My first question is, surely the whole value of music is that it offers an experience that transcends the conditions of our society, culture or sub-culture, nation, tribe - in short, our ethnos; so why would we want to break it down along those lines and create divisions where there should be none?
The answer, as the author of this book ably shows, is that that is precisely the opposite of what ethnomusicologists are about. They study the way people use and relate to music, both communally and individually, precisely in order to see why this strange thing can be found all but universally. The author recalls his early days in his discipline, when it had barely been born out of the borderlands of music and anthropology, when they were determined to get back to 'pure' folk or traditional music and strip away from it any hints of 'modernity', whether pop music or art ('classical') music, or any form of syncretism. As the years have gone on, they have come to realise that this task is not just difficult - indeed, impossible - but entirely beside the point. The picture is far richer and deeper than that. People engage with, develop, replicate and use the music they have at hand, and what they do with it is interesting, precisely because they are people, regardless of any nonsense about 'purity'.
This becomes all the more important today as we face up to issues with music in the developed world today. Music is no longer something for everyone to make and to join in with, but for a handful of exceptionally talented people to make and everyone else to listen to and applaud. (Note that this is true in the worlds both of 'art' and 'popular' music). The relative decline of organised religion in the developed world is partly responsible for this, in that people no longer sing together on a regular basis. But it seems to me that there is a slightly deeper problem. When people go to church and sing hymns, they are singing words which they basically assent to. How is it possible to make music in a world where the dissenting individual is seen as the highest good? How is it possible to sing any more in unison, let alone harmony?
Perhaps these are questions which ethnomusicology can help us to answer. This book certainly contains no Big Answers. Ethnomusicologists mostly engage in the collection of data, of which not a few are described here as examples. The discipline simply hasn't been around long enough to discover anything of any magnitude. The absence of attempts at Big Answers, I think, displays a creditable humility.
Having commended the book's subject, then, why, you might ask, the mediocre rating? Well, tragically, the author has fallen into the academic trap of using long, ugly words for short, beautiful concepts (case in point: 'ethnomusicology', though the author quite rightly notes that this is no longer the right word) for fear of being thought frivolous. I suspect that lying behind this habit there is an insecurity in his relatively young and lightly established discipline, and using scientific-sounding words can be used as a mask for that. Unfortunately, obfuscation is all too often a cover for a shortage of content.
Chapter 1: Defining ethnomusicology
Chapter 2: A bit of history
Chapter 3: Conducting research
Chapter 4: The nature of music
Chapter 5: Music as culture
Chapter 6: Individual musicians
Chapter 7: Writing music history
Chapter 8: Ethnomusicology in the modern world
Chapter 9: Ethnomusicologists at work