I was quite excited for this book and to begin with very intrigued and also found some of the exercises interesting. I didn’t get very far though before I started feeling a bit confused by some of the writing and exercises, and the book as a whole, as I felt like it was jumping around, leaving out details, not explaining things well, contradicting itself, and just weirdly structured, so it was hard for me to follow along and feel connected to it and like I was actually part of a/the journey, but felt more like I was witnessing and being told, in a fragmented way, of others’ journeys and experiences.
And then there was the sometimes condescending tone and stance that put me off.
And the direct or indirect dogmatic approach of ‘this is the only and right way’ that simply goes against my belief system. I don’t believe in any one right way and any teacher/teaching or person that claims so, does not have me on board. And I also disagree with the notion that we are to simply strive towards emptiness, dissolving, formlessness, annihilation of form and ego and self, as I don’t think that is either possible or what we are here to do. I believe we are here in human form to experience and play with and learn and grown from that, but that having a body and a form and beliefs and ideas and a self and an individuality is part of that journey when we are incarnate - I believe we incarnate as humans and in this form BECAUSE it comes with a certain set of tools and limitations and thereby possibilities, that we can learn a lot from. So all this focus on and striving towards the ultimate goal seemingly being to become non-human, to dissolve and shed our humanness, I totally disagree with. For me it’s a no that being human is bad and we need to escape that, transcend that. I believe we need to embrace our humanness, integrate it, be more compassionate with ourselves and each other and understand the human parts better to work with both soul aspects as well as human, ego, bodily aspects. All is divine, all is worthy of love. And sometimes in the book it seems to say so, and then sometimes it seems to say the opposite, and be condescending to people being people on a human journey.
Maybe it’s because the book is written by 2 (or more?) people that it seems hard for me to follow and lacking and overall comprehensive structure and message. I’m not sure, but I’m not a fan of it as an overall piece. There are passages throughout that I agree with and resonated with and found good, and interesting and inspiring, but judging it and reviewing it here as a whole, that does not make up for the overall experience of reading it and the parts I strongly disagree with.