What do you think?
Rate this book
Robert Kennedy and His Times
The Pulitzer Prize–winning historian chronicles the short life of the Kennedy family’s second presidential hopeful. Schlesinger’s account vividly recalls the forces that shaped Robert Kennedy, from his position as the third son of a powerful Irish Catholic political clan to his concern for issues of social justice in the turbulent 1960s. Robert Kennedy and His Times is “a picture of a deeply compassionate man hiding his vulnerability, drawn to the underdogs and the unfortunates in society by his life experiences and sufferings” ( Los Angeles Times ). This fortieth anniversary edition contains not only Schlesinger’s illuminating and inspiring portrait of Robert Kennedy, but a new introduction by Michael Beschloss, in which the acclaimed bestselling author and historian discusses the book’s initial reception, Schlesinger’s thoughts on it, and expounds on why Robert Kennedy is still such an important figure today. “Exceptionally important, one of a handful of books that anyone who cares for the politics of the ’ 60s must read.” — Newsweek “An absorbing and vividly written study of a gallant and tragic man.” — The Boston Globe “A story that leaves the reader aching for what cannot be recaptured.” — Miami Herald “An inspiring account of what it was like to be at Robert Kennedy’s side and why he and many like him felt that vision and virtue walked with them.”— Business Week
1092 pages, ebook
First published January 1, 1978
271 people are currently reading
3603 people want to read
About the author
Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr.
670 books219 followersArthur Meier Schlesinger Jr., born Arthur Bancroft Schlesinger, was a Pulitzer Prize recipient and American historian and social critic whose work explored the liberalism of American political leaders including Franklin D. Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy, and Robert F. Kennedy. He served as special assistant and "court historian" to President Kennedy from 1961 to 1963. He wrote a detailed account of the Kennedy Administration, from the transition period to the president's state funeral, titled A Thousand Days. In 1968, he actively supported the presidential campaign of Senator Robert F. Kennedy until Kennedy's assassination in the Ambassador Hotel on June 5, 1968, and wrote the biography Robert Kennedy and His Times several years later.
He popularized the term "imperial presidency" during the Nixon administration by writing the book The Imperial Presidency.
His father was also a well-known historian.
He popularized the term "imperial presidency" during the Nixon administration by writing the book The Imperial Presidency.
His father was also a well-known historian.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 97 reviews
December 16, 2022
Robert Kennedy and His Times by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. was first published in 1978, but in my hands, I hold the beatiful Fortieth Anniversary Edition 2018 and winner of the National Book Award. It has a beautiful introduction by Michael Beschloss. And his most poignant words is that one is about to read a book about a close and devoted friend doing an excellent job of showing us those qualities: Robert Kennedy's compassion and idealism; his concern for civil rights and the dispossessed; his hatred of corruption; his demands for a carefully crafted foreign policy, and his sense of humor and irony. And Schlesinger generously acknowledges the generosity of Ethel Kennedy in permitting him unrestricted access to the papers of Robert F. Kennedy, as well as the Kennedy family permitting him access to the collection of family papers.
This is a book that touches on the biography of the Kennedy family beginning with the patriarch Joseph Kennedy. There is a large part of the book that is devoted to the relationship between the two brothers, Jack and Bobby. Although they were separated by many years, they later formed a very strong bond, never stronger than when Bobby ran the victorious campaign for Jack Kennedy at the end of 1951 when he challenged popular Republican senator, Henry Cabot Lodge, Jr. in Massachusetts. It was at this point that John Kennedy realized the tremendous ability and talent of his brother. And also he realized how important Bobby would be in his campaign for the presidency of the United States and in his administration. Schlessinger takes us through the first three years of Kennedy's presidency exploring all of the issues that were addressed by this administration, including the Bay of Pigs, the critical Cuban Missile Crisis, and the beginnings of the Vietnam conflict. As all of these issues were being dealt with by this young administration, it became apparent that there were decided differences. Contrary to what most believed, Robert Kennedy was a man of poetry and idealism reflected so poignantly in this quote:
And then that tragic day in Dallas, November 22, 1963 when lives were upended by the horror, shock and pain of the assassination of our young, promising, and vital president. Robert Kennedy was notified while at Hickory Hill with his family by J. Edgar Hoover that his brother was dead. In the aftermath of the bringing back of the president's body, his shattered widow Jacqueline Kennedy, and the newly sworn-in president, Lyndon Johnson, Robert Kennedy not only handled all of the arrangements but he still found time to write letters to each of his children. Discipline and duty summoned him to the occasion but this was a desparately wounded man. It was observed by his father's nurse, Rita Dallas, that as he made his way through the haze of pain he brought other sufferers insight and relief.
Before the convention in Atlantic City in 1964, President Johnson was still unsure about the security of his nomination but seeing no signs of a Kennedy insurrection, Johnson and Humphrey had secured the nomination. But there was still a tribute scheduled for John Kennedy with a film that Robert Kennedy was to introduce. Jacqueline Kennedy had given Bobby a quote from'Romeo and Juliet to include as follows:
As the war in Vietnam, continued to escalate under President Johnson, one was forced to reflect back to the administration of John Kennedy who had once said privately that he thought the United States had been "overcommitted" in Southeast Asia. These words are particularly poignant and relevant:
Robert Kennedy remained with the Johnson administration for quite a while, the reasons clear in this quote:
But as the war in Vietnam escalated, Robert Kennedy eventually he felt that he had to break with the administration and speak out on the issue of Vietnam. Kennedy believed that Johnson was hell-bent on smashing his way to military victory and indifferent to its human consequences. A wonderful quote reflecting the differences between the beliefs of Johnson and Kennedy:
And so President Lyndon Johnson was not surprised at the announcement when Robert Kennedy declared his candiadacy for president in the upcoming 1968 election running against Senator Eugene McCarthy as well. Johnson told his biographer Doris Kearns Goodwin that he felt that he was being chased on all sides by a giant stampeded but the thing that he had feared the most was that "Robert Kennedy had openly announced his intention to reclaim the throne in the memory of his brother. And the American people, swayed by the magic of the name, were dancing in the streets."
Robert Kennedy learned of the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. in Memphis while he was enroute to a campaign rally in Indianapolis. Despite being advised against appearing, as Kennedy's car entered the ghetto, the police escort left him. There Kennedy climbed onto a flatbed truck in a parking lot under a stand of oak trees. Television news correspondent, Charles Quinn reported: "He was up there hunched in his black overcoat, his face gaunt and distressed and full of anguish." Kennedy then imparted to the crowd that Martin Luther King had been shot and killed. It has been described that he spoke out of aching memory and out of the depth of heart and hope. It is a beautiful speech but one of the most memorable parts for me was:
Robert Kennedy continued to run his campaign across the nation, rising to the top of the pack. After a victory in a California primary, while taking a shortcut through the hotel kitchen for a press conference, Bobby Kennedy was shot, later succumbing to his injuries. Before dawn Friday morning, long lines began to form around St. Patrick's Cathedral, followed by the funeral mass the next morning with a moving speech by Edward Kennedy. Later the train made its long journey to Washington that night as mourners gathered with twinkling candles as they followed the coffin into Arlington Cemetery. "There was," wrote a grieving Lady Bird Johnson, "a great white moon riding high in the sky."
