Let me start by saying that I was going to rate this 3 stars until the ending sentence. I did like this book, though. Like the first one, I was slightly disconnected by the mentions of places like Spain and outlying European nations in a history altered land, but not as much in this book as the second. The reference to "Spaniard" or "French" styles, though, didn't bother me, because reading it in third person, I can relate to those things.
I felt pretty confident that I liked the first book more than this one, but at times I liked it as much, and others I liked it more. It's like being in a confusing relationship, sometimes! That said, this book was definitely more involved in the realm as a whole, and the story took deeper roots that were interesting to travel upon. Following less parties than the first book, The Cobweb Empire focus was predominately on Percy and Beltain, Lady Amaryllis, Lord Nathan and company, and The Sovereign. It is also quite a bit darker, and you start find answers to questions laid in the first book about why Death stopped doing his job (well, more about this, since you find out in the first, technically...), the true reason he cannot find his Cobweb bride, and who is Cobweb bride truly is.
What did I love about this book? Percy and Beltain. I was rooting for Percy in the first book, and I am so glad that she was such a big part of the second book. "Death's Champion", Percy's character is expanded upon, and the interactions between Percy and Beltain were my favorite to follow. Anytime the story switched to somebody else, I found myself rushing toward it a little to get back to that pair. I'm really hoping that they are predominate in the next book, as well! Which I'll begin reading as soon as I finish this review and snatch it off of B&N. :)
What I didn't like about this book? I love descriptive text. I'm a Robert Jordan fan, and anyone who has ever read him knows that he describe for pages at a time, sometimes. Which, you get to a point where you are like, okay .. I get it. I found that happening to me in this book. Vera is great with analogies and descriptions, and really setting a visual to what you are looking at, but sometimes those things can be said in less words, especially when they are repeated descriptions. I swear, if I had to read "pomegranate" one more time, I was going to throw my Nook! (and I love my Nook quite a bit...). And the excessive use of telling me that people are taking a dump or tinkling in their chamberpots or in the wild. I sighed every time I read it. Maybe that's just me being ridiculous. After all, sometimes you'll watch a show or read a series and wonder silly things like that, "Do these people ever use the bathroom!? Eesh!" "I swear, I've read two books in this series and they haven't stopped to eat once." but ... I get it. They wake up and use the potty, they travel a long time and use the potty ... I know, I know, maybe I am silly! I am. But those are the two things that made me pull my hair sometimes! And I laugh at myself for complaining about it.
They are trivial things to complain about, because it was a good book, but I do think it is something that can take away from the reading experience in prolonged use. That expressed, Vera wrote another great book. Unique, interwoven with historical and mythological effects, I enjoyed being along for the literal journey of these characters. I love characters and I hated characters, and I like that. It means I FELT something for them, whether it was negative or positive. The entire book could simply follow Percy, and I would be content with that, but she does do a good job of moving between the different view points and tying the stories together. I feel like the Infanta and the Marquis story was stopped suddenly, but I have a feeling that was for a reason pertaining to the final book of the series.
So on to the next one I go! So onward, Percy. On to our next adventure, shall we?