(September 2015: 3 stars)
I enjoyed the book, though I can't say I would be in any hurry to read it again. I don't know whether it was spoilt for me or improved by having seen an old TV series which followed the story very closely and captured the characters and the atmosphere very well - knowing what was going to happen took much of the suspense out of reading what was quite a long-winded, slow-moving, and repetitive book. A promising start - it's the first Arthur Ransome book I've read and I wouldn't be averse to reading some more.
(March 2022: 4 stars)
It's six and a half years since I first read The Big Six and I still enjoyed it. Possibly I liked it more this time for reading it in a nicer edition (hardback instead of paperback). Also, I am now more familiar with the two D's, whereas at the time I first read it, it was the first Arthur Ransome book I had ever read and I didn't realise who were or who weren't regular characters in the series. I'm only sorry that I have only one more book in the series left to read, and that that will also be concerned with the same characters, and that I have no fresh adventures of the Swallows and Amazons to look forward to.
But this book is still frustratingly, almost embarrassingly, slow and repetitive, and to some extent one wonders why Ransome was allowed to get away with it, why an editor didn't pull him up on it and abridge it. The number of times the clues and evidence was recounted, sometimes within just a few pages, was painful, and could easily have been cut out, and likewise all the suspicious conversations parents had with their children. It probably would have been far stronger and more exciting as a 350- or 370-page book than as a 400-page one.
(February 2025: 3 stars)
It's nearly three years since I last read The Big Six. This is perhaps one of the slightly more problematic books for me. As always, I like the characters, I like the atmosphere, I like the feel and appearance of the book. But I have grown too familiar with the story from the TV version. And as I commented last time, some of it feels tediously repetitive and bit of editorial refinement wouldn't have gone amiss. It is also frustrating how stupid the adults can be - the men especially as the women tend to be more perceptive. But when everyone previously believed the boys to be such perfectly honest and reliable and trustworthy characters, it's hard to see how everyone could suddenly turn on them so suddenly, so vehemently, and not believe a word that they say. For me that stretched the bounds of credibility. They should have at least have been allowed to have Jim Wooddall on their side. For even the Eelman to believe the allegations against them was painful to behold. If memory serves correctly it feels like Dick and Dorothea were the only characters in the whole book who didn't entertain a doubt or ever have the slightest suspicion that any of the boys might have done the things of which they were accused. Even the Death and Glories and Tom suspected each other at the start, which seemed ridiculous. The owner of the Cachalot and the pike episode was the one (and only) really bright spot in whole book, a refreshing - and much needed - break from all the misery and suspicion and speculation and hurt and frustration. I guess the thing to be thankful for is that, when reading the books in chronological order, this book falls somewhere in the middle, so that there are better and brighter things to look forward to.