This is a book that touches on the biography of the Kennedy family beginning with the patriarch Joseph Kennedy. There is a large part of the book that is devoted to the relationship between the two brothers, Jack and Bobby. Although they were separated by many years, they later formed a very strong bond, never stronger than when Bobby ran the victorious campaign for Jack Kennedy at the end of 1951 when he challenged popular Republican senator, Henry Cabot Lodge, Jr. in Massachusetts. It was at this point that John Kennedy realized the tremendous ability and talent of his brother. And also he realized how important Bobby would be in his campaign for the presidency of the United States and in his administration. Schlessinger takes us through the first three years of Kennedy's presidency exploring all of the issues that were addressed by this administration, including the Bay of Pigs, the critical Cuban Missile Crisis, and the beginnings of the Vietnam conflict. As all of these issues were being dealt with by this young administration, it became apparent that there were decided differences. Contrary to what most believed, Robert Kennedy was a man of poetry and idealism reflected so poignantly in this quote:
"Robert Kennedy began as a true believer. He acquired his perceptions of the complexity of things partly because his beloved older brother led him to broader views of society and life and partly becasue his beloved older brother led him to broader views of society and life and partly because he himself possessed to an exceptional degree an experiencing nature. John Kennedy was a realist brilliantly disquised as a romantic; Robert Kennedy, a romantic stubbornly disguised as a realist."
And then that tragic day in Dallas, November 22, 1963 when lives were upended by the horror, shock and pain of the assassination of our young, promising, and vital president. Robert Kennedy was notified while at Hickory Hill with his family by J. Edgar Hoover that his brother was dead. In the aftermath of the bringing back of the president's body, his shattered widow Jacqueline Kennedy, and the newly sworn-in president, Lyndon Johnson, Robert Kennedy not only handled all of the arrangements but he still found time to write letters to each of his children. Discipline and duty summoned him to the occasion but this was a desparately wounded man. It was observed by his father's nurse, Rita Dallas, that as he made his way through the haze of pain he brought other sufferers insight and relief.
"He was now the head of the family. With his father stricken, his older brothers dead, he was accountable to himself. The qualities he had so long subordinated in the interest of others--the concern under the combativeness, the gentleness under the carapace, the idealism, at once wistful and passionate, under the toughness--could rise freely to the surface. He could be himself at last."
Before the convention in Atlantic City in 1964, President Johnson was still unsure about the security of his nomination but seeing no signs of a Kennedy insurrection, Johnson and Humphrey had secured the nomination. But there was still a tribute scheduled for John Kennedy with a film that Robert Kennedy was to introduce. Jacqueline Kennedy had given Bobby a quote from'Romeo and Juliet to include as follows:
When he shall die
Take him and cut him out in little stars
And he will make the face of heaven so fine
That all the world will be in love with night,
And pay no worship to the garish sun.
As the war in Vietnam, continued to escalate under President Johnson, one was forced to reflect back to the administration of John Kennedy who had once said privately that he thought the United States had been "overcommitted" in Southeast Asia. These words are particularly poignant and relevant:
"Kennedy had no intention of dispatching American ground forces to save South Vietnam. Nor did he accept the Truman-Eisenhower-Pentagon view that a President had inherent authority to send an expeditionary force into battle. If combat troops 'in the generally understood sense of the word'--units, not advisers--were required in Vietnam, he told a press conference in March 1962, that would be 'a basic change. . . which calls for a constitutional decision, [and] of course I would go to the Congress."
"In July 1962. . . . Kennedy instructed McNamara to start planning for the phased withdrawal of American military personnel from Vietnam. The assumption was that South Vietnamese troops would take up the slack as their capabilities improved under American training. The target date for complete disengagement was the end of 1965. After several tries, the military produced an acceptable plan in May 1963."
Robert Kennedy remained with the Johnson administration for quite a while, the reasons clear in this quote:
"At the start Lyndon Johnson gave mighty impetus to the twin stars against poverty asnd racial inequality. So long as the Great Society absorbed the President, there was strong reason for Kennedy, despite differences on foreign policy, not to break with the administration."
But as the war in Vietnam escalated, Robert Kennedy eventually he felt that he had to break with the administration and speak out on the issue of Vietnam. Kennedy believed that Johnson was hell-bent on smashing his way to military victory and indifferent to its human consequences. A wonderful quote reflecting the differences between the beliefs of Johnson and Kennedy:
"Robert Kennedy saw Vietnam, not in abstractions but in images--a village smashed, children scorched, the mother clasping the baby while fire rained inexplicably from the sky. This compulsion to be at one with individuals in extreme situations was increasingly the key to his politics."
And so President Lyndon Johnson was not surprised at the announcement when Robert Kennedy declared his candiadacy for president in the upcoming 1968 election running against Senator Eugene McCarthy as well. Johnson told his biographer Doris Kearns Goodwin that he felt that he was being chased on all sides by a giant stampeded but the thing that he had feared the most was that "Robert Kennedy had openly announced his intention to reclaim the throne in the memory of his brother. And the American people, swayed by the magic of the name, were dancing in the streets."
Robert Kennedy learned of the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. in Memphis while he was enroute to a campaign rally in Indianapolis. Despite being advised against appearing, as Kennedy's car entered the ghetto, the police escort left him. There Kennedy climbed onto a flatbed truck in a parking lot under a stand of oak trees. Television news correspondent, Charles Quinn reported: "He was up there hunched in his black overcoat, his face gaunt and distressed and full of anguish." Kennedy then imparted to the crowd that Martin Luther King had been shot and killed. It has been described that he spoke out of aching memory and out of the depth of heart and hope. It is a beautiful speech but one of the most memorable parts for me was:
"My favorite poet was Aeschylus. He wrote: 'In our sleep, pain which cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart until, in our own depair, against our will, comes wisdom through the awful grace of God.'"
Robert Kennedy continued to run his campaign across the nation, rising to the top of the pack. After a victory in a California primary, while taking a shortcut through the hotel kitchen for a press conference, Bobby Kennedy was shot, later succumbing to his injuries. Before dawn Friday morning, long lines began to form around St. Patrick's Cathedral, followed by the funeral mass the next morning with a moving speech by Edward Kennedy. Later the train made its long journey to Washington that night as mourners gathered with twinkling candles as they followed the coffin into Arlington Cemetery. "There was," wrote a grieving Lady Bird Johnson, "a great white moon riding high in the sky."
October 11, 2018
The 50th anniversary of Robert Kennedy’s assassination seemed an appropriate occasion to read Arthur Schlesinger’s epic biography, ‘Robert Kennedy and his Times’. Sufficient time has elapsed where one can take a dispassionate look at the man and at the era which he helped to define.
Or perhaps not. The Kennedys continue to evoke strong passions, pro and con. Their merits, and flaws, remain the subject of debate to this day.
What impressed me most about RFK - perhaps the dominant impression I took away from this biography - was his ability to grow and mature as a person and a man. He was never a static figure, nor one unaware of his own shortcomings. Though born to wealth and privilege, he was able to move beyond this, able to broaden his horizons and deepen his empathy, to the point where he became conversant with the broad spectrum of struggling humanity, able to walk in their shoes and relate to their problems and concerns.
