I found Inefficient Markets to be a fascinating and clear introduction to behavioural finance, and a strong challenge to the assumptions of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). While I'll confess the dense and heavy math / formulae did my head in at times, Shleifer does a great job of showing how real-life investor behaviour—driven by sentiment, bias, and limits to arbitrage—can lead to persistent anomalies in markets that EMH can't explain away.
One of the most interesting sections for me was the discussion of closed-end funds. Shleifer explores how these funds often trade at prices that deviate from their net asset value (NAV), largely due to irrational investor sentiment and arbitrage limitations. I hadn’t appreciated how much this inefficiency contributed to the rise of open-end funds, which avoid the issue by allowing investors to redeem shares at NAV—such a good example of how behavioural insights lead to practical financial innovation.
I appreciated how clearly Shleifer laid out both theory and real-world implications. A very worthwhile read that adds depth to how we think about markets, especially when they don’t behave as they’re "supposed" to.