What do you think?
Rate this book


453 pages, Mass Market Paperback
First published October 25, 2011
“‘—in vhich case you’d have to eliminate Chaucer, Jane Austen, Dorothy Sayers, and half of Charles Dickens as vell.’
‘But wait,’ Ellery said thrown for a loop, ‘what about the sex?’
‘You’re right. Toss out Shakespeare, Toni Morrison and Philip Roth too.’”
"So you think [romance books] are literature?" Ellery said, grabbing a stray carrot.
"I suppose if vun vuz going to eliminate them from the hallowed world of literature, it would be for their overused plot drivers; the central conceit of characters overcoming impossible odds to fall in love; and happy endings--"
"Exactly."
"--in which case you'd have to eliminate Chaucer, Jane Austen, Dorothy Sayers, and half of Charles Dickens as vell."
"But wait," Ellery said, thrown for a loop, "what about the sex?"
"You're right. Toss out Shakespeare, Toni Morrison and Philip Roth too."
"But--"
"The characteristics you identify vith good literature - unadorned, complex prose, dark themes, moral ambiguity - are constructs of the twentieth century. And," she added with a sly smile in Ellery's direction, "very male-driven." [p.250]
Moore's estimation of her impact on American culture is as overstated as her dress on the book's cover. If romance novels are, as Moore says, "candy conversation hearts that speak to the soul of a woman," let's hope future instructive aphorisms include "There's more plot in the phone book," "Romance Novels: Publishing's Answer to Farmville" and "get a Library Card!"'