Such a thing could never be said of such contemporary politicians as G. W. Bush or John Kerry - men of wealth and privilege who never seemed able to shed their limitations and, perhaps, never even recognized them as such. RFK stood head and shoulders above such figures - and, indeed, above most politicians, of whatsoever background or party affiliation.
Schlesinger’s biography, it must be said, is far from being an impartial look at Robert Kennedy. Schlesinger knew, respected and admired RFK and makes a case that the reader should share in these feelings. The book sometimes reads like a presentation offered by defense counsel, though always polished and persuasive.
Indeed, Schlesinger’s erudition, the broad expanse of his intellect, his ability to marshal facts and details to buttress some argument, would, were it not so congenial, be more than a little intimidating. The author is a self-professed intellectual, but in the best sense of that term; never dry, didactic or conceited. His portrait of RFK is a memorable one.
The book is that rare instance where subject and biographer are perfectly matched. The result is, as it were, worthy of them both.
Or perhaps not. The Kennedys continue to evoke strong passions, pro and con. Their merits, and flaws, remain the subject of debate to this day.
What impressed me most about RFK - perhaps the dominant impression I took away from this biography - was his ability to grow and mature as a person and a man. He was never a static figure, nor one unaware of his own shortcomings. Though born to wealth and privilege, he was able to move beyond this, able to broaden his horizons and deepen his empathy, to the point where he became conversant with the broad spectrum of struggling humanity, able to walk in their shoes and relate to their problems and concerns.
Such a thing could never be said of such contemporary politicians as G. W. Bush or John Kerry - men of wealth and privilege who never seemed able to shed their limitations and, perhaps, never even recognized them as such. RFK stood head and shoulders above such figures - and, indeed, above most politicians, of whatsoever background or party affiliation.
Schlesinger’s biography, it must be said, is far from being an impartial look at Robert Kennedy. Schlesinger knew, respected and admired RFK and makes a case that the reader should share in these feelings. The book sometimes reads like a presentation offered by defense counsel, though always polished and persuasive.
Indeed, Schlesinger’s erudition, the broad expanse of his intellect, his ability to marshal facts and details to buttress some argument, would, were it not so congenial, be more than a little intimidating. The author is a self-professed intellectual, but in the best sense of that term; never dry, didactic or conceited. His portrait of RFK is a memorable one.
The book is that rare instance where subject and biographer are perfectly matched. The result is, as it were, worthy of them both.
January 20, 2016
Great book! Despite being over 900 pages, I did not need a long time to read this. Schlesinger Jr. brings a vivid, personal, yet balanced perspective to RFK. I came away from reading this with the impression that Kennedy was continually evolving personally as well as professionally, yet he did not compromise his characteristic bluntness or what he believed in. Unfortunately, the shadow of JFK always seemed to loom over him - especially following his assassination in 1963. RFK seemed to live with a continual fear of gunshots and being shot himself, yet he did not keep this fear from letting him live his life. Unfortunately, his decision to do that also contributed to him losing him life. Schlesinger Jr. details the torment that went through RFK's mind as he contemplated (too long) the decision to run in 1968.
January 17, 2022
A great book I waited far too long to read, this is the story of RFK writ in epic fashion. Kennedy's early death, when he seemed on the cusp of accomplishing truly great things for his country, makes him a bit of a mystery. Was he the ruthless bully? The coldly loyal lieutenant to a beloved older brother? A visionary who cared deeply about the disadvantaged? Schlesinger shows him to be a bit of all these. More importantly, he shows his good friend to be someone who grew and changed throughout his life. An especially effective passage details how the two men became friends - until that point the historian bought into the "Ruthless Bobby" image. This book could have degenerated into hagiography but Schlesinger instead relies on a scrupulous attention to detail (he quotes freely and effectively from his subject's speeches and writings) to show what a complex, fascinating figure he was. By the end of the book, a fair reader will be enamored of him as well.
As the title indicates, Schlesinger deals not only with a man but events of his lifetime. I found the detailed, behind-the-scenes sections on such issues as Jimmy Hoffa/Teamsters corruption, J. Edgar Hoover/FBI wiretapping, civil rights and Vietnam to be absorbing. His portrait of Lyndon Johnson is quite well done and showed how it would have been impossible for him to avoid a clash with Kennedy. For these reasons the book would be as interesting for people curious about the making of policies dealing with important national issues as for readers of history or biography. The book excels as all three.
Still, the man stands out clearly in the midst of his turbulent times and their issues. To read this book is to ultimately be saddened by the conflict between a long book and a short life. On finishing the book I realized how sad it was that Bob Kennedy did not get longer to establish his vision for America. I am pleased to know so much more about his journey as far as he did go. An excellent, involving biography.
As the title indicates, Schlesinger deals not only with a man but events of his lifetime. I found the detailed, behind-the-scenes sections on such issues as Jimmy Hoffa/Teamsters corruption, J. Edgar Hoover/FBI wiretapping, civil rights and Vietnam to be absorbing. His portrait of Lyndon Johnson is quite well done and showed how it would have been impossible for him to avoid a clash with Kennedy. For these reasons the book would be as interesting for people curious about the making of policies dealing with important national issues as for readers of history or biography. The book excels as all three.
Still, the man stands out clearly in the midst of his turbulent times and their issues. To read this book is to ultimately be saddened by the conflict between a long book and a short life. On finishing the book I realized how sad it was that Bob Kennedy did not get longer to establish his vision for America. I am pleased to know so much more about his journey as far as he did go. An excellent, involving biography.
October 31, 2007
Great portrait of a very complex and I think very important figure in the political and social history of the United States. Not just a simple biography, which would have been interesting enough, but really an insightful foray into the political process in general. Perception vs. Reality, bureaucratic frustrations, and the complexity of 'the system' are just a few of the over-arching issues that are dealt with here that not only illuminate the RFK legacy but can be thoughtfully applied to almost any political situation past of present. With the relationship between Schlesinger and the Kennedy family (very close), one must be wary that the relationship does not taint the message and I think Schlesinger does a very good job in this regard. While the author's closeness to the family has the potential to be a negative Schlesinger manages to turn it into a positive by remaining even handed and capturing some truly riveting accounts of some of the defining moments of the era that would probably be unavailable for an author further removed from the Kennedy's inner circle. Easy to see why this won the National Book Award.
January 20, 2010
Everything I've read about the Kennedy's spoke to their compassion. Ambition and politics always came after caring.
I started reading this book after Arthur Schlesinger died a couple of years ago (I read A Thousand Days in high school and loved it). I really didn't know much about RFK before starting this book. Well he worked for Joe McCarthy, ran his brothers Presidential campaign, Attorney general overseeing an enormous amount of wiretaps on american citizens, deeply and truly cared about poverty, indians, and african americans, helped facilitate one of the first private-public partnerships to revitalize sections of brooklyn, and was a strong early opponent of the vietnam war. This country would have been lucky to have him longer than it did.
Just a great quote from near the end of the book: "The real stake in the American political process involves not the fate of speechwriters and fund-raisers but the lives of millions of people seeking hope out of despair."
