Kit Kittredge spends a week of her summer vacation volunteering at the local theater--she wants to write a newspaper article about a play that's opening soon. It even stars famous actors from New York City! But behind the scenes, Kit and her friend Stirling discover more drama than they bargained for. Set in Cincinnati in 1935.
Sarah Masters Buckey was raised in New Jersey and lived in Texas for 15 years. Sarah was nominated for the Agatha Award in 2008 for A Thief in the Theater and in 2005 for The Curse of Ravenscourt. She was nominated for an Edgar Award in 2007 for The Stolen Sapphire.
The great AG marathon continues. Again, reading for the first time as an adult.
As a theater nerd, I was looking forward to this one, so I think my expectations were too high. It's a perfectly fine installment in the series, but it didn't wow me. (MG's backstage mystery was similar.)
The main plot threads here are Kit working on a newspaper story about the theater where one of the boarders works; money problems at the theater compounded by a theft of ticket proceeds; and Stirling being picked on by three brothers while he tries to sell newspapers.
Theater drama is always fun, and I loved that the company is putting on two of my favorite Shakespeare plays, A Midsummer Night's Dream and Macbeth. It felt like a bit of a stretch for Kit and Stirling to hang around there a whole week on the pretense of her short article for the children's corner (and the possibility that he would illustrate it), but the actors have plenty of jobs the kids can help with, so they keep busy and get very invested in everybody's business. Ultimately, of course, Kit helps to catch the culprit. The thief and their motives really aren't very interesting, but it's the Depression, so needing money is true for everyone.
A few quibbles: - Stirling and Kit are working for two different papers, which seems like an opportunity for friendly rivalry or some useful clue coming from the fact that they're close to two different papers, but nothing comes of it.
- Possibly I have a heart of ice, but Stirling's plotline with the bullies just didn't interest me.
- Ruthie's out of town, leaving Kit to watch her fish. What would this book look like if Ruthie were part of the action?
- Kit spends all this time reporting and writing a story on this theater, and all we ever get is the first paragraph. I wanna see what she came up with!
Here's what saved it: - Kit. An aspiring reporter is just a great hat for a kid detective, and her temperament is a good fit.
- They may not have been interesting, but I didn't guess the culprit at all.
- The whole sword fighting practice scene and the later revelation connected to it were good fun.
I would give it 3.5 stars. It was a good, engaging storyline that didn't quite go where you were expecting it to go. However, it did make it seem like it was ok to lie ("act"/"bluff") if it was for a good cause.
probably rating this higher then it deserves but like. come on. it's a kit book and it has theater at the heart of it. of course i had fun. and stirling gets to be a big part of the plot which is always nice.
i didn't really gaf about the bullies that stirling was dealing with - they felt really clunky and unnecessary to the plot, and i feel like they could have been cut easily.
This is a fun, light mystery that focuses on a 1930s theater and its performance of Macbeth. Kit and Stirling get involved in a totally realistic and convincing way, since she is planning to write her next children's page newspaper article about the theater, and since one of her family's boarders is an actor there. The kids help the actors get ready for the production, solve a mystery involving stolen money and continual accidents, and resolve a subplot related to kids who were bullying Stirling on his newspaper route.
The story makes it easy to suspend disbelief, shares lots of interesting information about theater during the Great Depression, and has some good twists. Even though this was never one of my favorites, I enjoyed reading it again, and I appreciated it even more as an adult, since I now know a lot more about Shakespeare and have friends who are very invested in theater.
Finally, after buying this in 2013 at the American Girl store in NYC, I finally have an excuse to read it for school - an awesome BYU writing course.
I've loved Kit's world ever since I got the doll when I was six. Walking back into it fifteen years later was amazing. I love the simplicity of the story, even though it was set in the tumultuous 1930's. I predicted the reveal about a third of the way though the book, but I still enjoyed it. Five stars because I'm so in love with Kit's world. No shame. XD
This book had me wondering the whole time who was the thief in the theater. I thought one person, but then something else in the book told me that it could have been another person. In the end, it ended up being someone I would have never though of. The plot flowed great, and all the elements to solving the mystery was right in front of you, you just had to put the pieces together. I would have never thought that the thief was the thief, and that is one of the main reasons why this book is so good!
Kit is my favorite of the American Girl book characters, because of her wonderful core series written by Valerie Tripp. And I am especially fond of mysteries, so I thought this would be a slam dunk!
