In Darjeeling Distinction, Sarah Besky presents a rich ethnographic account of what 'justice' means for Darjeeling tea plantations in northeastern India. She carefully unpacks how various projects have sought to romanticize the postcolonial capitalist plantation as a venue for ethical consumption in the twenty-first century. Throughout the book, her writing vividly conjures up the complex scenes she is describing, without leaning on exoticism, cynicism or a soapbox.
Besky investigates how three projects have promised to bring justice to Darjeeling plantations: a) fair trade; b) Geographical Indication, or terroir; and c) the Gorkhaland separatist movement. These three projects all see Darjeeling through the filter of a "Third World agrarian imaginary." Here, she is building on Julie Guthman's book Agrarian Dreams, which explores the agrarian imaginary in U.S. organic agriculture. Fair trade, terroir and Gorkhaland all vow to redeem the Darjeeling plantation by restoring it to an imaginary, nostalgic past.
Ultimately, Besky argues that none of these three strategies to re-brand the plantation align with workers' own ideas of justice. She contends that if fair trade institutions wish to generate positive change in most tea plantation workers' lives, they need to be frank about what a plantation is, its uncomfortable history, and what justice means to workers.
Her main theoretical argument is that workers understand justice on the the Darjeeling plantation based on a "tripartite moral economy." This involves reciprocal relationships between planters, labourers, and non-humans (tea bushes and the landscape at large). For example, planters are expected to ensure workers' houses are properly maintained, and workers see themselves as responsible for caring for the tea bushes. As Besky acknowledges (p. 179), the idea of the moral economy doesn't sit well with those who like to imagine workers as inherently revolutionary. But as she puts it:
"Tea workers are stuck with tea bushes, colonialism, and paternalism . . . The concept of a tripartite moral economy takes workers' senses of care seriously and puts them in a historical frame. It permits us to think with, rather than against, the colonial and postcolonial forms that make up the tea plantation landscape. Thinking with and about the plantation moral economy, then, helps us diagnose what is not only meaningful to workers but also what their work means." (p. 85).
Although the book is geared toward academic audiences, it's accessible for non-academics interested in tea, a carefully-researched history of northeastern India and Nepal, and a critical analysis of ethical consumption.