I started reading this book after Arthur Schlesinger died a couple of years ago (I read A Thousand Days in high school and loved it). I really didn't know much about RFK before starting this book. Well he worked for Joe McCarthy, ran his brothers Presidential campaign, Attorney general overseeing an enormous amount of wiretaps on american citizens, deeply and truly cared about poverty, indians, and african americans, helped facilitate one of the first private-public partnerships to revitalize sections of brooklyn, and was a strong early opponent of the vietnam war. This country would have been lucky to have him longer than it did.
Just a great quote from near the end of the book: "The real stake in the American political process involves not the fate of speechwriters and fund-raisers but the lives of millions of people seeking hope out of despair."
September 20, 2024
To state the obvious first: this is an absolute monster of a book. I spent literally half a year reading it, and now that I’m done I have to say it was time well spent. Arthur Schlesinger presents an obsessively detailed biography of Bobby Kennedy, but despite its length and its attention to detail about topics that might seem rather dry on paper, I was never bored reading this book. And now obviously the fact that Bobby Kennedy is one of my favourite historical figures of all time contributes to that, but Schlesinger is also a clever and funny writer.
One thing to be aware of going into this as a work of nonfiction is of course that Arthur Schlesinger and Kennedy had a fairly close relationship - professionally and personally - so this is not exactly an unbiased account. Schlesinger is very transparent about this from the very beginning, not only because he sometimes cites from his own diary entries or letters and also brings up some pretty funny commentary and anecdotes involving himself. He also takes care to point out where he personally disagreed with Kennedy, frankly describes the situations in which Kennedy did not come out looking great, and quotes plenty of people who criticized him to make for a fair, well-rounded biography. As he puts it, the last thing Bobby would have wanted is a hagiography, which rings true enough based on the things I already knew about him going in and even more so after finishing this book. And I do think that Schlesinger succeeds in that, though it remains obvious that this is a work of someone who had a lot of love and admiration for Bobby Kennedy the person as well as Bobby Kenney the politician. Which is not criticism coming from me, but definitely something to be aware of.
Schlesinger’s closeness to the Kennedy administration and family also brings the big advantage that he could draw on a lot of primary sources: interviews and direct correspondence with plenty of the people who worked in the White House during the Kennedy and Johnson administrations or from RFK’s time as Attorney General, as senator and from the campaign trail in ‘68 (on Bobby’s but also McCarthy’s team), other political figures of the time like George McGovern, members of the FBI and CIA, newspapermen and activists who encountered Bobby in the sixties, and so on. Perhaps the coolest thing is that Ethel (who is still alive, as I remembered in shock every once in while during my time reading, and also apparently an awful travel companion) allowed him access to Bobby’s personal correspondence. Needless to say this adds a lot to the book.
Sometimes the book also betrays its age. It was published barely ten years after the assassination. The most startling reminder of that for me was the brief, almost callous mention of Rosemary Kennedy, whose entire story in the book is boiled down to “It had become sadly clear that rosemary, falling farther and farther behind, would live more tranquilly with the nuns in a wisconsin convent.” Considering that we now know that she was forced to undergo a lobotomy, this naturally sounds absolutely fucking insane, but that wasn’t public knowledge until years after the book was published, so it’s very possible that Schlesinger simply didn’t know.
Aside from that, Robert Kennedy and His Times is a very comprehensive narrative of, well. Robert Kennedy and his times. You get plenty of factual info about his childhood, his studies and his travels, his relationship with his family (especially his father and his brother Jack), his career first as campaign manager for Jack and later as Attorney General, his time in the senate, and his controversial run for presidency, but the many personal memories from a whole host of people and his personal correspondence also allow an incredibly fascinating look into what Bobby was like as a person.
The main takeaway from this book is that he was incredibly fucking funny. Like full on hilarious. Some of the quotes in this book are just laugh out loud funny. If you only know one thing about Bobby Kennedy, it should be that he made the most godawful jokes of all time, and I have to respect him for that. Getting back to the serious stuff though, Hector Lopez is quoted near the end of this massive biography saying something that to me is not only what first made me interested in Bobby Kennedy but also the essence of this book: “What can you call Bobby? ‘the last of the great liberals?’ He wouldn’t have liked that. I know he wouldn’t. I guess I’d have to say he was ‘the last of the great believables.’” Reading this book, you truly get the sense of Robert Kennedy as a controversial figure, and it becomes understandable why he inspired so much passion - positive and negative - in people at the time, which I think can sometimes be tough when you learn about his political positions (especially as a non-american) because they don’t seem very outlandish or radical for the most part. But it becomes clear just how much he genuinely cared, and in the cynical world of politics that feels like an increasingly rare type of person.
The breadth of material is honestly astonishing, but it does make reading the middle part of the book a tiny bit complicated, simply because so many things are happening at the same time, especially during the JFK presidency while Bobby is Attorney General. Schlesinger approaches this problem by organizing the book by topic instead of following a strict chronology. Looking at it after finishing the book, this is probably the right approach considering that a strictly chronological telling would have meant a LOT of jumping around from Cuba to labour to civil rights to Vietnam to poverty to the mob and the CIA to Latin America and so forth, which probably would have been confusing and also might have caused some background info to fall to the wayside. Unfortunately, this means that it’s a little harder to get a complete picture of what RFK is up to at any given time, since the chapters focusing so intently on one thing does make it feel like HE’S also focusing on this one thing even though you technically know as the reader that he’s also doing a million other things simultaneously. To his credit, Schlesinger is clearly aware of this pitfall and tries his best to mitigate it occasionally (e. g. while writing about the Cuban Missile Crisis he situates it in the context of all the other things he already described in previous chapters that are happening basically simultaneously). Still, it’s something I had to periodically remind myself of while reading.
The ending was also quite abrupt. Now a biography ending with the subject’s death is not entirely surprising or unreasonable, especially since the book was written so shortly after Kennedy’s death, but I do think as a complete biography it would have benefited from at least a short chapter on his influence and/or posthumous reception. It’s totally understandable that Schlesinger doesn’t wade into the circumstances surrounding the assassination itself with all the conspiracy around it but also on a personal level as someone who has not just lost a friend but also a political figure of great importance, but a final chapter would have served to round out the reading experience a little.
Once again I’ve managed to write a massive review for a book I’m rating 5 stars and mostly gone on about the faults I did find within it. WHOOPS. But honestly I was just kind of afraid of getting too deep into my own Bobby Kennedy biography, because if anything this book just made him rise in my estimation. He remains my great real life political figure white whale because like. What IF he had survived. I NEED to know (though as a political hero, one of the great “believables”, I suppose you could say he almost benefits from not having become president, because he never had to deliver on those promises). This is a fascinating book about a super fascinating person. Sure, it’s long and a big time commitment, but there is SO much in here. Funny stuff, infuriating stuff, thought-provoking stuff, and just some cool fun facts. I don’t regret reading it at all. (And PLEASE someone come and talk to me abt Bobby Kennedy. I'm begging. Please do not leave me alone in this insanity)
One thing to be aware of going into this as a work of nonfiction is of course that Arthur Schlesinger and Kennedy had a fairly close relationship - professionally and personally - so this is not exactly an unbiased account. Schlesinger is very transparent about this from the very beginning, not only because he sometimes cites from his own diary entries or letters and also brings up some pretty funny commentary and anecdotes involving himself. He also takes care to point out where he personally disagreed with Kennedy, frankly describes the situations in which Kennedy did not come out looking great, and quotes plenty of people who criticized him to make for a fair, well-rounded biography. As he puts it, the last thing Bobby would have wanted is a hagiography, which rings true enough based on the things I already knew about him going in and even more so after finishing this book. And I do think that Schlesinger succeeds in that, though it remains obvious that this is a work of someone who had a lot of love and admiration for Bobby Kennedy the person as well as Bobby Kenney the politician. Which is not criticism coming from me, but definitely something to be aware of.
