Laden with "historical digression only to try to explain to you the strange strangeness" (11) of the setting, this text assumes a future in which rightwing doctrines come to dominate most polities and cause the standard result of those policy preferences, such as we see in the 2023 war between Hamas and Likud, wherein the former is something of the latter's Frankenstein creature, a dialectical offspring with oedipal intention. The pages here are thus full of local authoritarianisms, warmongering theocracies, restored aristocrats, myopic narco-states, and other deplorables.
There's little narrative overlap between the 50 sections, some obliquely referring to each other; what happens is decidedly less important than what happened, an examination of the causality of the present moment, which is a valuable exercise. The various sections do give a decent tour of the world, which features high tech developments such as micro- and macro- versions of regular species, anthropomorphic animals, living or self-generating consumer goods, robots, holograms, clone soldiers, and so on--all aside horrific poverty and dereliction, the normal conjunction in late capitalism. There's thus lots of science fiction content but it's all marginal, with little explanation. The impression is as described in Herf's Reactionary Modernism, the wedding of misanthropic rightwing ideas, normally against progress in the learned arts and useful sciences, with a fetish for belligerent technologies. One set of characters, for instance, regards how "the Great Wall of Russia was never completed" as "an entirely utopian idea" (195). In some ways, the world's retrogression means the end of certain abstractions, such as commodity fetishism, say, in the proclamation that "Mass production is living out its final years. There aren't two identical nails beaten into humanity's head. Man regained a sense of the thing" (214). Capitalism has thus not been subject to a revolutionary reconstitution of society, but has gone along the other disjunct of that famous line, into the mutual ruin of the contending classes. That "Earth has been given to us as an island of overcoming" (id.) only reinforces the anti-modern nietzschean overtones.
It's overall a thought experiment in geopolitical pessimism, lyotardian in its insistence that the metanarratives of modernity have failed, returning the world in its vacuum to the metanarratives of the ancient world. The central conceit that Islam has taken over Europe is just paranoid and asinine, a houellebecqian jaundice that assumes an unrealistic plausibility and a childish horror. That said, even if it imagines the end of capitalism as a conclusory allegation, the setting can't conceive what that might be at the evidentiary level, except as a sort of apocalypse. It thus joins the cliche genre of disaster fiction, wherein it's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of the current economic regime, as per Mark Fisher, a fairly convincing example of how false consciousness adheres to speculative fiction.
The one constant is the setting's narcotic of choice, tellurium, which is a real element on the periodic table with a known toxicity. Apparently we haven't tried it correctly, which involves nailing a spike of it directly into the brain at a precise locale. The novel does not disclose the exact spot or method of determining where, so devoted fans will need to experiment. The drug seems to grant the ability to speak with the dead and travel through time, among other more standard effects such as euphoria, suspended animation, and so on.
Whatever this text is saying about the world market for narcotics, however, it also draws a metaphorical concordance that "the sad paradox lies in the fact that these barbarians didn't have to beat anything metallic [i.e,., tellurium] into their heads in order to become heroic, for their heads had been beaten with heroic ideas since they were children" (153-54), which combines the basic marxist insight that certain ideas act like narcotics with the horatian principle that dulce et decorum est pro patria mori. Reinforcing the concordance, the text notes that the practice began as a religious rite, with Zoroastrians in the 4th century BCE (185). The aporetic nature of the narcotic discourse contends that "Happiness is not medicine. Not narcotics. Happiness is a condition of the soul. And that is what tellurium offers" (213). Tellurium by contrast "awakens the brain's inmost desires" (311), as though desire were both purely internal and purely good: "Tellurium gifts you with an entire world. A solid and plausible world, a living world. And I ended up in the world that I'd been dreaming of since my early childhood. I became one of the disciples of Our Lord Jesus Christ (311-12).
One of the more effective components of the text is the thread that goes through the several sections (see e.g., sections 21 and 28) dealing specifically with 'carpenters,' those professionals who nail tellurium spikes into brains. We see that they have "professionals ethics" (208), which makes this thread an neat examination of Agamben's eidos zoe, disclosing therein the central significance of this setting. Jesus is not expressly proclaimed to have been the original carpenter but we get the point.
Recommended for those seeking artifacts of the great unfinishment, readers who find responsibility to be the greatest of pleasures, and miserable platonists masturbating to shadows in the cave.