This is one of the most poorly written books I've ever started. 7 pages in is enough. But why am I beating on Helene Tursten for her first Inspector Huss novel? She's written more in the series and people have evidently bought them and read them. Some of our own folks here have written positive reviews. Here's my reasons: Scandanavian crime novel authors Jo Nesbo, Asa Larsson, Stieg Larsson, Henning Mankell et al. So much intense writing, so much attention to character development, such limpid prose. Not every writer can measure up to these authors' standards, but this book strikes too wide from the target. Don't take my word on this. Let me point out a few lines:
"She must have sighed audibly, because Superintendent Anderson turned to her and asked, "'Is something bothering you?'"
"No, it's nothing. It's depressing weather. Depressing, with scattered suicides. Depressing. Depressing." The superintendent nodded in agreement and stared gloomily at the black rain {note that this SHOULD be the end of the sentence but,sadly,is not} being flung against the windshield by the gusty wind." What a surprise: rain being flung against the windshield by wind and not by a gigantuan hairdryer.
The tone of each voice is so similar, often without emphasis and certainly without signature wording or behaviors, that they might be speaking for each other.
The actions of most characters, whether minor or major, are given a full if insipid descriptive force. Here, from the very first page after an unnamed man has fallen from a (What? We aren't told.):
"A man in a light-colored coat had just rushed around the car and opened the door on the passenger's side when the old lady with the dachshund started screaming. The man turned quickly, squinted through the rain, and caught sight of the heap nearly thirty meters away. He kept his grip on the door, slowly tilting his head back, and looked up at the top of the imposing apartment building. A faint moaning sound rose from his throat but he kept catatonically still." The man is already on the ground but OUR man in this sentence is faintly moaning at the top of the imposing building. Why? And why is the building imposing? Is it uber tall, is it decorated like a wedding cake, does it have gilded trim? And "catatonically" still?
I get that the author wants to emphasize stillness, but catatonia is also marked by repetitive small movements. The simple word "very" would suit and sound much better.
The next minute gives us a small woman getting out of her car and "running nimbly over to the motionless figure on the ground." Now get this "Her slenderness was emphasized by the stylish Chanel dress she was wearing." WHAT? Why do we care that she was wearing a Chanel dress? Is it important that she has self-indulgent tastes in clothing? Incongruous information like this detracts from the tension the author is trying to build. We've got a screaming old lady and her screaming dog, described as such earlier, plus another person faintly moaning in the background but we need to know about this lady's couture?
Incredibly, Miss Tursten has more to say about this well-dressed wonder woman. "She had mastered to perfection the art of running in high heels. She elbowed her way through the crowd frenetically and reached the inner circle." End of first page. I see this woman behaving like an unsettled stork, flapping through the crowd during a demonstration of her MASTERLY running in high heels. I've run in high heels and I was pretty fair at it. But mastery is not what any woman with a bendable spinal cord has of that activity. Most of us are delighted to complete our journey upright and with both shoes. Arrgh!
I can't recommend this book I can't recommend this writer. But I can pack up my snarkiness and seared sensibilities and take this gem back to the library where another Karin Fossum awaits me. And I can be grateful that here I have a forum in which I can loose my deep disappointment.