Schlesinger’s closeness to the Kennedy administration and family also brings the big advantage that he could draw on a lot of primary sources: interviews and direct correspondence with plenty of the people who worked in the White House during the Kennedy and Johnson administrations or from RFK’s time as Attorney General, as senator and from the campaign trail in ‘68 (on Bobby’s but also McCarthy’s team), other political figures of the time like George McGovern, members of the FBI and CIA, newspapermen and activists who encountered Bobby in the sixties, and so on. Perhaps the coolest thing is that Ethel (who is still alive, as I remembered in shock every once in while during my time reading, and also apparently an awful travel companion) allowed him access to Bobby’s personal correspondence. Needless to say this adds a lot to the book.
Sometimes the book also betrays its age. It was published barely ten years after the assassination. The most startling reminder of that for me was the brief, almost callous mention of Rosemary Kennedy, whose entire story in the book is boiled down to “It had become sadly clear that rosemary, falling farther and farther behind, would live more tranquilly with the nuns in a wisconsin convent.” Considering that we now know that she was forced to undergo a lobotomy, this naturally sounds absolutely fucking insane, but that wasn’t public knowledge until years after the book was published, so it’s very possible that Schlesinger simply didn’t know.
Aside from that, Robert Kennedy and His Times is a very comprehensive narrative of, well. Robert Kennedy and his times. You get plenty of factual info about his childhood, his studies and his travels, his relationship with his family (especially his father and his brother Jack), his career first as campaign manager for Jack and later as Attorney General, his time in the senate, and his controversial run for presidency, but the many personal memories from a whole host of people and his personal correspondence also allow an incredibly fascinating look into what Bobby was like as a person.
The main takeaway from this book is that he was incredibly fucking funny. Like full on hilarious. Some of the quotes in this book are just laugh out loud funny. If you only know one thing about Bobby Kennedy, it should be that he made the most godawful jokes of all time, and I have to respect him for that. Getting back to the serious stuff though, Hector Lopez is quoted near the end of this massive biography saying something that to me is not only what first made me interested in Bobby Kennedy but also the essence of this book: “What can you call Bobby? ‘the last of the great liberals?’ He wouldn’t have liked that. I know he wouldn’t. I guess I’d have to say he was ‘the last of the great believables.’” Reading this book, you truly get the sense of Robert Kennedy as a controversial figure, and it becomes understandable why he inspired so much passion - positive and negative - in people at the time, which I think can sometimes be tough when you learn about his political positions (especially as a non-american) because they don’t seem very outlandish or radical for the most part. But it becomes clear just how much he genuinely cared, and in the cynical world of politics that feels like an increasingly rare type of person.
The breadth of material is honestly astonishing, but it does make reading the middle part of the book a tiny bit complicated, simply because so many things are happening at the same time, especially during the JFK presidency while Bobby is Attorney General. Schlesinger approaches this problem by organizing the book by topic instead of following a strict chronology. Looking at it after finishing the book, this is probably the right approach considering that a strictly chronological telling would have meant a LOT of jumping around from Cuba to labour to civil rights to Vietnam to poverty to the mob and the CIA to Latin America and so forth, which probably would have been confusing and also might have caused some background info to fall to the wayside. Unfortunately, this means that it’s a little harder to get a complete picture of what RFK is up to at any given time, since the chapters focusing so intently on one thing does make it feel like HE’S also focusing on this one thing even though you technically know as the reader that he’s also doing a million other things simultaneously. To his credit, Schlesinger is clearly aware of this pitfall and tries his best to mitigate it occasionally (e. g. while writing about the Cuban Missile Crisis he situates it in the context of all the other things he already described in previous chapters that are happening basically simultaneously). Still, it’s something I had to periodically remind myself of while reading.
The ending was also quite abrupt. Now a biography ending with the subject’s death is not entirely surprising or unreasonable, especially since the book was written so shortly after Kennedy’s death, but I do think as a complete biography it would have benefited from at least a short chapter on his influence and/or posthumous reception. It’s totally understandable that Schlesinger doesn’t wade into the circumstances surrounding the assassination itself with all the conspiracy around it but also on a personal level as someone who has not just lost a friend but also a political figure of great importance, but a final chapter would have served to round out the reading experience a little.
Once again I’ve managed to write a massive review for a book I’m rating 5 stars and mostly gone on about the faults I did find within it. WHOOPS. But honestly I was just kind of afraid of getting too deep into my own Bobby Kennedy biography, because if anything this book just made him rise in my estimation. He remains my great real life political figure white whale because like. What IF he had survived. I NEED to know (though as a political hero, one of the great “believables”, I suppose you could say he almost benefits from not having become president, because he never had to deliver on those promises). This is a fascinating book about a super fascinating person. Sure, it’s long and a big time commitment, but there is SO much in here. Funny stuff, infuriating stuff, thought-provoking stuff, and just some cool fun facts. I don’t regret reading it at all. (And PLEASE someone come and talk to me abt Bobby Kennedy. I'm begging. Please do not leave me alone in this insanity)
April 9, 2019
Still the definitive RFK biography; I think any criticism that this is hagiography is unwarranted. While Schlesinger was not an unbiased observer (which always begs the question if such a thing is even possible), he was extremely fair in portraying the criticisms that arose in response to RFK. His own critiques were often more mild, and information revealed decades after this was published was obviously not included, yet it is tremendously informative and insightful and no other single book to date is as comprehensive.
January 18, 2018
Liked this slightly better than Schlesinger’s “A Thousand Days” about JFK. Definitely a different style than Evan Thomas’s RFK bio, but good nonetheless. The chapters regarding Vietnam were particularly poignant. We’ll never know exactly what difference Bobby Kennedy would have made on the war had he lived beyond 1968. However, we can remember his passion for justice and his caring for society’s underdogs. He was a unique statesman who demonstrated courage when the U.S. needed leaders willing to engage in new ways to solve old problems. (1968 was 50 years ago now and reading this book causes one to wonder just what we have learned exactly in those decades since Vietnam, the Great Society, racial injustice, and intergenerational poverty.)
June 8, 2016
Although Schlesinger is hardly an unbiased biographer, this roughly 1100 page view into Robert Kennedy's life is not at all shy about quoting all of Bobby's critics fairly and frequently. I've read far more protective books, and Schlesinger clearly understands that his subject doesn't require it. While most of the well-known subjects regarding Bobby's role in the Kennedy administration are all touched upon, including his clash with Hoover and the FBI as AG, I found his role as chief counsel for the Senate Rackets Committee as well as his work in the Civil Rights movement the most revealing. He was certainly a tremendous political force in a very turbulent time.
