Is this still my Batman?
Geoff Johns hotly anticipated Batman: Earth One is a familiar tale... barely. Don't get me wrong; you've got the right notes being hit (Bruce's parents being murdered, his desire to wage a war on crime, Alfred’s unwavering dedication to Bruce) but it’s the key that’s different. This Batman origin tale is not unlike finding yourself in a place you’ve visited before, long ago. And instead of finding it as you left it, the world has changed into something disturbingly familiar. Disturbing because you can still remember how it used to be since, strangely, that’s not what it is anymore.
Johns creates a new Gotham that seems, somehow, even more corrupt and morally bankrupt than the one we all know. The corners seem darker, the shadows more threatening, the atmosphere oppressively dismal. This a Gotham without hope. A Gotham whose Mayor Cobblepot parades escorts around. A Gotham with no hope and no help. And at the centre, instead of a boy making a vow to protect the city, you have a young Bruce Wayne who wants only one thing--revenge. And somehow, in that small adjustment, Johns makes Bruce human. Ironically, it occurs to me that this perspective has never really been explored before. I think we’re all very used to Bruce the superhuman, who’s travelled the world over, transforming himself into the perfect weapon for his war on crime. We don’t have that here. Instead, we’re given Bruce the furious survivor, somewhat trained, unpolished and determined to have his revenge. It produces a refreshingly frustrating read; I kept expecting Bruce to make that epic decision to be a force for good in a dark time--but that never really happens. And I'm actually glad it doesn't. Why? Because that’s something new. But that novelty isn’t exclusive to Bruce Wayne.
Where Johns shines is in the recreation of a supporting cast. Rather than make Batman: Earth One a journey of transformation for Bruce alone, Johns allows us all to see the pivotal moments for several characters at once. Alfred becomes Bruce’s butler and confidant out of duty (rather than love) only to develop genuine affection for the boy. Gordon becomes the cop who can’t be bought only after having been under the thumb of a criminal. Harvey Bullock becomes the hard-nosed, seen-it-all detective by coming through horror. Johns peels back the layers of these essential characters and gives them origin stories of their own.
I won’t go into the plot. I think the changes that Johns offers are worth exploring and therefore worth experiencing first hand. As I suggested before, the familiar notes are there, it’s the world around the tragedy that has drastically changed.
So why 3 stars instead of 5? Because while there is much to celebrate in this graphic novel, there's also a lot to be desired and even more to frustrate.
The most prevalent problem was the clear fact that this graphic novel was not written to be self-contained. Unlike J. Michael Straczynski’s spectacular Superman: Earth One, Johns’ Batman: Earth One was very obviously written with a sequel (or sequels) in mind. And what’s wrong with that? Honestly, in terms of a series of books, very little. But when you consider that this supposedly self-contained story is, in fact, not self-contained, you’ve alienated the reader. The problem is that the finger-posting is blatant and somewhat awkward. It’s important to prepare for future events but that preparation must be subtle in order to be effective. The manner in which it occurs here assumes that the reader needs their hands held. Moreover, it robs the audience of that “I knew it!” moment that we all find so satisfying. Further, finger-posting should not be at the cost of the plot you have in hand. Ultimately, the story often reads like a preface to a text that that doesn’t yet exist and so the text feels like it’s reaching for branches that aren’t there.
Still, textual interdependence isn’t always a bad thing.
The text constantly gestures towards many classic Batman moments. This intertextuality was initially troublesome but upon reflection, I thought it was interesting. The memorable scenes were not simply copied into the new text but revised, creating a new history. These moments are ultimately intensely satisfying, acknowledging the extant lore while ensuring that Batman: Earth One remains distinct.
My feelings about Batman: Earth One are deeply conflicted but, truthfully, that’s enough of a reason to suggest taking a chance on the text. It’s problematic yet somehow undeniably interesting--likely because it’s problematic. Geoff Johns’ Batman: Earth One isn’t a simple retelling of Batman’s first steps--it’s a revision of some of the core elements that came to shape Gotham’s Dark Knight. But with that revision comes the realization that we have a new Batman with new motivations and different skills. And with that realization, I believe, comes the essential curiosity that led Johns to approach the text in this way, resulting in these questions: who is this Batman? What is he capable of? And, most obviously, what happens next?