But A Thief in the Theater was ultimately quite disappointing. The Kit in this book isn't the one I know and love - in fact, she's written the same way as this author wrote Samantha in Danger in Paris. Kind of bland and nondescript. The mystery wasn't very involving, and most annoying of all (for me, as somebody who has acted in many plays), the entire premise of the theatre director announcing the closing of A Midsummer Night's Dream to the audience after a performance (without having told anybody involved with the play beforehand!), and then announcing that they will now be doing Macbeth "next week" instead, is completely absurd. There is absolutely no way any theatre company would or could do a show that quickly. Three or four weeks of preparation would be pushing it for a show like Macbeth. The author obviously knew absolutely nothing about the theater.
This completely absurd plot point that was totally unnecessary (why not just have the play they're rehearsing be Macbeth from the very beginning?) made it impossible for me to buy anything else the author wrote going forward. Which is death to fiction!
Overall, an extremely lackluster book that I cannot recommend.
Wow! I must say I was very impressed with this book! I have been disappointed in some of the other American Girl mysteries, but not this one! It was very entertaining and I also felt educated as it progressed.
My only concern in this book (as mentioned in the additional notes) is that a character tells a lie but does not meet any repercussions for it. This was frustrating to me because it made me ask what sort of example this book is setting for its young readers.
Despite this, I still thoroughly enjoyed this book!!
Things to be aware of in “A Thief in the Theater”
Language: - 2 forms of “gosh” or “oh my gosh” - 1 “stupid”
Violence: - A few characters engage in a fight and one ends up with a black eye.
Spiritual Content: - There are many mentions of curses, jinxes and luck.
Additional Notes: - There are bullies who steal from a few characters in this book. - A main part of this book is centered around Shakespeare’s plays, some of which include spells and witches. - A character lies (to protect another character) and does not meet repercussions.
I enjoyed this book. It is about Kit, a nine year old girl from Cincinnati living during the Great Depression. In this story, Kit is a writer for a childrens column for the Cinncinnati Register. Her friend Sterling, a border in her home, is selling papers for the Cinncinnati Daily Register. He is being bullied by three brothers that rob him of his money each time. Kit agrees to stand with him while selling to keep an eye out for trouble during his free time. Meanwhile another border, Mr. Bell, works at the theater invites the both of them to see him in act in Shakespeare play at the local theater. This opportunity is to allow Kit to write about it for her column. But even though the play transports her into a magical world, the evening ends in tragedy when it is discovered someone has stolen the box office money, threatening the new play they had planned on performing in a week. As I said I enjoyed this book. Its great for fans of American Girl Dolls. It also is longer than most of books in the Kit line. More advanced readers will be happy in its length.
I am older than the age range for this book. I've never been "into" the American Girl dolls. I do think I might have read one other American Girl book (about a different character).
The book started off slowly for me but it did get interesting. I enjoyed learning about what a theater was like in 1935 and what it takes to put on a play.
I didn't understand why Stirling and/or Vinnie didn't tell an adult about the bullies--and adult who could help them.
I didn't guess who the thief was until it was revealed.
Not my favorite of Kit's stories, nor of the American Girl mysteries, but it was decent. I wanted more ambiance, more "theater magic" (if you will) as it felt more like a mystery set in a theater than a theater story with a mystery. (I think that Rebecca mystery, The Showstopper: A Rebecca Mystery, was better at capturing the "vibe" I wanted, though there we are getting into cinema.)
This book was kind of boring. I don’t things I’ll reread it. I’ve had it for the past 4.5 years, and it’s just not really my type of book. The font is too big, there’s not really a big plot, and the characters don’t have a lot of personality to them. The only thing that kept me reading past the 60 page mark was me not wanting to only read a third of this tiny book when I knew I could finish the rest in under an hour.
I bought this for by granddaughter's tenth birthday. She had just been in a play, and this book is about a girl and a boy who become involved with a play. It was a good read where I didn't figure out the mystery. A bonus is the "Looking Back" section at the end of the book about the '30s time period that this book was set in--complete with pictures from that era.
this was really enjoyable!! idk if it's cause i was coming off peter pan which i found a bit more of a slump to get through but the general atmosphere was really well written and engaging. stirling having some independence from his mother and learning to stand up for himself was really nice to see. and the actual resolution to the mystery wasn't something i saw coming, which was nice!! good read.
This book is a good way for children to get a sense of the 1930s-1940s. It is easy to relate to, making it more appealing to young readers! I personally like the book and I think it does a good job of portraying life back then.
Pretty good story love the books in the series and the excitement of the theater back then is incredible love that everyone got to experience the theater and get their minds off hard times Beautiful stories love the books
I feel like there were so many loose ends not tied at the end. Sure, the "main" mystery was solved, but we never learned why Mr. Bell had the Kit's money, and why he was acting so shady.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
Strange things are happening at the theater, but that's not all - Kit's friend is being bullied by 3 boys in the neighborhood. Can you help Kit and her friend overcome their fears?