Currently reading
March 15, 2012Great quote in this biog about RFK: "he never told a lie; he never misquoted anybody; he never concealed . . . he spoke with great directness softened by humor," said Michael Forrestal. And 685 pages in, I find that to be a great summary of what most others have been quoted as saying--except for Jimmy Hoffa and J. Edgar Hoover of course.
January 17, 2013
A complete telling of RFK's life. I would have given it 5 stars, but the assassination isn't mentioned at all. The book opens with the funeral and closes with him entering the kitchen at the Ambassador Hotel on 6/5/1968. If someone had no idea how RFK died, they would finish the book wondering what happened.
April 4, 2020
Really interesting, filling in gaps in my knowledge and letting me see how the whole Kennedys thing is more than just JFK. It does almost portray Bobby Kennedy as a latter day saint though and our daughter who also read the book for her Modern History course keeps reminding me that Schlesinger was a family friend of the Kennedys.
October 24, 2025
What a read. An absolute tome of a work - this is my first time reading Schlesinger. Enjoyed it thoroughly. I’m definitely keen on reading his other historical works. His language is rhythmic - he possesses an obvious talent with the pen. It helps of course that his subject matter was his good friend and perhaps the most interesting political personality of the 20th century.
What more can you say about Bobby? His was a well-lived life cut short. His compassion, intelligence and toughness throughout his public life is evident in this book. He is a personal hero of mine and probably the best of the would-be Presidents of the United States.
What more can you say about Bobby? His was a well-lived life cut short. His compassion, intelligence and toughness throughout his public life is evident in this book. He is a personal hero of mine and probably the best of the would-be Presidents of the United States.
July 17, 2013
Schlesinger described his relationship to Robert Kennedy as that of a great admirer and devoted friend, going on to say "if it is necessary for a biographer of Robert Kennedy to regard him as evil, then I am not qualified to be his biographer." This biography was definately written with love and respect, while still making a valient effort to tell the complete story. I deeply enjoyed Schlesinger's writing style, and left this brick of a book with a deeper understanding of the man that was Bobby Kennedy. I have always thought our world might be different had he lived, but just how different he had the potential to make America makes his early death even more tragic.
May 29, 2008
I remember the day he was shot. Coming only two months after Martin Luther King's assasination it seemed like we were on the verge of revolution.
What is clear from this biography is Robert Kennedy's growth as a man and as a human being. He found his own voice and it was tragically silenced.
Like the author, I often wondered what might have been....he was an inspiring figure, flawed, but passionate about what he believed in.
I think this work is very well written, researched and a little biased but still stands on its own merits.
What is clear from this biography is Robert Kennedy's growth as a man and as a human being. He found his own voice and it was tragically silenced.
Like the author, I often wondered what might have been....he was an inspiring figure, flawed, but passionate about what he believed in.
I think this work is very well written, researched and a little biased but still stands on its own merits.
April 8, 2008
Long and sometimes dry, this book devotes too much time discussing certain policies of the Kennedy administration that have had little impact on history (e.g., Kennedy's foreign policy in South America). On the other hand, Schlesinger devotes only two or three pages to RFK's assassination. In short, I believe there are probably better bios of RFK.
July 26, 2018
It takes a special kind of person (with an excellent biographer I might add) to make one mourn their death 50 years after the fact and 24 years before you were even born, and yet.
A gripping read despite the length, an excellent insight into the life of perhaps the greatest president the US never had
A gripping read despite the length, an excellent insight into the life of perhaps the greatest president the US never had
December 19, 2010
One of my favorite biographies, and if it's a bit sentimental on what-could-have been, it's understandable. This is a story of the growth of a very complex human being who had the courage and will to change.
July 16, 2012
Only read a number of chapters for an essay I did on his life, but Schlesinger knew the man, and he writes well. I love the description of the emotion Kennedy shows when he visits the homeless and destitute. Inspiring.
Read
June 4, 2023I write this review having finished this book two days before the 55th anniversary of Robert Kennedy's untimely death. His son, who shares his name, is running for office, the act that left RFK, Jr. the mantle of his slain father.
Schlesinger's weighty biography provides as an exceptional dive into Robert Kennedy's life, his motivations, his psyche. What Schlesinger reveals in Robert and the likewise tragically short life of President Kennedy is a confirmation of words written by Solomon eons before: "there is nothing new under the sun."
The work does a great job highlighting the tasks of which the Kennedy administration had to undertake, tasks with which feel utterly incomplete in some regards 50 years later.
I desired to read this book because of the appreciation I have for President Kennedy, and the question that always floated in my mind: How is it that Robert Kennedy, the young and seemingly inexperienced younger brother of the president, could be appointed as Attorney General?
This book provides a clear answer for why, not ignoring that many had this same question when Robert was appointed. His values for justice and a hardline stance against the mafia in the 1950s led Kennedy to the top of the criminal justice system. Along the way, Schlesinger speaks of the troubles of a "rogue" FBI, poverty, and racial inequality.
One can see why Robert Kennedy, Jr., who at this time is a clear underdog, has some support in the polls. Though not entirely like his father, perhaps one longs for a sense of completion of the fight RFK fought.
And fought RFK did. Schlesinger depicts a man, born of a wealthy family, using personal tragedy to relate to the outcasts of 1960s America. His fight for justice, even if not perfect, leaves one wondering what could have been.
All in all, this wondering comes from a greater understanding that Robert Kennedy was a rarity in politics: despite the accusations, despite the missteps, he was an honest man, and a good one.
I find myself knowing a little bit more about the 1960s after reading this book, undoubtedly due to the weight Robert Kennedy had on this time. This was helped in part by Schlesinger's role as a strong advisor to all three of the Kennedy brothers.
By and large, the author does a swell job in remaining humble in this role, and I never feel as if any depictions were incomplete of the situations he gave. He often would provide many differing views in footnotes which I found helpful.
However, at times this closeness hurt the work. Schlesinger's familiarity with the situation to me left me feeling as if he would think the reader would remember every name, every position mentioned prior. For those who lived the time, it's possible this could be the case.
Furthermore, it's clear Schlesinger is a strong advocate for Robert Kennedy. At times this left his writing of the situations seemingly dismissive of what opponents had to say. Those with opposing views to the author on what to do during the Cold War for instance, who were depicted as foolish and dangerous at times in the book, seem rather vindicated by the end of the 1980s.
Despite this, I found the book to be very riveting and a wonderful volume into the chaotic period of the 1960s. Readers would do well to consider this time and what was said then, and consider what is said now.
This step into the 1960s took me 6 months to read, thanks in part to a sporadic reading schedule brought on by the business of a graduate program. While I am satisfied in having read the book, and I will miss reading of a man, so tragically tormented by the Kennedy name, humbly and courageously sacrificing himself in the service of love and country.
