This book is a no for me and I would not recommend it to anyone else. I’m not entirely sure who this book would be for. It’s filled with helpful bits about the bible that imply that it’s intended for someone who hasn’t read the bible-things like, “Exodus is both a book and an event. As a book, Exodus is situated among the first five books of the Old Testament.” Yet more difficult concepts like “mediator” or “covenant,” are left undefined and bible passages that seem to directly contradict the assertions in the book are left unaddressed, when it seems like those are the questions a beginning bible reader (like myself), would have.
I bought this book for a woman’s book club & they chose it because they thought it would be easily accessible to beginners, but as I am the most recent to come to Christ among them, I feel confident in saying it is not helpful for beginners. This book is about Moses leading God’s people out of Egypt and how God loves to work when things seem darkest. All that is good and enjoyed reading about the Lord’s great works. The book sets a bad example for the new Christian when it then asks you questions like, ‘This chapter focuses on a detour in Moses’ life that took him in a direction that he did not want to go, but ultimately made him more useful to God. Have you ever taken such a detour in your life?’ or similarly, ‘This chapter focuses on a life changing encounter that occurred in Moses’ life. Have you ever experienced such an encounter in your life?’ Undoubtedly readers will think of their own lives as they consider the works of the Lord, but books that are guiding beginners through theology should accustom them to using proper hermeneutics, not focus them inward. Selvaggio makes much of this story about Moses’ personal transformation, relying on assumptions & his own experiences, instead of the bible.
There were 2 main assertions in this book that keep me from recommending it and the first is that the author presupposes (what I assume is) a Klinean view of the covenant. The introduction is devoted to Moses as mediator of the old covenant. Neither mediator or covenant is defined (although the author is sure to carefully define a common colloquial term like ‘Modus Operandi’ a few pages later. “Moses is the most significant Old Testament figure because of his unique role as mediator of the old covenant. Abraham and David were significant covenant figures, but, in old covenant terms, only Moses could claim the role as God’s mediator.” Selvaggio then quoted VOS to support this view, which if you are familiar with Vos on the covenant, is bordering on deceptive. There is a brief mention of 1 Tim 2:5 later, but it is not quoted directly or further mentioned, except as a reference for the reader to look up later. For reference-“For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus,” 1 Timothy 2:5 ESV I also found it ironic that Selvaggio frequently appeals to the WCF other places, not mentioning that the Westminster takes an opposite view of the covenant (WCF ch7).
The second aspect that I found quite distasteful, and basically a violation of the fifth commandment, was the author’s nasty assumptions about Moses when giving an overview of his life in the second chapter. That chapter begins by talking about the 40 years Moses spent in Midian, what Selvaggio calls the “detour.” He says it was necessary for Moses to have a course correction because, “pride crept into Moses’ heart because of his privileged background.” The bible, in contrast, demonstrates that Moses was specially chosen and loved by God, and chose to bear the reproach of Christ even while in Egypt, choosing not to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter. But Selvaggio cheapens this and stands with the grumbling Israelite when he says that Moses acted without the Lord and was punished for it. He repeatedly goes over all the ways Moses acted pridefully. “The end result of this type of pride is set forth for us in Proverbs 16:18, which says, ‘Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall.’ This is exactly what happened to Moses after his prideful actions-he experienced a destructive fall.” Yikes. This does not sound at all like the bible, which says Moses, like Jesus, defended his brothers & avenged them. “He supposed that his brothers would understand that God was giving them salvation by his hand, but they did not understand.” Acts 7. This book relies upon an error explicitly repudiated in scripture. The detour (according to this book) is about making Moses like the Israelites & in Selvaggio’s description there are some concerning postmodern seeds about what identity is and who’s identity is important. Selvaggio mentions Moses’ “detour” as a punishment for Moses, but it was not Moses who was unprepared it was the people of Israel. When a new Pharaoh comes to reign, the people call out to Lord-it seems their sufferings did not end with a new Pharaoh. Now the *people of Israel* are ready for their redeemer & God hears their cry and sends Moses. This is also the view of Matthew Henry & John Calvin in their commentaries on the passage and I commend those to any beginners like myself. People who speak clearly and address the actual bible instead of their personal assumptions and prejudices are what beginners like myself want & need.
The rest of the book for me was filled with similarly alternating emotions-wonderful descriptions of the Lord’s providence and bizarre application I’m guessing is probably related to the author’s view of the covenant. For that reason, as well as many others I haven’t mentioned, I don’t recommend this book. I’m also really bummed many of my favorite authors put rave reviews on the back. Academics are just another breed. “Like manna in the desert.” Really, Sinclair Ferguson? Manna. In the desert. Come on.