People tend to read biographies for lots of different reasons. Luckily, with Nelson you have dozens of books to choose from, each catering to a different audience, and persuing a different narrative.
This particular biography sets out to mainly do three things:
- disentangle Nelson the man from Nelson the myth.
- focus on Nelson's achievements as a tactician and his personal leading style.
- examine the role Nelson has played and still plays in constituting a sense of British nationality.
As such the biography focuses on Nelson's military career, especially the later years, since about two thirds of the book are devoted the years between the Nile campaign and Trafalgar. Even though the book set out to explore Nelson as a person, his relationships to friends and lovers are hardly touched upon. Even his best friend and comrade in arms Collingwood is barely mentioned. The relationships that the biography does touch upon are examined under the aspect of how they enabled Nelson to develope his own set of strategies and leadership qualities. To that end the book focuses on Nelson's relationships to his immediate superiors (Hood, Jervis, Keith), especially in regards to the way he was used by them and used them in turn. Sadly, even though the book stresses the legendary good rapport Nelson had with the people serving under him, who held him in high regard, we only get a couple of anecdotes about the subject, compared to the vast analysis of his relations with his superiors.
In fact, the biography relates its anecdotes very sparingly, which makes it a rather dry read as a whole. The facts you might know from other biographies are all there, but they don't flow as lively as in, say, R.J.B. Knight's recent biography -- who took about 200 pages to narrate a chain of events that Lambert summises in 60. Again, this is justified in that in that Nelson: Britannia's God Of War had a clear focus on Nelson's development as a military commander, while Knight attempted to paint a broader picture, but readers should keep this in mind when they decide that Lambert's bio is the one Nelson biography they want.
For all its goals to find and present the true Nelson behind the myths, this book ends up excluding quite a few details by viewing the history through its own chosen lense. However, the biography is serious about dissolving some of the myths surrounding Nelson, even devoting a whole essay in the appendix to disprove the Black Legend surrounding Nelson's involvement with the Neapolitan revolution of 1799. These parts are particularly exciting as the book takes some of the same details that Knight's biography brought up, but interprets them to support a completely opposed line of argumentation. It appears, every Nelson enthusiast will continue to have to do their own bit of research in order to decide how the controversy should be regarded.
In the end, I'm of two minds about this book:
One the one hand the book achieved what it set out to do, by focusing on Nelson as a military man, and his genius, unique understanding of the demands on the sailing navies of the time. At the same time it looked critically at some of the more popular and oftentime false stories surrounding the famous admiral, all the while never understating the worship Nelson had already attracted during his lifetime. The sections on Christian imagery and associated literary tropes connected with Britain's Romantic hero are particularly worth mentioning. I also appreciated the last part of the book focusing on what Nelson and Trafalgar meant to Great Britain on a national level, and how this meaning might have been transported into the 21st century, since this is the one aspect about Nelson that tends to fascinate me the most. It appears I am very much attracted to hero cults and how they arise. Go figure.
This last part, however, got a bit muddied by the fact, that the author let his very personal feelings on the issue shine through a little bit too much.
On the other hand, and lastly, I prefer biographies that offer broader stories, more anecdotes, more direct quotes from letters. The lack of these make Nelson: Britannia's God of War something of a dry read, and since I'm reading these naval biographies as an absolute layperson, not as a scholar and most certainly not a historian, I would have appreciated a different approach, loosened up by a couple more actual stories -- fat and meat attached! -- rather than their dry bones.