Where these times will go, I do not know. Whether RFK, Jr. will get anywhere with the name given to him, I also do not know. I do think that these times are much like the chaos of the 1960s, of which there is a need for a solution. "There is nothing new under the sun." The man who is said to have written that quote, some thousands of years ago, in wealth greater than ever, understood the solution to life's ills in the end. Robert Francis Kennedy, in all of his tragedy, doubt, and anguish, understood it too. May the reader of Robert Kennedy in His Life and Times find the same understanding.
Schlesinger's weighty biography provides as an exceptional dive into Robert Kennedy's life, his motivations, his psyche. What Schlesinger reveals in Robert and the likewise tragically short life of President Kennedy is a confirmation of words written by Solomon eons before: "there is nothing new under the sun."
The work does a great job highlighting the tasks of which the Kennedy administration had to undertake, tasks with which feel utterly incomplete in some regards 50 years later.
I desired to read this book because of the appreciation I have for President Kennedy, and the question that always floated in my mind: How is it that Robert Kennedy, the young and seemingly inexperienced younger brother of the president, could be appointed as Attorney General?
This book provides a clear answer for why, not ignoring that many had this same question when Robert was appointed. His values for justice and a hardline stance against the mafia in the 1950s led Kennedy to the top of the criminal justice system. Along the way, Schlesinger speaks of the troubles of a "rogue" FBI, poverty, and racial inequality.
One can see why Robert Kennedy, Jr., who at this time is a clear underdog, has some support in the polls. Though not entirely like his father, perhaps one longs for a sense of completion of the fight RFK fought.
And fought RFK did. Schlesinger depicts a man, born of a wealthy family, using personal tragedy to relate to the outcasts of 1960s America. His fight for justice, even if not perfect, leaves one wondering what could have been.
All in all, this wondering comes from a greater understanding that Robert Kennedy was a rarity in politics: despite the accusations, despite the missteps, he was an honest man, and a good one.
I find myself knowing a little bit more about the 1960s after reading this book, undoubtedly due to the weight Robert Kennedy had on this time. This was helped in part by Schlesinger's role as a strong advisor to all three of the Kennedy brothers.
By and large, the author does a swell job in remaining humble in this role, and I never feel as if any depictions were incomplete of the situations he gave. He often would provide many differing views in footnotes which I found helpful.
However, at times this closeness hurt the work. Schlesinger's familiarity with the situation to me left me feeling as if he would think the reader would remember every name, every position mentioned prior. For those who lived the time, it's possible this could be the case.
Furthermore, it's clear Schlesinger is a strong advocate for Robert Kennedy. At times this left his writing of the situations seemingly dismissive of what opponents had to say. Those with opposing views to the author on what to do during the Cold War for instance, who were depicted as foolish and dangerous at times in the book, seem rather vindicated by the end of the 1980s.
Despite this, I found the book to be very riveting and a wonderful volume into the chaotic period of the 1960s. Readers would do well to consider this time and what was said then, and consider what is said now.
This step into the 1960s took me 6 months to read, thanks in part to a sporadic reading schedule brought on by the business of a graduate program. While I am satisfied in having read the book, and I will miss reading of a man, so tragically tormented by the Kennedy name, humbly and courageously sacrificing himself in the service of love and country.
Where these times will go, I do not know. Whether RFK, Jr. will get anywhere with the name given to him, I also do not know. I do think that these times are much like the chaos of the 1960s, of which there is a need for a solution. "There is nothing new under the sun." The man who is said to have written that quote, some thousands of years ago, in wealth greater than ever, understood the solution to life's ills in the end. Robert Francis Kennedy, in all of his tragedy, doubt, and anguish, understood it too. May the reader of Robert Kennedy in His Life and Times find the same understanding.
October 15, 2025
"What can you call Bobby? 'the last of the great liberals'? he wouldn't have liked that. I knew he wouldn't. I guess I'd have to say he was 'the last of the great beliavbles.'
"As I look back on the sixties, he was the man who actually could have changed the course of American history."
An absolutely incredible novel about the life of Robert Kennedy. From his beginnings as the unappreciated Joesph Kennedy son, to his struggles through school, to his entrance into the political world via working Joe McCarthy and his battles against corrupt labor unions lead by Jimmy Hoffa, to his experiences participating in electoral campaigns of both Adlai Stevenson and his brother's senator and presidnetal campaign, to his apprehension and eventual acceptance of becoming his brother's Attorney General, to his role in civil rights, the Cuban Missle Crisis, and to his grief around his brother's assassination on 11/22/63, to his complicated and often hostile relationship to LBJ which contributed to LBJ not seeking a 2nd term, and to the tense and emotional roller coaster of his decision to campaign for US president before his assassination in 1968. This biography truly gives insight into one of the most important figures of the 1960s, and to potentially the greatest president we never had. A true-life story that seems to have such momentum and yet looming sense of doom leading up to its unexpected end, you close the final pages wondering only "what if?"
"A revolution is coming—a revolution which will be peaceful if we are wise enough; compassionate if we care enough; successful if we are fortunate enough—But a revolution which is coming whether we will it or not. We can affect its character; we cannot alter its inevitability." - RFK 1966
"As I look back on the sixties, he was the man who actually could have changed the course of American history."
An absolutely incredible novel about the life of Robert Kennedy. From his beginnings as the unappreciated Joesph Kennedy son, to his struggles through school, to his entrance into the political world via working Joe McCarthy and his battles against corrupt labor unions lead by Jimmy Hoffa, to his experiences participating in electoral campaigns of both Adlai Stevenson and his brother's senator and presidnetal campaign, to his apprehension and eventual acceptance of becoming his brother's Attorney General, to his role in civil rights, the Cuban Missle Crisis, and to his grief around his brother's assassination on 11/22/63, to his complicated and often hostile relationship to LBJ which contributed to LBJ not seeking a 2nd term, and to the tense and emotional roller coaster of his decision to campaign for US president before his assassination in 1968. This biography truly gives insight into one of the most important figures of the 1960s, and to potentially the greatest president we never had. A true-life story that seems to have such momentum and yet looming sense of doom leading up to its unexpected end, you close the final pages wondering only "what if?"
"A revolution is coming—a revolution which will be peaceful if we are wise enough; compassionate if we care enough; successful if we are fortunate enough—But a revolution which is coming whether we will it or not. We can affect its character; we cannot alter its inevitability." - RFK 1966
September 7, 2020
This book took me a long time (with a few stops and starts) to finish. It’s extremely detailed and has a personal telling because of the author’s friendship with Kennedy. However, I found that at times it would go into minute details on certain things and gloss over others without a good explanation. Either way, it’s a must-read for people who are interested in Bobby’s life.
November 14, 2025
Is it too much to say that Robert Kennedy has changed my life? No, in fact even that might not say enough. Of course, he would argue otherwise. I can’t look at the world anymore without hearing and hoping…
“To tame the savageness of man and make gentle the life of the world.”
Bobby pray for us.
“To tame the savageness of man and make gentle the life of the world.”
Bobby pray for us.
September 16, 2024
DNF’d at 31%. Too small of print in this edition. I know Schlesinger was a great friend of the Kennedy brothers and worked for them; perhaps he was just TOO detailed in his writing, but/c it was a slog to get as far as I did.
Deep sigh. I admired Bobby Kennedy and was eager to read this biography. It was just too dense and too long.
