci code and that it’s quite stale to read? Well because it’s true. It's more accurately a sexist, racist, one-god-is-best propaganda filled, bore of a book. Dang shame I had to buy this so I could add it to my Ancient Egyptian fiction collection. Heavy emphasis that this book is fiction.
The very first pages are the acknowledgments. Apparently the man who wrote this has been developing it since 1968 when a gasoline company paid for his many trips to Egypt. He apparently wrote this story with the idea that Tiye was Tut’s birth mother, and makes quite the rude claim that he does not believe in the newfangled ideas, technology, and facts that beg to differ. Instead this book is tangled to be a kind of ‘what if’ scenario, quite the gracious way of saying ‘historical fiction’ written by somebody who doesn’t take historical fact into context. In usual fashion of self published writers and people with no historical degree or background, he talks a lot about the process, and how he came to write such a glorious story without you the reader even having opened the book fully.
The story takes place in 1983 and does not fully revolve around ancient Egypt, instead it’s about current day Egypt, Eritrea, and Nubia? It’s about some people named Rica and David, (for the record he tries to sexually assault her immediately in chapter 4, and the book ends with her saying she loves him so there's that) they are trying to find Tiye’s tomb but instead get caught up in a secret police government cross country scandal.
It’s weird to see the book’s take on the Akhenaten monotheism, and by weird I mean biased. Ironically on page 8 a character says “History is vital“. The epilogue even has the audacity to say that the Aten uprising was the pinnacle of Egyptian civilization. It’s a weird mix between the author’s bias and you the reader not being sure if the characters actually care that much for this brand new fake Aten god they’ve barely been introduced to by this old lady. Yet we the audience, are demanded to believe that. That’s right fellow reading audience he does not credit any historical sources at the end.
It’s impossible to talk about Tut’s and Akhenaten’s reign, without discussing ancient Egypt’s religion. The more pagan-multiple-god mythos of the time, was brutally removed and replaced with a singular one. This abrupt change in their belief system caused many to riot, in fact once they went back to their polytheistic ways thanks to Tr wanting to restore balance, the Egyptian people hunted down and removed any and every trace of Aten. How does this book discuss this? By taking the more Christian approach and saying that Aten, the singular God, helped turn Egypt into a utopia, where human rights flourished, how their language changed, and how the art style altered to be more truthful. Gag. But because feminism I guess it wasn’t actually Aten behind all of this, it was Tiye.
I guess you can just keep going with the flow by saying this is an artistic interpretation, whatever. Tiye might also be crazy because she is insisting on being apparently “buried alive” (back in my day we just called it drowning) in oil. For no real reason, Tut is her favorite child and she has chosen him to be special and to share secrets with. There’s only about five chapters with her in it, and the papyrus she leaves behind is the most important part of the book. Its just so flat and un-detailed as to WHY we should care.
The book is mostly filled with military and government jargon about peacekeeping and terrorism, it’s not engaging until characters discover a new mystery to the tomb or when it travels back in time to give you an unnecessary story (that doesn't further the plot) about Tiye. I don’t know how you can write a story about two idiots trying to find a tomb with a drone and equate it to someone trying to overthrow your government. It took them 40 pages before the end of the book to even find the tomb. THAT'S how padded this dreck is.
To one’s real surprise, Rica is kind of the reincarnation of Tiye, and is so overcome with the items of beauty in the tomb that she doesn’t think about helping her own country and wants to keep this old lady‘s items to herself.
The book ends with Rica blowing up the entrance to Tiye’s tomb to thwart her brother and looking on at the sun, believing in Aten. There’s a reason this Aten-awful book is only available on Amazon. May you go with Amun.
This book constantly changes characters POV, for no real reason, it could’ve just stayed in the third person; describing each event; but no, we get like five characters each fighting with one another for their dumb individual plots. Only to end with them finding the tomb and sealing it back up, only for them to hint that Tiye had magic, and only to end with the black lady falling in love with the white man that tried to assault her.
—-
I absolutely love to punish self-published writers. My favorite lazy and poorly written lines are:
“There’s writing under the writing!”
“Wheezing like an old whore.”
“Your brother is a bad man.”
—
After a quick Google search, John Oehler is a white man, surprised? I’m sure you are. Yet he decides to write the black female main character as someone who easily falls in love with a white man who sexually assaults her. Plus we get this gem of male writing prowess:
Page 46: She winced as the brittle edge of the papyrus bit into her nipples, one of the few times she wished she owned a bra.
Granted this scene was her trying to hide the papyrus, but she still got caught with her boobs out. No male character had to hide anything down their crotch with it bumping against their penis. Ugh. Then she sleeps with David, because you know heterosexual sex really drives home a story about finding a tomb. No really it’s a sentence that her being able to find the tomb sexually turned her on.