Take a gander at screen portrayals of medieval women, and you'll often find the picture of a woman who is completely steam-rolled by the culture of the time, destined for a life of frilly dresses and servitude to men. Is this really how it was...or were there women who would have made Susan B. Anthony proud? Well, let's see....
The Good
If my history books had been this interesting, I would have been far less bored and paid a lot more attention. = )
This book was just plain fun to read. Rank (both of them) covered a whole bunch of stuff about each of the women here presented. We learn a bit about their culture, history, familial history, etc. We learn a smidge about their personality and what made them tick. We learn scads about their accomplishments and why those accomplishments were such a gosh-darned big deal!
When we picture women in the middle ages, we often get a picture of some frilly lady who would rather die than squash a bug with her bare hands. Rank posits that this image is rather fictitious, and then presents 10 women who defy even modern standards of female behavior and expectations (let's face it, suffrage still has a long way to go...but I'll stay off that soap box for now). One woman led armies at that "delicate" young age of 17. Another ruled through sons and grandsons in a culture where women today are treated very poorly. yet another influenced culture even today!
Rank has produced a book here that delves into the personal, sociological, political, and geographical history of some of the most influential women in the middle ages. They have done so in way that is entertaining without being dismissive, interesting without losing impact, and engaging without dancing around the facts. Their writing style flows extremely well, contains an appropriate level of snark, and kept me reading despite the fact that there is little plot to speak of (c'mon...this is, after all, a history book).
Were I to teach a history class that included these women, I'd include this book as required reading.
The Bugly (bad/ugly)
As much as I like the book, I didn't like everything about it.
I get that it is a short work meant to introduce the women who are featured, but it felt like this was a buzz-by. You know that feeling when you meet someone, feel like you've known them for ages, talk for about 5 minutes, and then never see them again despite the fact that they were intensely interesting? This is how I felt at the end of each chapter. I had just gotten to know enough about the person to want to continue our "conversation" and then was introduced to someone else (not a feeling unlike that I'm sure some experience during speed-dating). This reader wanted longer chapters...more character development. :P More details, please (keep in mind that everywhere in life I'm often the one asking for more details...during a job performance review, one supervisor stated that her major complaint was that I'm too detailed)!!
How was this list formulated? Surely a list putting forward "the most powerful women in the middle ages" was debated. We get a little bit of the story about how this list was made, but again - more details, please! (Okay, maybe I'm just getting a tad pedantic).
Finally, there were typos/obvious missing words. Enough that I was derailed a bit. Not too badly, but this is an editing issue.
OVERALL - I give this book a 4 out of 5!!