Deep sigh. I admired Bobby Kennedy and was eager to read this biography. It was just too dense and too long.
May 31, 2016
JFK. What might have been if he became President...
"What would have happened had he not been killed? He would certainly have had a rocky road to the nomination. The power of the Johnson administration and much of the party establishment was behind Humphrey. Still, the dynamism was behind Kennedy, and he might well have swept the convention. If nominated, he would most probably have beaten the Republican candidate, Richard M. Nixon.
Individuals do make a difference to history. A Robert Kennedy presidency would have brought a quick end to American involvement in the Vietnam War. Those thousands of Americans—and many thousands more Vietnamese and Cambodians—who were killed from 1969 to 1973 would have been at home with their families. A Robert Kennedy presidency would have consolidated and extended the achievements of John Kennedy’s New Frontier and Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society. The liberal tide of the 1960s was still running strong enough in 1969 to affect Nixon’s domestic policies. The Environmental Protection Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act with its CETA employment program were all enacted under Nixon. If that still fast-flowing tide so influenced a conservative administration, what signal opportunities it would have given a reform president!
The confidence that both black and white working-class Americans had in Robert Kennedy would have created the possibility of progress toward racial reconciliation. His appeal to the young might have mitigated some of the under-thirty excesses of the time. And of course the election of Robert Kennedy would have delivered the republic from Watergate, with its attendant subversion of the Constitution and destruction of faith in government."
"What would have happened had he not been killed? He would certainly have had a rocky road to the nomination. The power of the Johnson administration and much of the party establishment was behind Humphrey. Still, the dynamism was behind Kennedy, and he might well have swept the convention. If nominated, he would most probably have beaten the Republican candidate, Richard M. Nixon.
Individuals do make a difference to history. A Robert Kennedy presidency would have brought a quick end to American involvement in the Vietnam War. Those thousands of Americans—and many thousands more Vietnamese and Cambodians—who were killed from 1969 to 1973 would have been at home with their families. A Robert Kennedy presidency would have consolidated and extended the achievements of John Kennedy’s New Frontier and Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society. The liberal tide of the 1960s was still running strong enough in 1969 to affect Nixon’s domestic policies. The Environmental Protection Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act with its CETA employment program were all enacted under Nixon. If that still fast-flowing tide so influenced a conservative administration, what signal opportunities it would have given a reform president!
The confidence that both black and white working-class Americans had in Robert Kennedy would have created the possibility of progress toward racial reconciliation. His appeal to the young might have mitigated some of the under-thirty excesses of the time. And of course the election of Robert Kennedy would have delivered the republic from Watergate, with its attendant subversion of the Constitution and destruction of faith in government."
August 3, 2011
Quite simply one of the best biographies I have ever read. A gripping account of the turbulent life and times of one of America's great politicians. As a close friend and Kennedy insider, Schlesinger's book gives a keen insight into RFK's complex personality. The Good Bobby/Bad Bobby phenomenon is explored. For some RFK will always remain 'ruthless', the red-baiting Senate investigator who worked for Joe McCarthy, during the early ’50s and who followed that up by becoming JFK's tough-guy campaign manager treating all opponents as mortal enemies. More still remember him as the grief-stricken brother who felt compelled to carry on JFK's legacy, an energetic and passionate Senator who never shied away from uncomfortable issues such as civil rights and poverty, an orator whose moving speech following the assassination of Martin Luther King has been recognised as one of the greatest speeches in American history, and who in his final incarnation had become an existentialist who campaigned while carrying, in his pocket, a book by Albert Camus. RFK will always remain something of an enigma, charismatic, complex and seemingly constantly evolving, over forty years after his death he still has the power to fascinate and while we may never know if RFK would have fulfilled his promise, Schlesinger's book is likely to remain the most detailed and definitive account of his life.
August 12, 2018
A huge volume, both in size and content. Having read Schlesinger's book on JFK's time in the White House, 'A Thousand Days', for which he received the Pulitzer prize for biography, I consider 'Robert Kennedy and His Times' the superior publication.
Purchased from a book shop in Hey on Wye for the laughable price of £3, this has to be one of the best value for money literary works in my collection.
Although Schlesinger was a dedicated Kennedy man, first with JFK and after with Bobby, I thought his treatment of RFK's biography was balanced, erudite and fair. The author has accompanied the manuscript with Notes as well as many footnotes on most pages. He utilised the Kennedy library and Oral History collections, interviews, media publications, private papers etc.
Though I was a witness to these times, albeit from across the Atlantic, I found so much in this work to illuminate my distant memory and create fresh perspectives.
An altogether indispensable historical tome, not just of the Kennedy's but of 50's & 60's America.
"The danger that in seeking universal peace, needlessly fearful of change and disorder, we will in fact embroil ourselves and the world in a whole series of Vietnams." (RFK April 24 1968.)
Purchased from a book shop in Hey on Wye for the laughable price of £3, this has to be one of the best value for money literary works in my collection.
Although Schlesinger was a dedicated Kennedy man, first with JFK and after with Bobby, I thought his treatment of RFK's biography was balanced, erudite and fair. The author has accompanied the manuscript with Notes as well as many footnotes on most pages. He utilised the Kennedy library and Oral History collections, interviews, media publications, private papers etc.
Though I was a witness to these times, albeit from across the Atlantic, I found so much in this work to illuminate my distant memory and create fresh perspectives.
An altogether indispensable historical tome, not just of the Kennedy's but of 50's & 60's America.
"The danger that in seeking universal peace, needlessly fearful of change and disorder, we will in fact embroil ourselves and the world in a whole series of Vietnams." (RFK April 24 1968.)
December 20, 2018
916 pages before notes, acknowledgements, citations, etc. -- a big 3 week project! This was my first read of Schlesinger (political prize winning Kennedy aid/New Dealer/New Frontiersman w books on FDR, Jackson, among others) and I came away fairly impressed. The first 1/4 or so covered Joe Kennedy Sr. in tremendous detail, at the cost of a relatively brief coverage of RFK's early childhood, adolescence, and more formative years. The book barely grazes RFK's familial relationships (outside of JFK-RFK), marriage, and children. Some of the most engaging parts examined the dynamics of RFK v. J. Edgar Hoover in the Justice Dept. and RFK's role as chief advisor during the Cuban Missile Crisis. I also wish Schlesinger had covered RFK's 1968 presidential candidacy in more extensive detail; the end of the bio felt hurried. Overall, I would definitely recommend this National Book Award winner to any fan of 20th century American history and look forward to reading another Schlesinger bio down the road.
July 31, 2011
This book has been in my personal library since I bought and first read it in late 1979. While I found it captivating then, the recent election of Barack Obama as President lent it a whole new meaning. This reading left me wondering if things were worse then or now. In the sixties they were dealing with the Vietnam War and battles against overt, hateful racism which threatened to split the nation again. Perhaps the flagrant racism is now gone, but Obama now comes to power at a time when strident character-assassination politics has ruled for nearly thirty years, the entire economy threatens to implode, and the U.S. is hated or feared worldwide. While we will never know what type of president Robert Kennedy would have been, his style during his last campaign is similar to what I believe people are inspired by in Barack Obama.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 97 reviews